https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
Nils Gladitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 5 06:47:11 2018
New Revision: 266816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR85569] skip constexpr target_expr constructor dummy type conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86637
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
1.
% cat njcltcfr.c
void
te (void)
{
}
int
main (void)
{
return 0;
}
% gcc-9.0.0-alpha20181202 -O1 -fsave-optimization-record -ftree-slp-vectorize
--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=1024 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57659
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is -g also recommended for the other -fsanitize= options?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88363
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Interestingly, C++ definition of /integer type/ does not include enumerated
types so there the change had the opposite effect: code that was previously
accepted now gets a warning.
Ironically, Clang accepts a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88363
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Martin Seb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88363
Bug ID: 88363
Summary: [9 Regression] alloc_align attribute doesn't accept
enumerated arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88362
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88362
Bug ID: 88362
Summary: attribute aligned silently ignored on C++ references
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88355
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86637
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
I still see it all the time. I'll update a testcase here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84636
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84636
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Dec 4 23:48:45 2018
New Revision: 266807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-12-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84636
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88361
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
For reference, this is NEON code which I used on AARCH64:
[code]
void test2()
{
int n = 0;
for (; n < SIZE*SIZE-3; n += 4)
{
// Copy data
uint32x4_t v = vld1q_u32((uint32_t*)(&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88361
Bug ID: 88361
Summary: gcc does not unroll loop
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87320
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 4 23:27:39 2018
New Revision: 266805
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266805&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/87320
* gcc.dg/pr87320.c: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88317
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88358
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Nicolas Lesser from comment #0)
> It's also a regression I think in a way
Yes, this started to be accepted (for c++2a mode only) with Marek's r266710.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88317
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Dec 4 22:50:14 2018
New Revision: 266803
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-04 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/88317
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88360
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88360
Bug ID: 88360
Summary: see readme.txt for full description
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88320
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
I did a little investigation of this.
A tweaked reproducer, for both C and C++:
int test (void)
{
int vresults1 = 0;
int aresult = aresults +1;
return aresult;
}
I think that we should omit an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88359
--- Comment #5 from Geert linders ---
Workaround 2: add the following in front of the offending function:
#pragma GCC optimize("no-move-loop-invariants")
This has the advantage that it only affects the offending function and not the
rest of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88304
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #6)
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #5)
> >
> > A derived type with component initialization (like t_fileinfo) should
> > implicitly get the SAVE attribute, which ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88359
--- Comment #4 from Geert linders ---
Workaround: add compiler option '-fno-move-loop-invariants'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88304
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #5)
>
> A derived type with component initialization (like t_fileinfo) should
> implicitly get the SAVE attribute, which appears to be lost here.
> Adding it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82967
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Dec 4 21:33:08 2018
New Revision: 266798
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266798&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
spellcheck.c: add another selftest for PR c/82967
This adds another t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88359
--- Comment #3 from Geert linders ---
The same problem (with the same GCC version) has been reported in:
https://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/avr-gcc-492-crash-internal-compiler-error-pushreload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88359
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88304
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Confirmed. We do not expect
>
> CHAIN.10->gattr = {CLOBBER};
>
> I believe the FE inserts these now to better share stack slots:
Thanks for pointing to the g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88359
Geert linders changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geert.linders at hotmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88359
Bug ID: 88359
Summary: internal compiler error: in push_reload, at
reload.c:1360
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88358
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
URL|https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88188
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 4 19:41:52 2018
New Revision: 266794
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266794&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88188
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (ccr_bit): Return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88353
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88184
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88184
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Dec 4 19:28:27 2018
New Revision: 266793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88184 - ICE when treating name as template-name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88357
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86648
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88357
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #1)
>
> Related non-coarray version :
>
>
> $ cat z3.f90
> program p
>type t
>end type
>class(t) :: x
>associate (y => x)
>end associate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86637
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87980
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Is there any update on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87320
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kilian.verhetsel@uclouvain.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88358
Bug ID: 88358
Summary: variable template definition taken as function
template declaration with implicit typename
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88357
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Related non-coarray version :
$ cat z3.f90
program p
type t
end type
class(t) :: x
associate (y => x)
end associate
end
$ gfortran-9-20181202 -c z3.f90
z3.f90:4:16:
4 |class(t) ::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88357
Bug ID: 88357
Summary: ICE in parse_associate, at fortran/parse.c:4568
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83865
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
Update :
$ gfortran-9-20181202 -c z1.f90
z1.f90:3:0:
3 |allocate (z, source=[''])
|
internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1561
0xd6bd72 wide_int_to_tree_1
../../gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer :: z(1) = reshape([nint([2.0])], [1])
end
$ cat z3.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: z(2) = [1,2]
print *, any(abs(bessel_jn(z, 1.0) - bessel_jn(z, 1.0)) > epsilon(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356
Bug ID: 88356
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE with -Werror in reduce_binary_ac,
at fortran/arith.c:1318 (and others)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84007
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #2 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My comment was about -finline-*.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #10 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, I do mean -falign-functions, sorry. I both misread and mistyped -finline-
as -falign-.
