[Bug c++/87571] [8/9 Regression] ICE in friend_accessible_p, accessing protected member of template friend inside template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87571 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 --- Comment #13 from Christian Hoff --- Hello Jonathan, that is great news! Thank you very much for fixing this issue, I really appreciate this. Best regards, Christian

[Bug libstdc++/88199] [7/8 Regression] memory leak on unordered container move assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88199 --- Comment #4 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Wed Nov 28 06:27:28 2018 New Revision: 266543 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266543&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-28 François Dumont PR libstdc++/88199 * in

[Bug libstdc++/88199] [7/8 Regression] memory leak on unordered container move assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88199 --- Comment #3 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Wed Nov 28 06:19:38 2018 New Revision: 266542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266542&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-28 François Dumont PR libstdc++/88199 * in

[Bug sanitizer/88234] New: UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234 Bug ID: 88234 Summary: UBsan and runtime error: signed integer overflow using unsigned vector Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/88172] attribute aligned of zero silently accepted but ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88172 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/88208] new test case c-c++-common/builtin-has-attribute-3.c in r266335 has multiple excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88208 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c++/63392] poor error recovery with missing typename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63392 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4) > I've added a fix-it hint (for gcc 9), but I'm not planning to improve the > error-recovery at this time. "at this time" meaning maybe later?

[Bug c++/77572] wrong value for extended ASCII characters in diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77572 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > I still get the same output as Martin using recent trunk, and any older > versions. Ah, I see what happens, I get the same nonsensical output as Martin when I

[Bug c++/72754] pointer to an unnamed struct with a sole flexible array member accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87742] [7/8/9 Regression] false warning: array subscript 3 is above array bounds of 'const std::type_info* const [3]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87742 --- Comment #4 from Liu Hao --- In my real-world example, 0) the enclosing function is indeterminately recursive, but there is no infinite loop, and 1) `o` has type `size_t`, which is a compile time constant because it is the index of a type in a

[Bug rtl-optimization/88233] combine fails to merge insns leaving unneeded reg copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88233 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88187] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++17: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88187 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88187] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++17: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88187 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 27 23:52:26 2018 New Revision: 266537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266537&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88187 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Don't diagnose ded

[Bug fortran/88229] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88228] ICE in check_null, at fortran/expr.c:2691

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88228 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Pri

[Bug middle-end/88175] Showing header file instead of source code line for uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88175 --- Comment #13 from Jonny Grant --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11) > (In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #8) > > Do you agree this warning output should be changed to clarify? > > Yes, there's plenty of room to improve it. >

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88227] ICE in gfc_convert_boz, at fortran/target-memory.c:788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Prior

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #53 from postmas...@conky-be.bounceio.net --- Created attachment 45108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45108&action=edit attachment-117920-1.eml

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #52 from postmas...@conky-be.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Ugh! What to do next? Well, your

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #51 from postmas...@conky-be.bounceio.net --- Your email was bounced... - ... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Oh no! What to do next? Well,

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #50 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Nov 27 23:25:56 2018 New Revision: 266533 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266533&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/67843 set shared_ptr lock policy at build-time This resolv

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Nov 27 23:25:56 2018 New Revision: 266533 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266533&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/67843 set shared_ptr lock policy at build-time This resolv

[Bug testsuite/80580] GIMPLEFE ICE on invalid code (fuzz testing)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80580 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/88231] aligned functions laid down inefficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I see that with -Os GCC already optimizes space by reducing the alignment of functions from the default 16 on i86 to 1 (in the absence of attribute aligned), so this would seem to be just a missed opportunity.

[Bug rtl-optimization/88233] New: combine fails to merge insns leaving unneeded reg copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88233 Bug ID: 88233 Summary: combine fails to merge insns leaving unneeded reg copies Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/88232] Please implement -Winfinite-recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug ipa/88231] aligned functions laid down inefficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This shouldn't be too hard to solve. Reording based on alignment should be easy to be taken into account.

