[Bug c/86668] New: mixing ansi prototype with K&R definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86668 Bug ID: 86668 Summary: mixing ansi prototype with K&R definition Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/37200] duplicate warning message with braced initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37200 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/26613] Corner case causes garbage to be output by -aux-info switch.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26613 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7) > (In reply to Mark F. Haigh from comment #5) > > Created attachment 11005 [details] > > Fix for trunk (against 2006-03-03 CVS) > > Could you submit a newer versio

[Bug middle-end/86631] [9 Regression] missing -Walloc-size-larger-than on ILP32 hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86631 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug fortran/86666] Can no longer traverse and read process environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86532] [9 Regression] Wrong code due to a wrong strlen folding starting with r262522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86667] can no longer traverse environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86667 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 8 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/86622] [9 Regression] incorrect strlen of array of array plus variable offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86622 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Jul 25 02:11:31 2018 New Revision: 262958 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262958&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/86622 - incorrect strlen of array of array plus varia

[Bug tree-optimization/83819] [meta-bug] missing strlen optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819 Bug 83819 depends on bug 86622, which changed state. Bug 86622 Summary: [9 Regression] incorrect strlen of array of array plus variable offset https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86622 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug tree-optimization/86622] [9 Regression] incorrect strlen of array of array plus variable offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86622 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86532] [9 Regression] Wrong code due to a wrong strlen folding starting with r262522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86532 --- Comment #29 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Jul 25 02:11:31 2018 New Revision: 262958 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262958&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/86622 - incorrect strlen of array of array plus vari

[Bug middle-end/86471] GCC/libstdc++ outputs inferior code for std::fill and std::fill_n vs std::memset on c-style arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471 --- Comment #26 from Matt Bentley --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #25) > What warning? Why can't you just pass 0 to __builtin_memset? It's a null > pointer constant. I don't see any warning from clang when using -Weverything. As c

[Bug fortran/86667] can no longer traverse environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86667 --- Comment #1 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- Created attachment 44434 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44434&action=edit C code for interfacing to Fortran for printing environment table

[Bug fortran/86667] New: can no longer traverse environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86667 Bug ID: 86667 Summary: can no longer traverse environment table Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/86666] New: Can no longer traverse and read process environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Bug ID: 8 Summary: Can no longer traverse and read process environment table Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/86665] New: declaration conflicts with target of using declaration already in scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86665 Bug ID: 86665 Summary: declaration conflicts with target of using declaration already in scope Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug demangler/86664] Demangler segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86664 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kondratskiy --- Calling c++filt on the symbol (see attachment) results in a segfault. This may be a similar issue to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82890

[Bug demangler/86664] New: Demangler segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86664 Bug ID: 86664 Summary: Demangler segfaults Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler Assignee:

[Bug c++/86663] New: g++ ICE with -std=c++11

cc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.0 20180724 (experimental) [trunk revision 262942] (G

[Bug target/86662] msp430-elf segfault with -flto and -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86662 --- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Untested patch diff --git a/gcc/tree.c b/gcc/tree.c index bace9c8..54384ad 100644 --- a/gcc/tree.c +++ b/gcc/tree.c @@ -9802,8 +9802,7 @@ build_common_tree_nodes (bool signed_char) int_n_trees[i].

[Bug target/86662] New: msp430-elf segfault with -flto and -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86662 Bug ID: 86662 Summary: msp430-elf segfault with -flto and -mlarge Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug middle-end/86631] [9 Regression] missing -Walloc-size-larger-than on ILP32 hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86631 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The relevant point is after do_compile calls lang_dependent_init. Since PTRDIFF_TYPE is a string, it's a pain to do anything with it until after the front end has set up tree nodes (prefer

[Bug c++/86661] New: g++ ICE:tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in note_name_declared_in_class, at cp/class.c:8288

-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.0 20180724 (experimental) [trunk revision 262942] (GCC) $ g++-trunk abc.C abc.C:5:31: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in

[Bug fortran/86599] Problems building libgfortran from 7.2.0 on HP-UX 11.31/PA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599 --- Comment #5 from The Written Word --- (In reply to The Written Word from comment #4) > On HP-UX 11.23/PA, this isn't an issue because of the following in > fixincludes/inclhack.def: > /* > * HP-UX long_double > */ > fix = { > hackname

[Bug c++/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44431 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44431&action=edit LTO graceful abort patch With the LTO graceful abort patch, I now see this error: lto1: error: Missi

[Bug fortran/86599] Problems building libgfortran from 7.2.0 on HP-UX 11.31/PA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599 The Written Word changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.2.0 |8.1.0 --- Comment #4 from The Written

[Bug c++/86660] New: libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 Bug ID: 86660 Summary: libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/86599] Problems building libgfortran from 7.2.0 on HP-UX 11.31/PA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599 --- Comment #3 from The Written Word --- 6.4.0 and 7.3.0 exhibit the same error.

