https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87539
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 29 07:42:52 2018
New Revision: 266611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266611&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/87539
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr87539.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
Bug ID: 88256
Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
make_ssa_name_fn)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88258
Bug ID: 88258
Summary: [9 Regression] Infinite loop emitting diagnostics in
the C++ front-end
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257
Bug ID: 88257
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in
linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at
libcpp/line-map.c:842
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88255
Bug ID: 88255
Summary: Thumb-1: GCC too aggressive on mul->lsl/sub/add
optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85899
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-4.c does not need autopar:
% powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-9.0.0-alpha20181125 -O1 -fschedule-insns
-fsel-sched-pipelining -fsel-sched-pipelining-outer-loops
-fselective-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254
Bug ID: 88254
Summary: Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86910
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Nov 29 00:39:37 2018
New Revision: 266598
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266598&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86910 fix filesystem::create_directories
Implement the prop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87846
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Nov 29 00:39:37 2018
New Revision: 266598
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266598&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86910 fix filesystem::create_directories
Implement the prop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88096
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88253
Bug ID: 88253
Summary: Inlining of function incorrectly deletes volatile
register access when using XOR in avr-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Possibly unrelated, but PR 67795 is another example where ?: has the wrong
value category depending on where it is used (cast vs return).
>From my comment in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00234
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88065
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87297
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87297
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Nov 28 23:04:09 2018
New Revision: 266594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/88065 - ICE in -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess on an invalid strncpy
PR c/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88065
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Nov 28 23:04:09 2018
New Revision: 266594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/88065 - ICE in -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess on an invalid strncpy
PR c/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.2.0, 9.0
Summary|[8/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87816
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Nov 28 21:25:06 2018
New Revision: 266590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87531] operator= lookup in templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87846
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The implementation of create_directories worked for the Filesystem TS but I
didn't update it to cope with the different C++17 semantics for a trailing
slash. The empty filename at the end of the path confus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937
--- Comment #13 from Tomáš Trnka ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #12)
> I finally got it: the problem has been introduced in trunk by revision
> r264358 and fixed by r264725.
Good catch! (How could I have missed that?)
Backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88251
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
The warning can also be avoided by using the snprintf return value and taking
some action based on it (just returning it from a function isn't enough).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88207
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 28 20:08:03 2018
New Revision: 266582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/88207
* ir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88251
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88222
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88222
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Nov 28 20:03:06 2018
New Revision: 266581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266581&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88222 - ICE with bit-field with invalid type.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I finally got it: the problem has been introduced in trunk by revision r264358
and fixed by r264725.
On the GCC8 branch the problem has been introduced by r264404 and AFAICT the
fix has not been back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88252
Bug ID: 88252
Summary: Deduction guide assume the constructor parameter is a
forwarding reference if constructor defined outside
class
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88251
Bug ID: 88251
Summary: -Wformat-truncation=2 false alarms when compiling
gzip, Emacs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
--- Comment #8 from Thomas De Schampheleire
---
To clarify the situation with underflow / denormal exception I will debug the
issue again and inspect the corresponding registers.
I'm not familiar with 'NaNs': is it a specific value that I can s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88250
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83342
Olivier Kannengieser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||okannen at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88250
Bug ID: 88250
Summary: -flto doesn't preserve -Wa options
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88179
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Thank you for reporting this. I am working on the PR. I think the solution
will be ready on this week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88249
Bug ID: 88249
Summary: ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2853
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
For completeness, similar with outdated return labels :
$ cat z3.f90
program p
do
call sub (*98, *99)
end do
98 continue
99 continue
end
$ gfortran-9-20181125 -c z3.f90 -std=f2008
z3.f90:3:24:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
Bug ID: 88248
Summary: [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled
DO statement
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
This variant compiles and works :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
character(:), allocatable :: c
end type
type(t), allocatable :: x
x = t('abc')
associate (y => x%c(:))
print *, y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247
Bug ID: 88247
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at
fortran/trans-array.c:2068
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953
--- Comment #4 from G. Steinmetz ---
Changed in gcc-9 between 20180916 (ICE) and 20180923 (ok).