I do think that when a user specifies -falign-functions=N on the command line
with any optimization option it's lik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86943
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll just include the testcase for the testsuite from the above patch:
// PR c++/86943
// { dg-do run { target c++14 } }
int c[3];
struct S
{
S () : s (1234) { c[0]++; }
S (const S &) { __builtin_abort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86943
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
pt.c calls here:
ret = (build_new_method_call
(instance, fn,
&call_args, NULL_TREE,
qualified_p ? LOOKUP_NONVIRTUAL : LOOKUP_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88341
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88355
Bug ID: 88355
Summary: [c++20] Placeholder non-type template argument type
deduction fails with custom types
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88341
--- Comment #5 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Tue Dec 4 16:26:39 2018
New Revision: 266788
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266788&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-03 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88317
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Vlad - can you look into the above? There's also lra_split_regs set
> (and maybe others) which will have similar problems. The following should
> make it e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88332
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The original machine I saw the failure on was a power8 BE machine running RHEL
7.6 but gcc110 is:
seurer@gcc1-power7:~$ lscpu
Architecture: ppc64
CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
Byt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88332
--- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried it on the BE powerpc64 machine in the gcc compiler farm,
gcc110.fsffrance.org, and the same thing happens.
seurer@gcc1-power7:~/gcc/build/gcc-test$ ~/gcc/install/gcc-test/bin/gcc -v
Using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88328
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61976
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Tue Dec 4 15:51:51 2018
New Revision: 266786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61976
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_function_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88354
Bug ID: 88354
Summary: Please warn on the use of a va_list argument in
*printf functions instead of v*printf
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88260
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
i686-elf certainly doesn't have asan support, for i?86-*-* only Linux, Darwin
and Solaris, so it is strange how have you compiled libasan at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63184
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So could we reassociate the address arithmetic in match.pd so that we fold away
the pointer computation in favor of index adjustment in the ARRAY_REF? Do we
have to worry about overflow in address reassoci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88341
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
make check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix/-std=gnu++11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88310
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88310
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Dec 4 15:31:06 2018
New Revision: 266785
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266785&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
testsuite - restore the tests for profiled + partitioned code.
2018-12-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88282
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88341
--- Comment #3 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've got a simple fix.
I can verify that it works but how do you run the testsuite for c++11?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88282
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Dec 4 15:10:46 2018
New Revision: 266784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266784&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-04 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/88282
* ir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88260
--- Comment #2 from mirhet.saracevic at gmail dot com ---
Command line:
gcc -lstdc++ -lsupc++ -lm -lc -lgcc -lasan -O0 -g -fsanitize=address main.cpp
Output when using -v:
Target: i686-elf
Configured with: ../gcc-6.3.0/configure --prefix=/opt/V6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88120
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88120
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Dec 4 14:53:57 2018
New Revision: 266783
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266783&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88120 - ICE when calling save_expr in a template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Dec 4 14:53:35 2018
New Revision: 266782
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266782&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
darwin - backport fix for DWAF5 section names.
2018-08-12 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88353
Bug ID: 88353
Summary: AVX512 instructions on macOS using Xcode Clang's
assembler needs extra flags
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88352
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297
--- Comment #7 from plouj at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: plouj
Date: Tue Dec 4 14:22:09 2018
New Revision: 266780
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266780&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/88297
* ipa-cp.c (create_specialized_node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88304
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88285
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 4 13:15:46 2018
New Revision: 266776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266776&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88285
* gcc.dg/predict-22.c: Only com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88310
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384
Jay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jay.krell at cornell dot edu
--- Comment #6 from J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88352
Bug ID: 88352
Summary: x86 mingw returning struct with just double in ST0
instead of edx:eax
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88349
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88349
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
paulhua@gcc122:~/test/debug_msa$ cat v16i8_cmpi.i
typedef signed char v16i8 __attribute__ ((vector_size(16)));
v16i8 test31_s_v16i8 (v16i8 i) {
return i < 5;
}
good asm:
test31_s_v16i8:
.frame $
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88301
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 4 11:26:14 2018
New Revision: 266773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266773&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-04 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88301
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88351
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88333
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
