[Bug preprocessor/88937] valgrind error in parse_has_include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88937 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) > Patch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00222.html Thank you David for the patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/88835] overly aggressive -Werror=format-overflow for printf since r265648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > warning from the translation unit below. It doesn't seem to correspond to > the code pointed to in the discussion > (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11369#issuecomment-453044884): > the mfree() ca

[Bug fortran/66089] [7/8/9 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|mikael at gc

[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #1) > len is unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT, so bits_to_bytes_round_down does an unsigned > division... That shouldn't make a difference though, both dividend and divisor should

[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/87770] [8/9 Regression] ICE in type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:25230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87770 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 5 06:11:25 2019 New Revision: 268529 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268529&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR87770] test partial specializations for type dependence When instan

[Bug c/89201] Secret/Necessary memset() is Eliminated when Compiling at -O1/O2/O3 (Insecure Compiler Optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug objc++/56604] Missing obj-c++.srcman target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18) > For the record with darwin15 I had to add > > /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Headers/ > NSEnumerator.h > /System/Library/Fra

[Bug tree-optimization/89202] New: missing -Wnonnull-dereference or -Wuninitialized for a certain bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89202 Bug ID: 89202 Summary: missing -Wnonnull-dereference or -Wuninitialized for a certain bug Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/88993] [9 Regression] GCC 9 -Wformat-overflow=2 should reflect real libc limits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88993 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c/89201] Secret/Necessary memset() is Eliminated when Compiling at -O1/O2/O3 (Insecure Compiler Optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/88993] [9 Regression] GCC 9 -Wformat-overflow=2 should reflect real libc limits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88993 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c/89201] Secret/Necessary memset() is Eliminated when Compiling at -O1/O2/O3 (Insecure Compiler Optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89201] New: Secret/Necessary memset() is Eliminated when Compiling at -O1/O2/O3 (Insecure Compiler Optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201 Bug ID: 89201 Summary: Secret/Necessary memset() is Eliminated when Compiling at -O1/O2/O3 (Insecure Compiler Optimization) Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/88937] valgrind error in parse_has_include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88937 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Component|preprocessor|c++ Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug target/89175] gcc's conversion code from double to unsigned int handles overflows incorrectly on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89175 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See bug 27682.

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I just created PR89200, on which this meta-bug should depend, > but I don't know how to edit the "Depends on" list. You don't have to edit 'Depends on', but you have to mark the new PR (here 89200)

[Bug fortran/70752] Incorrect LEN for ALLOCATABLE CHARACTER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Any plan for back porting? If not, this PR could be closed. Related to pr89200.

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/88572] error: braces around scalar initializer - should be a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88572 --- Comment #14 from Will Wray --- I intend to submit a patch, or two patches, for these scalar braced init issues: Case 1: GCC rejects braced-init of scalars in aggregates. It should accept. Case 2: GCC accepts empty braced-init of scalars (com

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 --- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson --- gfortran 8.2.0 code gives the correct output: $gfortran corrupted-component.f90 $./a.out 12 $gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 8.2.0

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 --- Comment #3 from Damian Rouson --- I just created PR89200, on which this meta-bug should depend, but I don't know how to edit the "Depends on" list.

[Bug fortran/89200] New: Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 Bug ID: 89200 Summary: Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/88979] [C++20] P0634R3 not working for constructor parameter types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88979 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- And by the same token, I suspect this ought to work too: template struct A { A(T::type); };

[Bug c++/89187] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in initialize_argument_information, at calls.c:2023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89187 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug c++/88937] valgrind error in parse_has_include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88937 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- It's clearly wrong to access token->val.node for token->type == CPP_STRING and token->type == CPP_HEADER_NAME. It's effectively casting the length of the header name to a (cpp_hashnode *). For reference, th

[Bug fortran/66089] [7/8/9 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig --- Works for type :: t integer :: c end type t type(t), dimension(5) :: a, b type(t), dimension(:), allocatable :: c a = t(1) b = t(7) allocate(c(5), source=t(13)) c = plus(c(1), b) pr

[Bug c++/89158] [8/9 Regression] by-value capture of ICE variable isn't an lvalue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf --- The ICE in comment #0 is fixed on trunk so far. The ICE is comment #1 is occurring on a different path and is under further investigation, as well as the other wrong-code issues.

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Mon Feb 4 20:44:22 2019 New Revision: 268525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268525&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-04 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/89077

[Bug go/89199] New: libgo intermittent testcase failures on ppc64le power9 after r268458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89199 Bug ID: 89199 Summary: libgo intermittent testcase failures on ppc64le power9 after r268458 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89197] Templated Functions const auto assignment causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197 --- Comment #2 from Cameron --- Behavior is also similar on 8.1. All functions build on gcc 7.4. According to the online compilation found here: https://godbolt.org/z/MJkd-8

[Bug tree-optimization/89198] GCC generates/fails to optimize unnecessary sign extension instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89198 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization --- Comment #1 from An

[Bug rtl-optimization/89198] New: GCC generates/fails to optimize unnecessary sign extension instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89198 Bug ID: 89198 Summary: GCC generates/fails to optimize unnecessary sign extension instruction Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-opt

[Bug libstdc++/89196] clock::to_time_t(ftime) not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89196 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89197] Templated Functions const auto assignment causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197 --- Comment #1 from Cameron --- The foo_fails functions is where the error can be observed. The working functions are to show behavior with non-templated, and non-deduced types respectively.

[Bug c++/89197] New: Templated Functions const auto assignment causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197 Bug ID: 89197 Summary: Templated Functions const auto assignment causes internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89158] [8/9 Regression] by-value capture of ICE variable isn't an lvalue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug libstdc++/89196] clock::to_time_t(ftime) not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89196 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What options are you using to compile the example code?

[Bug c++/89158] [8/9 Regression] by-value capture of ICE variable isn't an lvalue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89158 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Looks like using mark_lvalue_use instead works.

[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 --- Comment #1 from Wilco --- make_extraction does: if (MEM_P (inner)) { poly_int64 offset; /* POS counts from lsb, but make OFFSET count in memory order. */ if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN) offset

[Bug c++/89196] New: clock::to_time_t(ftime)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89196 Bug ID: 89196 Summary: clock::to_time_t(ftime) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: una

[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64 Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] New: [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 Bug ID: 89195 Summary: [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug libstdc++/89194] [9 regression] build failure with libstdc++ with std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89194 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/89194] [9 regression] build failure with libstdc++ with std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89194 --- Comment #1 from Hannes Hauswedell --- Created attachment 45600 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45600&action=edit ii generated with -std=c++2a

[Bug libstdc++/89194] New: [9 regression] build failure with libstdc++ with std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89194 Bug ID: 89194 Summary: [9 regression] build failure with libstdc++ with std=c++2a Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug middle-end/87887] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:269

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87887 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/89164] can construct vector with non-copyable-but-trivially-copyable elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89164 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/87064] [9 regression] libgomp.oacc-fortran/reduction-3.f90 fails starting with r263751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064 --- Comment #29 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Feb 4 16:48:30 2019 New Revision: 268524 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268524&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-04 Bill Schmidt PR target/87064 Backport fr

[Bug target/87064] [9 regression] libgomp.oacc-fortran/reduction-3.f90 fails starting with r263751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064 --- Comment #28 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Feb 4 16:47:12 2019 New Revision: 268523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268523&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-04 Bill Schmidt PR target/87064 Backport fr

[Bug go/89193] New: "make distclean" leaves stuff in gotools/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89193 Bug ID: 89193 Summary: "make distclean" leaves stuff in gotools/ Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug fortran/89103] Allow blank format items in format strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/89100] Default widths for i, f and g format specifiers in format strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug go/89123] Too many go test failures on s390x-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89123 --- Comment #9 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- Thanks for the pointer, I implemented the functions and now the startup seems to be fully functional again. I'm still checking whether the remaining 50ish libgo test suite failures I see are due

[Bug tree-optimization/88835] overly aggressive -Werror=format-overflow for printf since r265648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Martin, please also let me know what specifically about the warning you find misleading so I can make it better.

[Bug c++/89187] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in initialize_argument_information, at calls.c:2023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89187 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|target

[Bug tree-optimization/88835] overly aggressive -Werror=format-overflow for printf since r265648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||85741 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug libstdc++/88170] [9 Regression] pretty printer FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88170 --- Comment #7 from Will Wray --- Thanks for the fix - apologies again for the break. Works for me. I'd lost the trail but see now that pp_c_flag_gnu_v3 is set in error.c calls decl_as_dwarf_string lang_decl_dwarf_name in turn called from cp

[Bug middle-end/88560] [9 Regression] armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c and related regressions after r266385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560 --- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina --- Hi Vladimir, sorry for the delay, I was away last week. The patch looks good, please go ahead and commit it. I will fix the testisms after it has been committed. Thanks, Tamar

[Bug c/88698] Relax generic vector conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88698 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/88670] [meta-bug] generic vector extension issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670 Bug 88670 depends on bug 88698, which changed state. Bug 88698 Summary: Relax generic vector conversions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88698 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/89192] -Wuninitialized doesn't warn about a vector initialization with uninitialized field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89192 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- On the other hand, it looks like an "easy" case where the front-end could notice that we are using b as an rvalue before it is initialized and warn about it without relying on the middle-end. It could fall unde

[Bug c/88698] Relax generic vector conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88698 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Monakov --- Author: amonakov Date: Mon Feb 4 15:00:41 2019 New Revision: 268522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268522&root=gcc&view=rev Log: doc: showcase a "union of vectors" pattern (PR 88698) PR

[Bug target/89190] [8/9 regression][ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88835] overly aggressive -Werror=format-overflow for printf since r265648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 45598 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45598&action=edit One another-test case I see one another test-case that comes from here: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issue

[Bug c++/89192] -Wuninitialized doesn't warn about a vector initialization with uninitialized field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89192 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Or rather it is not the destructor call but the load of 'b' from *this that is not "optimized".