[Bug c++/88232] New: Please implement -Winfinite-recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232 Bug ID: 88232 Summary: Please implement -Winfinite-recursion Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/88231] New: aligned functions laid down inefficiently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231 Bug ID: 88231 Summary: aligned functions laid down inefficiently Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug other/87695] Fehler beim Kompilieren für das Board Arduino/Genuino Mega or Mega 2560.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||al11 at lafcat dot com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > > Created attachment 45105 [details] > > > gcc9-pr86669.patch > > > > I

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > Created attachment 45105 [details] > > gcc9-pr86669.patch > > I'll bootstrap/regtest the patch on x86_64-linux and i6

[Bug libstdc++/88199] [7/8/9 Regression] memory leak on unordered container move assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88199 --- Comment #2 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Tue Nov 27 21:21:51 2018 New Revision: 266528 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266528&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-27 François Dumont PR libstdc++/88199 * in

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [8/9 Regression] gcc-8.0.1 regression: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88181] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_type failed (error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88181 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug c++/88181] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: verify_type failed (error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88181 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 27 21:04:41 2018 New Revision: 266527 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266527&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88181 * class.c (fixup_attribute_variants): Also pr

[Bug c++/88184] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++2a: unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88184 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- -fchecking=2 is the answer.

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Created attachment 45105 [details] > gcc9-pr86669.patch > > Indeed, it does. clone_body has code to unshare DECL_INITIAL, but it does > so only for FOR_EACH_LOCAL

[Bug fortran/87937] [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type" and "associate"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug d/87864] libdruntime doesn't link with /bin/ld before Solaris 11.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87864 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- >>> --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- >>> Is there another way to get a section in earlier versions of S

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 --- Comment #3 from Scott Gayou --- My last comment was a bit confusing. I can reproduce 2/3 on a standard system, and the other 1/3 requires dropping ulimit -s down a bit. (to 4096).

[Bug fortran/88190] compile_options.allow_std does not allow to distinguish between GFC_STD_GNU and GFC_STD_LEGACY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I have been giving this some thought. After reading our current documentation > for -std= why do we all of a sudden change a policy because the reporter of > 88052 does not like something? Why not ju

[Bug d/87864] libdruntime doesn't link with /bin/ld before Solaris 11.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87864 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 45106 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45106&action=edit Initial patch

[Bug target/88078] error: '__float128' was not declared in this scope on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88078 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > For GCC 8.2 using -std=c++14 instead of -std=gnu++14 will disable the > __float128 specializations, avoiding the problem of long double and > __float128 being

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 Scott Gayou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgayou at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug middle-end/87157] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails starting with r263981

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/87157] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails starting with r263981

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 27 19:23:39 2018 New Revision: 266524 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266524&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/87157 * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel

[Bug c++/88103] [7/8/9 Regression] Wrong value category when conditional expression result is used as object expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/86593] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in based_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:14272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de --- C

[Bug debug/87294] [8/9 Regression] dwarf-3 generation fails with ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87294 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/87742] [7/8/9 Regression] false warning: array subscript 3 is above array bounds of 'const std::type_info* const [3]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87742 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 --- Comment #16 from Mike Gulick --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #15) > So can this be closed as FIXED now? Yes, fixed by r266516.

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 --- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #14) > Author: dmalcolm > Date: Tue Nov 27 16:04:31 2018 > New Revision: 266520 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266520&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > PR preproce

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86669] [7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45105 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45105&action=edit gcc9-pr86669.patch Indeed, it does. clone_body has code to unshare DECL_INITIAL, but it does so only for FOR_E

[Bug target/61976] aix64: Data corruption in struct passed by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61976 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/86735] [8/9 Regression] Bad wrong-code bug with "-march=skylake-avx512 -Ofast"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86735 --- Comment #33 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #30) > I have verified that the problem goes away when using the following as > version: > GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.31.51.20181124 Same ǵoes for the 2.30 bran

[Bug fortran/88229] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- This variant compiles and works : $ cat z3.f90 program p call s contains subroutine s character(:), allocatable :: y allocate (y, source=f('abcdefff')) print *, len(y), y

[Bug fortran/88229] New: ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229 Bug ID: 88229 Summary: ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5608 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug rtl-optimization/87902] [9 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87902 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #7) > Apparently, for this specific case doing more of hard register copy > propagation is enough. I've just tried running pass_cprop_hardreg > before pass_thr

[Bug fortran/88228] New: ICE in check_null, at fortran/expr.c:2691

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88228 Bug ID: 88228 Summary: ICE in check_null, at fortran/expr.c:2691 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/88227] New: ICE in gfc_convert_boz, at fortran/target-memory.c:788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227 Bug ID: 88227 Summary: ICE in gfc_convert_boz, at fortran/target-memory.c:788 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug fortran/80467] Function Without Arguments Fails to Generate Error When Declared Later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80467 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #8 from G.

[Bug tree-optimization/79351] [7/8/9 Regression] Invalid tree PRE optimization around compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|WAITIN

[Bug c++/86205] [9 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code: in type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:25193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86205 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug ada/88200] [9 Regression] ada bootstrap failure on alpha-linux-gnu (aised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88200 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- reproduced with r266507. The native x86_64-linux-gnu compiler is configured with --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-9 -

[Bug c++/88136] -Wdeprecated-copy is draconian and shouldn't be in -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88136 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/88211] missing warning on printf %ls and unterminated wide member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88211 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/88226] missing warning on fprintf, fputs, and puts with an unterminated array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/88211] missing warning on printf %ls and unterminated wide member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88211 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Nov 27 17:07:24 2018 New Revision: 266522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266522&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 87756 - missing unterminated argument warning using address of a consta

[Bug tree-optimization/87756] missing unterminated argument warning using address of a constant character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87756 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Nov 27 17:07:24 2018 New Revision: 266522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266522&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 87756 - missing unterminated argument warning using address of a consta

[Bug middle-end/88226] missing warning on fprintf, fputs, and puts with an unterminated array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Nov 27 17:07:24 2018 New Revision: 266522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266522&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 87756 - missing unterminated argument warning using address of a consta

[Bug middle-end/88226] missing warning on fprintf, fputs, and puts with an unterminated array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic See Also|

[Bug middle-end/88226] New: missing warning on fprintf, fputs, and puts with an unterminated array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226 Bug ID: 88226 Summary: missing warning on fprintf, fputs, and puts with an unterminated array Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86610] [8/9 Regression] non-const operator erroneously called in lambda in templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86610 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [8/9 Regression] gcc-8.0.1 regression: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug fortran/88205] ICE in gfc_wide_strncasecmp, at fortran/scanner.c:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88205 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/87937] [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type" and "associate"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > OK, sounds like it might be an unrelated issue to the one I'm seeing. The > following variant of that test crashes for me as well, even though there > aren't > any allocatable character strings in i

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 --- Comment #14 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Nov 27 16:04:31 2018 New Revision: 266520 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266520&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR preprocessor/83173: Enhance -fdump-internal-locations output gcc/C

[Bug middle-end/86827] [8/9 Regression] -Warray-bounds produces negative indicies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---

[Bug tree-optimization/79351] Invalid tree PRE optimization around compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351 --- Comment #3 from Chris Wellons --- This bug is still present in GCC 8.2.0. I just tested my example again on x86-64, i686, and ARM64.

[Bug gcov-profile/88225] Slowness in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88225 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Patch candidate: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg02203.html

[Bug fortran/87937] [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type" and "associate"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937 --- Comment #8 from Tomáš Trnka --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > Could you please kindly suggest what do I need to do to get this out of > > WAITING? ... > > AFAIK you can do it yourself. > > WAITING is not a punishme

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 --- Comment #13 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Nov 27 15:53:51 2018 New Revision: 266518 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266518&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR preprocessor/83173: New test 2018-11-27 Mike Gulick PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/87718] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-concatv2si-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87718 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88184] [9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++ code when compiled with -std=c++2a: unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88184 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- FWIW, I'm still unable to reproduce. Tried (non-)bootstrap + (non-)checking builds but I get the output in Comment 2.

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 --- Comment #12 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Nov 27 15:49:43 2018 New Revision: 266516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266516&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR preprocessor/83173: Additional check before decrementing highest_lo

[Bug target/88188] ICE in print_operand, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88188 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 27 15:40:57 2018 New Revision: 266515 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266515&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/88188 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (print_operand) :

[Bug middle-end/87157] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails starting with r263981

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ struct test { > > extern struct test s; > > -int main1 () > +__attribute__((noipa)) int main1 () > { >int i; > > We want to test the vectorizer behavior, not depend on how many ti

[Bug tree-optimization/79351] Invalid tree PRE optimization around compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351 Leonard König changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leonard.r.koenig@googlemail

[Bug gcov-profile/88225] Slowness in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88225 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/88225] New: Slowness in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88225 Bug ID: 88225 Summary: Slowness in gcov Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug middle-end/87157] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails starting with r263981

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/87937] [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type" and "associate"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|WAI

[Bug tree-optimization/87214] [9 Regression] SPEC CPU2017, CPU2006 520/620, 403 runfails after r263772 with march=skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87214 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/88122] [9 Regression] g++ ICE: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88122 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/86827] [8/9 Regression] -Warray-bounds produces negative indicies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

  1   2   >