https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85242
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85078
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85245
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
(In reply to Yibiao Yang from comment #0)
> $ gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper
> OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
> OFFLOAD_TARGE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85245
Bug ID: 85245
Summary: [GCOV] A return statement in the if(0) block is
wrongly marked as executed when they are nested in the
true block of if (cond-expression) statement in gcov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85240
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81764
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85243
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
When:
1. removing Line #3 and Line #9, i.e., the { } block
or
2. changing "for(;a<2;)" to "for(;1;)"
or
3. removing Line #4
the result are both correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85244
Bug ID: 85244
Summary: Bad optimisation with flexible array member (may be
related to -ftree-dominator-opts)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85243
Bug ID: 85243
Summary: [GCOV] A return statement in the if(0) block is
wrongly marked as executed when prefixed with an array
declaration statement and followed by a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85227
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78497
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
--- Comment #10 from Timothy Pearson ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #9)
> You mentioned you're on a POWER9 machine. It could be that you have
> firmware with Spectre mitigations applied, which will affect all indirect
> branches. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to blastrock from comment #5)
> So is this a regression since #37727 was fixed?
PR 37727 is not fixed, it's still NEW.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85196
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85196
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85209
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 5 21:30:47 2018
New Revision: 259156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259156&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85209
* pt.c (tsubst_decomp_names): Don't fail or I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85208
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85208
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 5 21:29:51 2018
New Revision: 259155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259155&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85208
* decl.c (start_decl): For DECL_DECOMPOSITION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85242
Bug ID: 85242
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85235
Matt Turner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85241
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Di Bella ---
Created attachment 43862
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43862&action=edit
static_assert equivalent (working)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85193
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85193
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Apr 5 20:32:18 2018
New Revision: 259153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85193
* config/i386/i386.md (define_attr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85241
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Di Bella ---
Created attachment 43861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43861&action=edit
Minimal reproduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211
--- Comment #5 from blastrock at free dot fr ---
I tried using their recipe to rebuild gcc. The configure line is the following:
$ /media/usb1/vitasdkbuild/build/gcc-final-prefix/src/gcc-final/configure
--build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85241
Bug ID: 85241
Summary: Requires-expressions, fold expressions, and member
function templates with dependent parameters don't
play nicely
Product: gcc
Version: unk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85195
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85090
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11)
> gcc -O2 -m27332:
"gcc -O2 -m32", the test shows dumps for 32bit x86 target.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85240
Bug ID: 85240
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with function without deduced
return type
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85090
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> I guess it depends on what exactly a normal subreg on lhs means.
> The documentation says:
> When used as an lvalue, 'subreg' is a word-based accessor.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85136
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 19:43:39 2018
New Revision: 259152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85136 - ICE with designated init in template.
* de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85239
Bug ID: 85239
Summary: Tcl error running gfortran lto testsuite under Cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238
Bug ID: 85238
Summary: lto-wrapper: fatal error:
simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented:
Invalid argument on Cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to blastrock from comment #2)
> And I was hoping for a way to disable it at runtime, recompiling
> gcc seems quite complex...
That's not possible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #18 from Ruslan Nikolaev ---
(In reply to andysem from comment #17)
> I'll clarify why I think load() should be allowed to issue writes on the
> memory. According to [atomics.types.operations]/18 in N4713,
> compare_exchange_*() is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37727
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to blastrock from comment #2)
> I think it would be nice to mention it in the documentation as it was in
> version 6. And I was hoping for a way to disable it at runtime, recompiling
> gcc seems qui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85193
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Apr 5 18:43:26 2018
New Revision: 259150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85193
* config/i386/i386.md (define_attr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85195
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 5 18:35:16 2018
New Revision: 259149
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259149&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85195
* match.pd (BIT_FIELD_REF CONSTRUCTOR@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211
--- Comment #2 from blastrock at free dot fr ---
I think it would be nice to mention it in the documentation as it was in
version 6. And I was hoping for a way to disable it at runtime, recompiling gcc
seems quite complex...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84665
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82152
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 18:27:49 2018
New Revision: 259147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82152 - ICE with class deduction and inherited ctor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85006
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 18:27:37 2018
New Revision: 259145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85006 - -fconcepts ICE with A return type
* pt.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84665
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 18:27:43 2018
New Revision: 259146
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259146&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84665 - ICE with array of empty class.