[Bug middle-end/86631] [9 Regression] missing -Walloc-size-larger-than on ILP32 hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86631 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I just happen to be looking into this. Is there a way to defer the option processing until after all this info is available? (When things like ptrdiff_type_node are already initialized, or at least when the

[Bug middle-end/86631] [9 Regression] missing -Walloc-size-larger-than on ILP32 hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86631 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Sun, 22 Jul 2018, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > In ILP32 it sets the limit for the warning to LLONG_MAX which is greater than > the value of PTRDIFF_MAX on the targer (the intended s

[Bug libstdc++/86658] [9 Regression] Debug mode: std::copy(..., std::inserter(...)) causes "Error: attempt to copy-construct an iterator from a singular iterator."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86658 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jul 24 20:49:10 2018 New Revision: 262952 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262952&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/86658 fix __niter_wrap to not copy invalid iterators An out

[Bug libstdc++/86658] [9 Regression] Debug mode: std::copy(..., std::inserter(...)) causes "Error: attempt to copy-construct an iterator from a singular iterator."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86658 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/58224] -fcheck=pointer should detect that an unallocated allocatable data-target is forbidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58224 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug libstdc++/86658] [9 Regression] Debug mode: std::copy(..., std::inserter(...)) causes "Error: attempt to copy-construct an iterator from a singular iterator."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86658 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86598] Incorrect lexing of pp-numbers in C++11 due to hexfloat extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86598 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, zhonghao at pku dot org.cn wrote: > g++ rejects the above code: You don't say what options you are using, or what compiler version; please include that in future bug r

[Bug target/86538] GCC should define a macro to specify if LSE is enabled or not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538 --- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey --- While I agree that we want users to use the __sync and atomic primitives, it still seems like it would be useful in some cases to know if the LSE operations are available and if GCC is generating code for them

[Bug ada/86659] [9 regression] gnat.dg/sso/q[23].adb FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86659 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug ada/86659] New: [9 regression] gnat.dg/sso/q[23].adb FAIL

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.* Between 20180723 (r262933) and 20180724 (r262948) a couple of gnat.dg tests started to FAIL on

[Bug target/86448] GCC 9 compiler generates slower code for spec 2006 milc on a power9 using -mcpu=power9 than using -mcpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86448 --- Comment #2 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Using the GCC8 branch, svn version id 262483 (the same version tested by Michael), I'm getting the following results: -mcpu=power8-mcpu=power9 28.57 28.7

[Bug c/86618] tree-vect-stmts.c:3340: ubsan error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86618 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Jul 24 18:08:19 2018 New Revision: 262951 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262951&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Avoid &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS for bb vectorisation (PR 86618)

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- OK, so patch at least regresses FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lambda1.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-times DW_TAG_variable[^.]*.ascii "this.0" 2 FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lambda1.C -std=gnu++14 scan-assembl

[Bug objc/85476] ASAN error in finish_class ../../gcc/objc/objc-act.c:8006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85476 chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot co

[Bug other/86656] Issues found with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656 Bug 86656 depends on bug 80798, which changed state. Bug 80798 Summary: Dynamic stack buffer (alloca) overflow in ObjC compiler. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80798 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug objc/80798] Dynamic stack buffer (alloca) overflow in ObjC compiler.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80798 chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/85610] Unable to optimize away mov followed by compare into a cmpb in case of atomic_load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85610 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/85925] [7/8/9 Regression] Mis-compilation at -02, masking with 257 goes wrong in combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Any progress with this PR?

[Bug tree-optimization/86636] [9 Regression] ICE in json::string::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86636 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86636] [9 Regression] ICE in json::string::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86636 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Jul 24 16:06:58 2018 New Revision: 262950 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262950&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix segfault in -fsave-optimization-record (PR tree-optimization/86636)

[Bug c++/86646] Special member function 'cannot be defaulted' if type alias is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86646 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 > > --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug libstdc++/86658] New: Debug mode: std::copy(..., std::inserter(...)) causes "Error: attempt to copy-construct an iterator from a singular iterator."

t; $ gcc/inst/bin/g++ --version > g++ (GCC) 9.0.0 20180724 (experimental) > Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > >

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8) > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 > > > > --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug middle-end/86627] [6/7/8/9 Regression] Signed 128-bit division by 2 no longer expanded to RTL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86627 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 24 14:23:18 2018 New Revision: 262948 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262948&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/86627 * expmed.c (expand_divmod): Punt if d

[Bug target/82005] Early lto debug not implemented on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #42 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #40) > Created attachment 44417 [details] > Patch series to enable copying of early debug data. > First thanks for continuing to look into this (and sorry for the lat

[Bug bootstrap/68663] Build failure on AIX 7.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663 The Written Word changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.2 Summary|lto-wrapper.exe:

[Bug target/86651] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/85333] [GCOV] Builtin function is wrongly marked as "-" in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85333 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85202] [GCOV] A continue statement in the body of the if(0) statement by following a if(1) statement will lead to incorrect code coverage in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85202 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85218] [GCOV] A return statement in the if(0) block is wrongly marked as executed when there is an array index and an {array declare statement} around it in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85218 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85245] [GCOV] A return statement in the if(0) block is wrongly marked as executed when they are nested in the true block of if (cond-expression) statement in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85245 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/86649] [9 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19476-1.C fails starting with r262928

