https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63149
krux changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hoganmeier at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80586
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 27 01:36:40 2019
New Revision: 268309
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268309&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/89020
* io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
On 1/26/19 1:07 PM, anlauf at gmx dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
>
> Harald Anlauf changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88958
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
This is code that the front-end implementation accepts as valid code, but it
should be an error. Referencing f on is own does not automatically take the
address of it, e.g:
auto a = f;// f(int) is not cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89070
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89056
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Darryl Okahata from comment #6)
> I just wish the C++ standard instead just allowed an undefined value to be
> returned, instead of generating bad optimized code.
It does allow it. The behavio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88358
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Lesser ---
Almost the same fix has to apply when the declarator is unqualified: Always
treat T::something as a value, never as a type. This is not part of the allowed
contexts in P0634. I don't know which core discussi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88933
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88933
--- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Sat Jan 26 22:19:17 2019
New Revision: 268305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR ipa/88933] Careful CFG cleanup in IPA-CP function transformation
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89076
Bug ID: 89076
Summary: gcc/dwarf2out.c:23270:9: warning: duplicated ‘if’
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89042
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #13 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89042
--- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sat Jan 26 21:07:15 2019
New Revision: 268304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268304&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE when handling void initialized manifest constants.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89075
Bug ID: 89075
Summary: error: type variant has different TREE_TYPE
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
Bug ID: 89074
Summary: valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57553
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Sat Jan 26 20:45:55 2019
New Revision: 268303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-26 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/57553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69561
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #0)
> MULTILIB_EXCLUSIONS is not documented anywhere. MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS is
> documented, but not MULTILIB_EXCLUSIONS.
MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS is in fragments.texi, so I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88951
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 26 20:27:16 2019
New Revision: 268301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/88020
* io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88020
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88020
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 26 20:27:16 2019
New Revision: 268301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/88020
* io/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> It seems that the GCC policy is "s/can not/cannot/g".
Thanks Dominique, I will fix it.
BTW I set up Ubuntu 18 in Virtualbox 6 on Win 10 and it does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89073
Bug ID: 89073
Summary: x86 __attribute__ ((target("sha"))) not documented
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89072
Bug ID: 89072
Summary: -Wall -Werror should be defaults
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
It seems that the GCC policy is "s/can not/cannot/g".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 03:49:48AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> OK yes we are not doing anything with the return values of the calls to
> 'remove'.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42361
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This meta bug is for serious bugs (wrong-code, rejects-valid,
> ice-on-valid-code) which should be given a high priority.
The list has not been updated for more than nine years.
As for today I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86754
Bug 86754 depends on bug 86481, which changed state.
Bug 86481 Summary: [OOP] Memory leak with sourced allocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86481
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86481
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86754
Bug 86754 depends on bug 80477, which changed state.
Bug 80477 Summary: [OOP] Polymorphic function result generates memory leak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63689
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48655
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bardeau at iram dot fr
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343
--- Comment #21 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Before the holidays I did this patch:
===
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
index fa5f032..2ffe7d9 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56744
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
What is the policy for meta-bugs with all entries marked as resolved? Should we
keep them as NEW or could we close them as FIXED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 87969, which changed state.
Bug 87969 Summary: -fcheck does not raise signal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87969
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87969
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87154
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 87154, which changed state.
Bug 87154 Summary: Internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:12215
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87154
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uberprugelknabe at hotmail dot
co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85899
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-linux-gnu,|powerpc-*-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sat Jan 26 15:25:45 2019
New Revision: 268295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-01-26 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/8557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89054
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86151
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79134
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Since the patch has rotten for two years, it no longer applies. Without an
update submitted for review to fort...@gcc.gnu.org and gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org,
I'll close the PR as WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55980
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88821
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71906
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nikolay.piskun at roguewave
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 77865, which changed state.
Bug 77865 Summary: Regression: wrong debug information for gfortran pointers to
structures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77865
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77865
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87738
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85982
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62278
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> print '(f1.0)',100.00 ! => len=1 *: no digits
> print '(f2.0)',100.00 ! => len=0 : no digits
> print '(f3.0)',100.00 ! => len=0 : no digits
> print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78212
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 63331, which changed state.
Bug 63331 Summary: Fortran -fcompare-debug issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I will try and will let you now.
Any progress?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88960
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47030
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00038.html for comments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51790
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51578
Bug 51578 depends on bug 51788, which changed state.
Bug 51788 Summary: Unstable gfc_verify_binding_labels check for a binding label
which collides with a global entity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51788
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51788
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47149
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 34706, which changed state.
Bug 34706 Summary: FE should reuse array temporaries, reduce temporaties and
tell ME the array-size type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34706
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34706
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67420
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89067
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89069
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071
Bug ID: 89071
Summary: AVX vcvtsd2ss lets us avoid PXOR dependency breaking
for scalar float<->double
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jan 26 10:08:00 2019
New Revision: 268285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/88974
* directives.c (SEEN_EOL): Move macr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89070
Bug ID: 89070
Summary: Attribute [[nodiscard]] should be ignored in
unevaluated contexts
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
75 matches
Mail list logo