* decl2.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85090
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> I guess it depends on what exactly a normal subreg on lhs means.
> The documentation says:
> When used as an lvalue, 'subreg' is a word-based access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85236
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
This is part of SVML, not a basic intrinsic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22318
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Apr 5 17:49:39 2018
New Revision: 259140
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259140&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use dlsym to check if libdl is needed for plugin
config/plugins.m4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85237
Bug ID: 85237
Summary: missed optimisation opportunity for large/negative
shifts
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85212
--- Comment #2 from robertw89 at googlemail dot com ---
Thanks you for your explaination :) . The compiler indeed emits the expected
code wit -funroll-loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85212
robertw89 at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83808
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 17:17:11 2018
New Revision: 259138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83808 - ICE with VLA initialization.
* typeck2.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80956
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Apr 5 17:08:21 2018
New Revision: 259137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-04-05 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/80956
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80956
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85236
--- Comment #1 from bking at rtlogic dot com ---
Created attachment 43860
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43860&action=edit
*.i* file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85236
Bug ID: 85236
Summary: missing _mm256_atan2_ps
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85136
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Apr 5 17:05:03 2018
New Revision: 259136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-04-05 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84792
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31852
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, those last two commits are unrelated to this bug, the number refers to
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31852
Sorry for the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31852
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Apr 5 16:59:13 2018
New Revision: 259135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259135&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add another workaround to std::variant for Clang bug 31852
* inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85141
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81575
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85193
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Apr 5 16:50:49 2018
New Revision: 259134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85193
* config/i386/i386.md (define_attr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 69487, which changed state.
Bug 69487 Summary: Unexpected VLA initialization of char[] from ""
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69487
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83808
Bug 83808 depends on bug 69487, which changed state.
Bug 69487 Summary: Unexpected VLA initialization of char[] from ""
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69487
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69487
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82152
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 16:42:09 2018
New Revision: 259133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82152 - ICE with class deduction and inherited ctor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83860
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85235
Bug ID: 85235
Summary: [mips] Error: branch out of range
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82152
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84665
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 16:04:08 2018
New Revision: 259132
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259132&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84665 - ICE with array of empty class.
* decl2.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83808
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85228
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85203
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83402
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
Conclusion is that we still need a fix to emmintrin.h along the lines of
Steve's original two comments. Additionally, we need to fix trunk to complain
about the out of range value, rather than quietly substi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Removing these lines from runtime does not help unfortunately:
- kasan_poison_shadow(left_redzone, KASAN_ALLOCA_REDZONE_SIZE,
- KASAN_ALLOCA_LEFT);
The right redzone is also someho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67486
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> I wonder if changing type of static array full_costs from int to long would
> help solve the problem.
>
> Adding vmakarov, who seems to be the author of mos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85228
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 14:48:40 2018
New Revision: 259130
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259130&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85228 - ICE with lambda in enumerator.
* pt.c (bt_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85234
Bug ID: 85234
Summary: missed optimisation opportunity for (~x >> n) ? a : b
with n, a, b constants
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85136
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84665
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85227
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222
>
> --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85210
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85210
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed.
On gcc-7-branch, with checking enabled, this is:
test.cc:5:8: internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl, have
parm_decl in cp_finish_decomp, at cp/decl.c:7354
7454 SET_DECL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85228
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85200
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85200
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 14:20:53 2018
New Revision: 259127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259127&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85200 - ICE with constexpr if in generic lambda.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85233
Bug ID: 85233
Summary: Incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized with
-fpartial-inlining -finline-small-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85232
Bug ID: 85232
Summary: gcc fails to vectorize a nested simd function call
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222
>
> --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Seems simpler to just define:
>
> struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85228
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Hummm, perhaps gcc expects that the left ASAN redzone will be within the
128-byte ABI redzone, but this becomes false with -mno-red-zone?
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo