https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #0)
> > gcc-7.3.0 worked. gcc-8.0.1 fails as:
>
> Don't you mean "9.0.1" which is what gcc outputs for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85704
--- Comment #3 from Haruue Icymoon ---
* More Information
Tested the gcc that build with following commands can reproduce this problem.
wget https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-8.1.0/gcc-8.1.0.tar.xz
tar -Jxf gcc-8.1.0.tar.xz
./configure --enable-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83140
--- Comment #2 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The fact that Boost followed us into this makes the situation interesting. We
are the only two impls that I know of. I like the std convention slightly
better but maybe we should ask for a lib change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81478
Ben Woodard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||woodard at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85707
--- Comment #2 from Mathias Stearn ---
Here is a boiled down example of some of our code that trips this warning:
https://godbolt.org/g/ChLrch. It also shows why we do this, since the codegen
is *substantially* better for init_table_memset than i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85708
--- Comment #1 from violetcrestfall at hotmail dot com ---
Sorry for typo: GCC 8.0.1 (r259590).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85707
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85708
Bug ID: 85708
Summary: A corrupt fold expression passed compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85646
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85646
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 9 02:34:03 2018
New Revision: 260069
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260069&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85646 - lambda visibility.
* decl2.c (determine_vi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85706
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85706
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 9 02:08:59 2018
New Revision: 260067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85706 - class deduction under decltype
* pt.c (for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85706
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 9 02:08:52 2018
New Revision: 260066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85706 - class deduction under decltype
* pt.c (for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85698
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.2
Summary|CPU2017 525.x264_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
Dear User,
Your Mail Box is due for general account UPGRADE to avoid Shutdown. You have
less than 48hrs. Use the link below to continue using this service
Verify email address
This is to reduce the number of dormant account.
Best Regards
Mail Service.
�2018 Mail Service. All Rights
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at lekensteyn dot nl
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85707
Bug ID: 85707
Summary: -Wclass-memaccess should excempt safe usage inside of
a class and its friends
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85665
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sun, 6 May 2018, roland.illig at gmx dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85665
>
> --- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85702
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85701
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84797
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84797
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
*** Bug 85142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85705
--- Comment #5 from gcc at foxcub dot org ---
Is there a way to make the constructors happen? For example, adding
std::ios_base::Init initalizer;
at the beginning of main() in puppet.cpp doesn't fix the problem.
How can I get the constructors t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85705
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I doubt this is supported. The main reason is constructors is not happening
the way you think they should be happening. That is the constructor needed for
cout is not happening.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85704
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85706
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
--- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz ---
Similar for openmp, e.g.
$ cat za.f90
character function f()
!$omp single
!$omp end single
f = 'a'
end
$ cat zb.f90
function f() result(z)
character :: z
!$omp single
!$omp end single
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85619
--- Comment #3 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Many thanks, Martin, for willing to take care of it. (I've also seen your
message in bug 71283.)
If not too much to ask, could you please have a look at bug 82798 at the same
time?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85706
Bug ID: 85706
Summary: [8 regression][concepts] Bogus "deduced class type in
function return type"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85655
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue May 8 19:38:51 2018
New Revision: 260051
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260051&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85695
* semantics.c (finish_if_stmt_cond): See t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84588
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] internal |[8 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84588
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue May 8 19:35:10 2018
New Revision: 260050
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260050&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-05-08 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84588
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] if |[8 Regression] if constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue May 8 19:30:57 2018
New Revision: 260049
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260049&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85695
* semantics.c (finish_if_stmt_cond): See t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85705
--- Comment #3 from gcc at foxcub dot org ---
Created attachment 44094
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44094&action=edit
Makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85705
--- Comment #2 from gcc at foxcub dot org ---
Created attachment 44093
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44093&action=edit
puppet-lib.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85705
--- Comment #1 from gcc at foxcub dot org ---
Created attachment 44092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44092&action=edit
puppet.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85705
Bug ID: 85705
Summary: Initializing cout in a dynamically loaded
position-independent executable
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85704
Haruue Icymoon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haruue at caoyue dot com.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85704
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85704
Bug ID: 85704
Summary: cc1 run out of memory memory when it compile
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Dávid Bolvanský
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Code example:
> #include
>
> char * a(int e) {
> char * s;
> switch (e) {
> case 0:
> s = "0";
> break;
> case 1:
> s = "1";
> break;
> case 2:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
Bug ID: 85703
Summary: ICE in resolve_fntype, at fortran/resolve.c:16313
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Compiles with result type changed to real or integer, etc.