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86649 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86648] [9 Regression] ICE on class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86648 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug gcov-profile/85272] [GCOV] return statement in the else block of if(1) statement nested in a for(;;) statement is wrongly marked as executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85272 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85273] [GCOV] return statement in else block of if(1) statement when there is an array declaration statement and a goto statement in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85273 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85219] [GCOV] A "if(1) continue;" statement in a the else block of "if(1)" statement is wrongly marked as executed when surrounded by array delaration statement and break/continue st

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85219 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85243] [GCOV] A return statement in the if(0) block is wrongly marked as executed when prefixed with an array declaration statement and followed by a "for(;cond-expression;) return;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85243 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85225] [GCOV] An array reference in the for(;;) loop will lead the loop has incorrect execution times in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85225 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 > > --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- > With the dwarf2out.c file patches, now the l

[Bug gcov-profile/85274] [GCOV] A return statement in if(0) block is wrongly marked as executed when they are nested in for(;1;) statement and prefixed with an struct declaration and followed by a ass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85274 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85294] [GCOV] A "if(0) break;" statement is wrongly marked as executed when they are nested in for(;;) statement and prefixed with an struct declaration and followed by "if(1) break

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85294 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85297] [GCOV] "if(0) return;" is wrongly marked as executed when it is prefixed with a address operator "int c=0; &c;" and followed by "if(1) return;" in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85297 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85299] [GCOV] In for(;;), a "if(0) break;" statement is wrongly marked as executed when it is prefixed with an array declaration "int a[1];" and followed by "if(0) continue; break;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85299 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85199] [GCOV] A cond-expr with a iterative variable in a for loop is marked as "-" in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85199 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/83434] [GCOV] A label after a non-executed if statement is wrongly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83434 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Assignee|marxin at gcc dot g

[Bug gcov-profile/83616] [GCOV] The goto statement in nested for loop leads the label is wrongly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83616 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug gcov-profile/83616] [GCOV] The goto statement in nested for loop leads the label is wrongly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83616 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug c++/86648] [9 Regression] ICE on class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86648 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Locally, with the latest trunk. Could've been fixed already.

[Bug libstdc++/70966] new_delete_resource() has deinit lifetime issues.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70966 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jul 24 13:03:11 2018 New Revision: 262943 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262943&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/70966 fix lifetime bug for default resource PR libs

[Bug gcov-profile/85179] [GCOV] A label followed with a blank statement is wrongly marked as not executed in Gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85179 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug objc/80798] Dynamic stack buffer (alloca) overflow in ObjC compiler.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80798 chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug debug/68836] GCC can't properly emit debug info for function arguments in a back-trace when using -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68836 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug gcov-profile/85377] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with label and if(cond) break in while(1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85377 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- With the dwarf2out.c file patches, now the library builds. But it took my ~30 minutes of linking, seeing perf top: 36.96% lto1 [.] lookup_external_ref 18.60% lto1 [.] hash_table:

[Bug target/86547] s390x: Maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30) when compiling a small inline assembler snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86547 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Created attachment 44430 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44430&action=edit patch v1

[Bug target/86547] s390x: Maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30) when compiling a small inline assembler snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86547 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- I think I found an issue in spill_hard_reg_in_range(). The idea behind the rclass loop in spill_hard_reg_in_range() seems to be: find a hard_regno, which in general conflicts with reload regno, but does n

[Bug c++/86648] [9 Regression] ICE on class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86648 --- Comment #2 from Boris --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > I don't see any ICE with -std=c++17. Did you try it on godbolt, or locally(maybe you have newer version than godbolt) ?

[Bug fortran/86657] ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/symbol.c:1762 in gfc_add_flavor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86657 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/86651] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 --- Comment #2 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- (In reply to U.Mutlu from comment #1) > Do you get the same error if you leave out the --disable-plugin ? Yes, same error.

[Bug sanitizer/79635] Explain to translators what "asan" means

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79635 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/59962] --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59962 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/86657] New: ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/symbol.c:1762 in gfc_add_flavor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86657 Bug ID: 86657 Summary: ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/symbol.c:1762 in gfc_add_flavor Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug objc/80798] Dynamic stack buffer (alloca) overflow in ObjC compiler.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80798 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Blo

[Bug other/86656] New: Issues found with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656 Bug ID: 86656 Summary: Issues found with -fsanitize=address Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/86545] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in transfer_expr on invalid WRITE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86545 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > gfortran 4.8 rejects it without ICE: > > character(len=:), allocatable :: cs > 1 > Error: Deferred-length character component 'cs' at (1) is not yet supp

[Bug fortran/86545] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in transfer_expr on invalid WRITE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86545 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/86470] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/86527] gfortran console I/O not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86527 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-07/msg00086.html Don't abuse any optimization option.

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-07/msg00086.html

  1   2   >