https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85934
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85945
Bug ID: 85945
Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in resolve_subreg_use, at
lower-subreg.c:751
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85943
allan.chandler at dti dot com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||allan.chandler at dti d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939
--- Comment #7 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> I believe __m64 is 4-byte aligned.
https://github.com/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/blob/801352a1470ae8542a3a1f83fb2abda35feab075/low-level-sys-info.tex#L108
says alignment is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85943
Anthony Chuah changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Template function permits |Template function permits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85944
Bug ID: 85944
Summary: Address of member variable of temporary not considered
constexpr at global scope
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85943
--- Comment #1 from Anthony Chuah ---
Clarifications:
This bug applies to static variables, not non-static ones.
Please use this example instead: https://godbolt.org/g/LzrzDj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ABI incompatibility |ABI incompatibility
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85943
Bug ID: 85943
Summary: Template function permits outside access to private
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85942
Bug ID: 85942
Summary: ICE with PDTs
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #10)
> Created attachment 44180 [details]
> patch to mmix.c
>
> Builds libgcc. More late this weekend, I hope.
I now see the assertion in assemble_integer
Hello,
Did you receive my previous email?
Pls inform.
Best regards,
T. K Acharya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> > > Please also use -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 to tell the compiler about
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69616
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izaberina at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69639
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69616
Tomasz Konojacki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at xenu dot pl
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152
Tomasz Konojacki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at xenu dot pl
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85941
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939
--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer ---
Unfortunately, -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 makes -mstackrealign useless because
now any leaf function realigns the stack.
The usual effect (no matter what the documentation says) is that -mstackrealign
pref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> Please also use -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 to tell the compiler about
> possible incoming stack (mis)alignment.
This does change the result; alignment is perform
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
FYI, -mstackrealign applies only to main ().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Please also use -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 to tell the compiler about possible
incoming stack (mis)alignment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85941
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
But this pattern:
(define_insn "zero_extendqisi2"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r")
(zero_extend:SI (subreg:HI (match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand"
"rm") 0)))]
Is saying
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Rudolf from comment #12)
> This is still an issue... 7 YEARS LEATER!?
>
> I tried to change the permission on USB.h just to get around this bug...
>
> with something like this:
> #if defined(_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85941
--- Comment #2 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 44192
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44192&action=edit
correct assembly output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85941
--- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 44191
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44191&action=edit
incorrect assembly output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85941
Bug ID: 85941
Summary: Zero extend from QI->SI lost if QI is referred to via
subreg:HI
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
29 matches
Mail list logo