$ gfortran-9-20181125 z1.f90 -static-libgfortran
$ a.out
abc
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
We should not allow -mabi=ieeelongdouble if we do not have the full ISA 2.06
(power7) instruction set (i.e. both -mpopcntd and -mvsx should be set). It was
probably an oversight that I only checked for -m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Hmm, OTOH the C standard specifies that the store to u.b.b makes it the
> u.b the active member and it makes the old contents undefi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
As discussed, the load instructions should never raise underflow
exceptions, and having traps enabled for the nonstandard denormal operand
exception is clearly outside the scope of what cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87846
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83511
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83511
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83306
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 28 17:07:22 2018
New Revision: 266569
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266569&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix undefined references in libstdc++fs.a
The recent patch for PR 83306
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
--- Comment #6 from Thomas De Schampheleire
---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas De Schampheleire from comment #4)
> > When analyzing this problem with gdb, we looked at the floating-point status
> > register be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82918
--- Comment #4 from Antony Polukhin ---
Still rereads the value2.data[0] value in this sample:
struct array {
int data[3];
};
void foo2(array& value, const array& value2) {
value.data[1] = value2.data[0];
value.data[0] = value2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83511
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 28 16:53:35 2018
New Revision: 266568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83511 add default argument to basic_string_view::substr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
We still have:
/* When not generating debug info we can eliminate info on unused
variables. */
else if (!flag_auto_profile &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-redhat-linux
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246
Bug ID: 88246
Summary: Abort signal terminated program collect2 -
munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88152
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45114
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45114&action=edit
gcc9-pr88152.patch
Untested patch to do similar comparison transformations we do for comparisons
against INTEGE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86910
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86756
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thinking further about this, I think should always be installed,
but it should only define the portable parts.
The enumeration types, filesystem::path, filesystem::filesystem_error and
filesystem::directo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64132
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83306
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83306
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 28 15:27:11 2018
New Revision: 266565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83306 make filesystem_error no-throw copyable
The class API
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88245
Bug ID: 88245
Summary: Wrong location for "explicitly defaulted here"
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
--- Comment #4 from Thomas De Schampheleire
---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (In reply to Thomas De Schampheleire from comment #0)
> > gcc 7.3.0 optimizes below code in a way that may cause a floating-point
> > underflow (SIGFPE w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87959
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88220
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88237
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88244
Bug ID: 88244
Summary: [libbacktrace] Failure to open .gnu_debuglink is
silent
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c.jj 2018-11-27 16:40:23.821758250 +0100
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c 2018-11-28 15:15:08.254736153 +0100
@@ -15328,6 +15328,7 @@ rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin (gimple_stmt_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
#define vec_add(a,b) ((a)+(b))
IIRC that only fails for __vector bool, but I think the ppc people didn't like
this approach.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
> > __v4su
> > f (__v4su a, __v4su b, __v4su c)
> > {
> > return a > INT_MAX ? b : c;
> > }
>
> We should be folding th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
> __v4su
> f (__v4su a, __v4su b, __v4su c)
> {
> return a > INT_MAX ? b : c;
> }
We should be folding that to (__v4si) a < 0, don't we do that already? At
least
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 13:51:42 2018
New Revision: 266560
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266560&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I'm not really sure if we can optimize v<0 for floating point v even with
> -fno-signed-zeros, isn't that option about allowing to optimize away x+0.0
> and similar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is that the builtin has __vector signed int arguments:
V4SI
size
unit-size
align:128 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 87214, which changed state.
Bug 87214 Summary: [9 Regression] SPEC CPU2017, CPU2006 520/620, 403 runfails
after r263772 with march=skylake-avx512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87214
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88243
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87214
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88243
Bug ID: 88243
Summary: ice in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at
tree-vect-loop.c:4689
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 88241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88241
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
PR 54700?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> I only have:
[...]
>> as execution test failures, but I have a bunch of output pattern test
>> failures.
>
> Rainer, do you also have a slew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 13:04:27 2018
New Revision: 266557
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266557&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88217
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> The only asan execution failures I see on Solaris 11/SPARC are
[...]
> I only have:
>
> c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c
> c-c++-common/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 12:57:58 2018
New Revision: 266556
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266556&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79351
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88237
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
__extension__ can also be used for declarations and definitions that contain
extensions, but it needs to occur at the start of them. See the glibc sources
for examples.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88199
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88236
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
