https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85763
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85764
Bug ID: 85764
Summary: bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function
error
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85763
Bug ID: 85763
Summary: Feature request: Add a suggestion when compilation
fails dues to ambiguous templated friend function
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85762
Bug ID: 85762
Summary: [8/9 Regression] range-v3 abstraction overhead not
optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61257
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, patch
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85761
Bug ID: 85761
Summary: ICE on invalid in rtl with uncaptured constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat May 12 17:17:19 2018
New Revision: 260198
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260198&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85542
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat May 12 16:57:28 2018
New Revision: 260197
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260197&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85542
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat May 12 16:39:57 2018
New Revision: 260196
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260196&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/85542
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760
--- Comment #2 from Jere ---
I was unable to attach main.s, which was generated using -v and -save-temps
The attachment submitter said it could not attach it because it was empty.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760
--- Comment #1 from Jere ---
Created attachment 44123
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44123&action=edit
Test Case 1
This is a test case used to reproduce the crash. Crashes in 7.2, 7.3, and GPL
2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760
Bug ID: 85760
Summary: Using generic function to initialize a type created by
a generic package crashes GNAT
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 12 15:33:24 2018
New Revision: 260195
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260195&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68846
PR fortran/7086
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70864
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 12 15:33:24 2018
New Revision: 260195
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260195&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68846
PR fortran/70864
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61257
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #2)
> Having explicit flags like --enable-systemtap / --disable-systemtap (glibc
> has those) would fix the issue.
Proposed upstream as: https://gcc.gnu.org/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85759
Bug ID: 85759
Summary: ICE output_profile_summary, at lto-cgraph.c:706 using
-profile-use
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85573
Sylvain Bertrand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85750
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85758
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Direct translation would be (from clang):
andl%ecx, %edx
addl%edx, %edi
xorl%ecx, %edx
addl%edx, %esi
With -mbmi, I get
andn%ecx, %edx, %eax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899
--- Comment #20 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 44122
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44122&action=edit
untested middle-end patch
This works on the testcase, I need to add a comment and run it through the
testsuite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899
--- Comment #19 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
> I suppose this changes debug information?
Yes. Probably not so bad, but indeed better if we can avoid it.
> I think adjusting the only user in tree-ssa-stru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85757
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 44121
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44121&action=edit
Test case for vectorizing, inc. assembly
This test case, written by Nicolas König, shows a proof of concept fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On May 11, 2018 11:20:41 PM GMT+02:00, "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899
>
>Marc Glisse changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> > Confirmed with a Haswell CPU as well. Without the __builtin_expect we
> > rightfully predict the branch to be 50%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61257
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85758
Bug ID: 85758
Summary: questionable bitwise folding (missing single use
check?)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85756
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85757
Bug ID: 85757
Summary: tree optimizers fail to fully clean up fixed-size
memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format.
If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails.
You can read the original version online:
https://ymlpsend3.com/z5Pw7t
--
32 matches
Mail list logo