$ cat z2.f90
real function f()
!$acc parallel loop reduction(+:a)
do i = 1, 4
end do
!$acc end parallel loop
end
Compiles with explici
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85702
Bug ID: 85702
Summary: ICE in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:943
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85701
Bug ID: 85701
Summary: ICE in mark_scope_block_unused, at tree-ssa-live.c:364
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
Hello,
Code example:
#include
char * a(int e) {
char * s;
switch (e) {
case 0:
s = "0";
break;
case 1:
s = "1";
break;
case 2:
s = "2";
break;
default:
s = "def";
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85698
--- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen ---
Looks like benchmark fails when x264_src/common/dct.c is compiled with r257581.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
I'm afraid the pragma problem is an independent bug that affects many/most
middle-end warnings (see, for example, the test case below). It will require a
different and likely more involved change.
$ cat u.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85363
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
In C++11, .eh optimizes out the catch, so the exception is never caught. That
is because lower_catch doesn't think that the region may throw
(eh_region_may_contain_throw).
After further poking it seems the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85700
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85700
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Burca ---
Does that also fix the issue with the ignored diagnostic pragmas?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85693
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85693
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue May 8 16:48:43 2018
New Revision: 260047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260047&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85693
* gcc.target/i386/pr85693.c: New t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85700
Bug ID: 85700
Summary: Spurious -Wstringop-truncation warning with strncat
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This fixes it:
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ finish_if_stmt_cond (tree cond, tree if_stmt)
&& !instantiation_dependent_expression_p (cond)
/* Wait unti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] GCC 8 |[8 Regression] GCC 8
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 8 16:17:34 2018
New Revision: 260045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85683
* config/i386/i386.md: Add peepholes for m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Hmm, but if you have 255 + 255 + 1 then you need to use pavgw at least,
> otherwise the vectorization isn't semantically equivalent? Or do the
> instructions comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 regression] |[9 regression]
|gcc.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
Bug ID: 85699
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85698
Bug ID: 85698
Summary: CPU2017 525.x264_r fails starting with r257581
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85697
Bug ID: 85697
Summary: At -Os nontrivial ctor does not use SSE to zero
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85692
--- Comment #5 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 44088
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44088&action=edit
suggested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85692
--- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
Note I already posted a patch on gcc-patches myself. It is very similar to
yours
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, but if you have 255 + 255 + 1 then you need to use pavgw at least,
otherwise the vectorization isn't semantically equivalent? Or do the
instructions compute
the intermediate results in greater precisio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at zulan dot net ---
Created attachment 44087
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44087&action=edit
minimal example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696
gcc-bugzilla at zulan dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44085|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696
Bug ID: 85696
Summary: OpenMP with variably modified and default(none) won't
compile
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85634
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85693
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85692
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85695
Bug ID: 85695
Summary: if constexpr misevaluates typedefed type value
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694
Bug ID: 85694
Summary: Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85693
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85693
Bug ID: 85693
Summary: Generation of SAD (Sum of Absolute Difference)
instruction
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85616
Denis Roux changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Denis Roux ---
O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85615
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85597
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 8 13:33:54 2018
New Revision: 260044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85615
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 8 13:33:54 2018
New Revision: 260044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85588
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 8 13:33:54 2018
New Revision: 260044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85567
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 8 13:33:54 2018
New Revision: 260044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 8 13:05:04 2018
New Revision: 260043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260043&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85672 #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128 when not supported
Rest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #29 from Peter Sewell ---
On 8 May 2018 at 08:22, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
>
> --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #22)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85572
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
