https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 86103 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86103
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86104
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well DI is an invalid mode for mem address. I don't know if __RTL support
should be considered a valid input at all or even consider all invalid input as
not iceing a valid bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86104
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37210
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43432
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61579
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> Confirmed. I might possibly get to this.
For gcc 9 maybe?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86105
Bug ID: 86105
Summary: Conversion to ambiguous/inaccessible rvalue base is
valid in unevaluated context
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
TO_WRAPPER=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20180610 (ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86103
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #2)
> Another group of examples.
> First case is working in a sufficient manner.
> Concatenating two empty hulls (zero len and size, respectivly)
> gives
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86083
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Ah I see, so when Martin Liska removed the MPX-support in r261304 you removed
too much from the tree-ssa-strlen.c file? Then a rather fast fix is hopefully
possible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter ---
And this is the assembler code when executing -S -O1 (cf. below), while for the
-O2
version the compilation leads to an assembler file showing only the .text line:
.text
.globl _hoo
_hoo:
LFB1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
This is the dump-tree-original file, which is produced despite of the ICE, and
which is identical for -O1 and -O2:
;; Function __sputc (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original
{
if ( --_p->_w >= 0 || _p->_w >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I can definitely confirm this problem. Works with -O0 and -O1. Fails with -O2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86102
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant ---
My bad apologies, I pasted the wrong compiler output from older gcc
If I fix that const error in my sample, I get same output as you, with correct
carat.
Could I check - do you mean callnig a function like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86103
Bug ID: 86103
Summary: [9.0 Regression] ICE in in get_string_length, at
tree-ssa-strlen.c:653
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86102
Bug ID: 86102
Summary: Include argument name in warning
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 86101, which changed state.
Bug 86101 Summary: [8/9 Regression] IEEE_UNDERFLOW_FLAG in 416.gamess with
-Ofast -march=native on bdver4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86101
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86101
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68544
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from Dom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86101
Bug ID: 86101
Summary: [8/9 Regression] IEEE_UNDERFLOW_FLAG in 416.gamess
with -Ofast -march=native on bdver4
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
7;b=a' assignment statement:
type any_matrix
class(*), allocatable :: m(:,:)
end type
type(any_matrix) :: a, b
allocate(a%m, source=reshape([3,5],shape=[1,2]))
b = a ! SPURIOUS RUNTIME ERROR with -fcheck=bounds
end
At line 6 of file gfortran-20180610.f90
Fortran runtime error: Array bound mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Jun 10 12:50:03 2018
New Revision: 261387
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261387&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-10 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/79854
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85088
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85088
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Jun 10 08:20:50 2018
New Revision: 261386
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261386&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-10 Janus Weil
PR fortran/85088
* dec
39 matches
Mail list logo