[Bug ipa/87957] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in warn_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:1051 since r265519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957 --- Comment #32 from Jan Hubicka --- > I guess we might end up streaming stuff we don't need. Can't we simply > remove the assert? We do build the copy using the main variant type > so this seems to be just a consistency check. The consistency

[Bug c++/89192] -Wuninitialized doesn't warn about a vector initialization with uninitialized field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89192 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Blocks|

[Bug target/89187] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in initialize_argument_information, at calls.c:2023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89187 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.5 Summary|ICE in

[Bug target/89187] ICE in initialize_argument_information, at calls.c:2023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89187 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/89192] New: -Wuninitialized doesn't warn about a vector initialization with uninitialized field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89192 Bug ID: 89192 Summary: -Wuninitialized doesn't warn about a vector initialization with uninitialized field Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c++/89083] [9 Regression] ICE in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6172

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89083 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/89191] [9 regression] ICE in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6172

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89191 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/89191] New: [9 regression] ICE in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6172

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89191 Bug ID: 89191 Summary: [9 regression] ICE in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6172 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/89188] ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:1055

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89188 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45596 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45596&action=edit gcc9-pr89188.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c/89180] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/82501] AddressSanitizer does not handle negative offset for first global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andrey Drobyshev from comment #8) Great you've been working on that Andrey. > I recently started to work on this issue as well. I managed to put a dummy > global variable into .data, .rodata and

[Bug fortran/89185] [9 Regression] runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct gfc_ref' since r268092

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89185 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89185] [9 Regression] runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct gfc_ref' since r268092

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89185 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 4 13:28:34 2019 New Revision: 268521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268521&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Do not dereference NULL pointer in resolve_ref (PR fortran/89185). 2019-0

[Bug target/89190] [8/9 regression][ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/89188] ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:1055

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89188 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/89190] New: [8/9 regression][ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190 Bug ID: 89190 Summary: [8/9 regression][ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/88856] [8/9 Regression] gfortran producing wrong code with -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88856 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #14) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > > ... Can't what you are doing in the splitters be done in > > define_peephole2 instead? > > Not that easy unf

[Bug lto/89147] flto removes functions implemented in asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89147 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89150] [9 regression] Tree form bitmaps break GC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug lto/57703] Assembler function definition moved to a different ltrans then call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru --- Comment #11

[Bug target/88856] [8/9 Regression] gfortran producing wrong code with -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88856 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > ... Can't what you are doing in the splitters be done in > define_peephole2 instead? Not that easy unfortunately. peephole2 will run after reload. So the FP

[Bug target/89186] [9 Regression] ICE in mark_addressable at gcc/gimple-expr.c:894 since r268138

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89186 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45595 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45595&action=edit gcc9-pr89186.patch Untested fix. If we can come up with a testcase where the memcmp needs to be called on code

[Bug ipa/88985] [9 Regression] ICE in estimate_edge_devirt_benefit, at ipa-fnsummary.c:2585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88985 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/88985] [9 Regression] ICE in estimate_edge_devirt_benefit, at ipa-fnsummary.c:2585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88985 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 4 12:26:14 2019 New Revision: 268518 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268518&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Bail out when ipa_fn_summaries does not contain entry for callee (PR ipa/8

[Bug d/88958] ICE in walk_aliased_vdefs_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88958 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Author: marxin > Date: Mon Feb 4 12:19:48 2019 > New Revision: 268516 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268516&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > Bail out when ipa

[Bug fortran/88912] Fortran compiler segfaults when pre-include file is not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88912 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88912] Fortran compiler segfaults when pre-include file is not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88912 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 4 12:20:59 2019 New Revision: 268517 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268517&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Report error when -fpre-include can't be opened (PR fortran/88912). 2019-

[Bug d/88958] ICE in walk_aliased_vdefs_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88958 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 4 12:19:48 2019 New Revision: 268516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268516&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Bail out when ipa_fn_summaries does not contain entry for callee (PR ipa/8

[Bug target/89189] New: missed optimization for 16/8-bit vector shuffle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89189 Bug ID: 89189 Summary: missed optimization for 16/8-bit vector shuffle Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug target/89186] [9 Regression] ICE in mark_addressable at gcc/gimple-expr.c:894 since r268138

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89186 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think there is a bug since r236195, emit_block_comp_via_libcall expects to be called with the MEM arguments, rather than with XEXP (mem, 0) of those MEMs.

[Bug target/88850] [9 Regression] Hard register coming out of expand causing reload to fail.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88850 --- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina --- Yes, sorry for the delay. A different patch which doesn't change the costs is now validating. Will post today or tomorrow.

[Bug libstdc++/89181] Can std C++ library follow ISO spec parameter names?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89181 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- > a #define before a header, that just looks like bad coding? You do that all the time. gcc -Dn=20 ...

  1   2   >