https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
--- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Hmm, there are a few loose ends, where there is simply no decl.
For instance in this example:
/* PR c/5597 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "" } */
/* Verify that GCC forbids non-static initiali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
--- Comment #3 from Terry Guo ---
I just tried and both of failures are gone with Jakub's patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #11 from Vineet Gupta ---
Sure, but how can I ? if i click the "known to work" field it takes me to help.
The issue certainly with gcc-8-branch for ARC and presumably also with
tip/trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88510
Bug ID: 88510
Summary: GCC generates inefficient U64x2 scalar multiply for
NEON32
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87310
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49167
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Alexandre, did you just get assigned this because that's what happens with all
bugs with the "debug" component, or are you actually working on it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88509
Bug ID: 88509
Summary: Missing optimization of tls initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #7 from Nicholas Krause ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #6)
> Created attachment 45242 [details]
> Proposed Bug Fix
This is my proposed fix after tracing it and reading it carefully seems that
passing the NULL_TREE in r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> (In reply to René J.V. Bertin from comment #4)
> > Any news on this front?
>
> Last I heard from Iain he was still having to deal with water damage to his
> offi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
--- Comment #6 from Nicholas Krause ---
Created attachment 45242
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45242&action=edit
Proposed Bug Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84863
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Never use -Werror with -fsanitize=*, those really do cause new warnings
> because the code intentionally is less optimized and the runtime check
> themselves prev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88508
Bug ID: 88508
Summary: std::bad_cast in
std::basic_ostringstream.oss.fill()
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Sure this can be backported... But can you fill in known-to-{work,fail}
then please? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87759
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've started to work on it. The patch will be probably ready on Monday or
Tuesday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88507
Bug ID: 88507
Summary: utf8 not displayed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88501
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> Confirmed. "string" vs "stting" has edit distance of 1, closer than
> "stdin". I think the issue here is that it's not considering names that
> would be found via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88372
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88506
Bug ID: 88506
Summary: missing warning assigning to a pointer with
incompatible attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88478
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 23:21:10 2018
New Revision: 267160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267160&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88489
* config/i386/sse.md (UNSPEC_SFIXUPIMM): N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87992
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88478
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 23:17:03 2018
New Revision: 267159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267159&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/88478
* cselib.c (cselib_record_sets):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88505
Bug ID: 88505
Summary: missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a
declaration with incompatible attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] G++ |[7/8 Regression] G++
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88372
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88372
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Dec 14 22:45:55 2018
New Revision: 267158
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267158&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88372 - alloc_size attribute is ignored on function
p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87096
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87096
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Dec 14 22:38:08 2018
New Revision: 267157
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267157&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/87096 - Optimised snprintf is not POSIX conformant
()
{
}
void baz2(Foo f_)
{
}
void baz3()
{
Foo foo;
}
Foo g_foo;
$ g++-9.0.0 -Wall -Wextra -c 20181214-fwddecl_value.cpp
20181214-fwddecl_value.cpp:10:6: error: field ‘m_foo’ has incomplete type ‘Foo’
10 | Foo m_foo;
| ^
20181214-fwddecl_value.cpp:1:8: note: forward
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79738
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Dec 14 22:16:43 2018
New Revision: 267156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267156&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 79738 - Documentation for __attribute__((const)) slightly misleading
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 14 21:57:07 2018
New Revision: 267155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267155&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87814] undefer deferred noexcept on tsubst if request
tsubst_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88501
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: petschy at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
class Parent;
class Derived;
Derived* foo(Parent* p)
{
return static_cast(p);
}
$ g++-9.0.0 -Wall -Wextra -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88502
Bug ID: 88502
Summary: Inline built-in asinh, acosh, atanh for -ffast-math
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #9 from Vineet Gupta ---
Can this be stable backported to gcc-8-branch as well.
glibc folks use that branch for their regular smoke testing and without that
ARC tools don't even build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78986
Balakrishnan B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||balakrishnan.erode at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes, reassociation sounds like the right place to look at this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88495
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:43:02 2018
New Revision: 267152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR88495] An OpenACC async queue is always synchronized with itself
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88484
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:42:50 2018
New Revision: 267151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267151&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR88484] OpenACC wait directive without wait argument but with asyn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88407
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:42:40 2018
New Revision: 267150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR88407] [OpenACC] Correctly handle unseen async-arguments
... whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88370
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:42:08 2018
New Revision: 267147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR88370] acc_get_cuda_stream/acc_set_cuda_stream: acc_async_sync,
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Thanks for running with this Bernd. My brain was too mushy last night to get
anywhere. I agree that digest_init_r seems like the right place to try and
address this problem.
ISTM we could either add the D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 14 20:06:15 2018
New Revision: 267144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR86823] retain deferred access checks from outside firewall
We used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Obviously, in either case for -ffast-math only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82294
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 19:37:38 2018
New Revision: 267143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82294
PR c++/87436
* expr.h (categorize_cto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 19:37:38 2018
New Revision: 267143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82294
PR c++/87436
* expr.h (categorize_cto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82294
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 19:36:33 2018
New Revision: 267142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267142&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82294
PR c++/87436
* init.c (build_vec_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 14 19:36:33 2018
New Revision: 267142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267142&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82294
PR c++/87436
* init.c (build_vec_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88501
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> Note I do not think the C standard is sufficiently clear with regarding
> to restrict qualified pointers loaded from memory.
I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
--- Comment #3 from Teodor Petrov ---
@Marc Glisse: Would it be possible to give an explanation why this is not a
good idea? Link to some kind of a documentation which explains that this
behaviour is expected?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88501
Bug ID: 88501
Summary: Improve suggested alternative to be closer to typo
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The test FAILs even at -O0 when built with -mavx512vl, when built e.g. with
-mavx512{bw,dq} it works fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88487
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
OK, I see. Is there any workaround for this? I tried to assign pointer to local
variable directly and with intermediate casting via void*, but it did not help.
Casting S1* to S2* also does not work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88474
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Dec 14 17:04:48 2018
New Revision: 267137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88474
* internal-fn.def (HYPOT): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 45238
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45238&action=edit
untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
I don't think using fenv.h with -ffast-math makes much sense.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88500
Bug ID: 88500
Summary: [SH]: SETCONTEXT_CLOBBERS_TLS needs to be handled in
libgo
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #10 from Johannes Pfau ---
> I guess the proper fix to the alignment problem is using
> 'https://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html#classInstanceAlignment' (or rather
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
--- Comment #1 from Teodor Petrov ---
Here are the commands used to reproduce the bug:
$ g++ -g -fPIC -Ofast -msse4.2 -std=c++11 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
-ffast-math -fvisibility=hidden -fexceptions -Wno-c++11-extensions
gcc_division.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88499
Bug ID: 88499
Summary: Check for less than zero removed before floating point
division causes division by zero (fast-math mode)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannespfau at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88498
Bug ID: 88498
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-pr79299-1.c (internal
compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20181214 (experimental) [trunk revision 267123] (GCC)
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 gcc]$
--with-arch=native --with-cpu=native is equivalent to -march=skylake-avx512.
It used to pass before r265827.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87835
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> After r264397 "[nvptx] Remove use of CUDA unified memory in libgomp", I'm
> seeing (intermittently only, and only on some systems):
>
I see the failure reprodu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88497
Bug ID: 88497
Summary: Improve Accumulation in Auto-Vectorized Code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
unction
f2:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
xorl%eax, %eax
xorl%edx, %edx
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size f2, .-f2
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.0 20181214 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #7 from samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can confirm this test fails on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf when invoking with
"-mcpu=cortex-a5 -mfpu=vfpv3-d16-fp16", as Christophe wrote. Please see the
attached log.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88495
Bug ID: 88495
Summary: An OpenACC async queue is always synchronized with
itself
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samtebbs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88261
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> Right, but we're not supposed to ICE, even on invalid code.
Yes, ideed.
I think what would be needed is adding this C-error to the C++FE:
array-6.c: In funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88494
Bug ID: 88494
Summary: [9 Regression] polyhedron 10% mdbx runtime regression
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88483
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87370
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to trashyankes from comment #12)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11)
> > (In reply to trashyankes from comment #10)
> >
> > Which GCC are you using? GCC 8.2 generates:
>
> GCC Explorer :D
>
> g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88483
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 14 12:38:04 2018
New Revision: 267133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
x86: Don't use get_frame_size when finalizing stack frame
get_fram
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, bugzi...@poradnik-webmastera.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
>
> --- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
> In this case s->d is pointer to p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
In this case s->d is pointer to pointer to double, and both pointer levels have
restrict qualifier. I wonder if you could add some tag that s->d[n] and s->d[k]
points to separate memory areas. This tag cou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88464
--- Comment #11 from Moritz Kreutzer ---
Jakub, I can confirm it's working for masked gathers (we have a similar pattern
elsewhere in our code) with the latest trunk. Thanks for looking at the
scatters as well!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88473
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The rationale for doing it the way it currently is done:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02612.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88253
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88224
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86 |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88478
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88478
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |rtl-optimization
Version|8.0
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
