[Bug rtl-optimization/84682] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (process_address_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/84757] New: Useless MOVs and PUSHes to store results of MUL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84757 Bug ID: 84757 Summary: Useless MOVs and PUSHes to store results of MUL Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug tree-optimization/84740] [8 Regression] ICE in build_constructors, at tree-switch-conversion.c:965

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84740] [8 Regression] ICE in build_constructors, at tree-switch-conversion.c:965

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 8 07:29:42 2018 New Revision: 258354 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258354&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84740 * tree-switch-conversion.c (pro

[Bug target/84756] New: Multiplication done twice just to get upper and lower parts of product

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84756 Bug ID: 84756 Summary: Multiplication done twice just to get upper and lower parts of product Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/84751] ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass: store-merging or IPA pass: cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/84739] [6/7 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/84739] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 8 06:56:59 2018 New Revision: 258351 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258351&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84739 * tree-tailcall.c (find_tail_ca

[Bug c/84755] GCC 4.6.0 build error with GCC-4.8.5 in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84755 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- gcc 4.6 and 4.8 branches are old and not supported anymore. Besides, trying 4.6.0 (with unidentified patches!) instead of 4.6.N with the largest possible N is just asking for trouble (the problem may already b

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug fortran/77296] [F03] Compiler Error with allocatable string and associate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #7 from janus

[Bug driver/83206] -mfpu=auto does not work on ARM (armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83206 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Roberts --- RPI Zero still looks ok with latest snapshot. /usr/local/gcc/bin/gcc -mfpu=auto -O3 -o matrix matrix.c cc1: error: -mfloat-abi=hard: selected processor lacks an FPU /usr/local/gcc/bin/gcc -mcpu=native -m

[Bug c++/84596] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected expression '(bool)c' of kind implicit_conv_expr (cxx_eval_constant_expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84596 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P3 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/84582] [8 Regression] Rejected valid C++ code since r257961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582 Bug 84582 depends on bug 84596, which changed state. Bug 84596 Summary: [8 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected expression '(bool)c' of kind implicit_conv_expr (cxx_eval_constant_expression) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug inline-asm/84677] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84677 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug inline-asm/84679] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate_reg_if_possible, at lra-eliminations.c:1382

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84679 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/84680] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84680 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84698] ICE when using noexcept(noexcept()) declaration on global friend function of template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84698 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/84742] internal compiler error: in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:2112

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84742 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/44035] internals documentation cannot be fixed without new GFDL license grants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug driver/84749] -w does not work with option property Warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84749 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/21547] GMP/MPFR shared libraries not in LD_LIBRARY_PATH: failure to build libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21547 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug middle-end/26061] error and warning count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26061 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libgomp/35614] libgomp info documentation file is in the wrong category

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35614 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation, easyhack,

[Bug target/20802] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/builtin-apply4.c execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20802 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug target/35365] dlopen fails because of missing _Jv_RegisterClasses under HP-UX 11.11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35365 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/28508] Assembler Error: operand out of range (145 not between -128 and 127) form m32r-target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28508 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/34516] trivial sentinels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34516 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/34452] Multiply-by-constant pessimation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34452 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug c/84755] GCC 4.6.0 build error with GCC-4.8.5 in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84755 --- Comment #1 from June,Lim --- Created attachment 43591 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43591&action=edit make all-gcc log

[Bug c/84755] GCC 4.6.0 build error with GCC-4.8.5 in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84755 --- Comment #2 from June,Lim --- Created attachment 43592 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43592&action=edit GCC-4.6.0 configure log

[Bug c/84755] New: GCC 4.6.0 build error with GCC-4.8.5 in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84755 Bug ID: 84755 Summary: GCC 4.6.0 build error with GCC-4.8.5 in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/49278] ICE (segfault) when combining DATA with default initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 --- Comment #16 from Jürgen Reuter --- In addition to what Tobias remarked, NAG now gives a clear error message: NAG Fortran Compiler Release 6.1(Tozai) Build 6138 Error: data.f90, line 13: Object TRLKOLD of type ACTIVE is default-initialised, t

[Bug c/60256] No -Wuninitialized warning for strcpy copying to self

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60256 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/49278] ICE (segfault) when combining DATA with default initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Commen

[Bug c/60256] No -Wuninitialized warning for strcpy copying to self

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60256 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|7.0 |7.3.0, 8.0 --- Comment #10 from Martin Se

[Bug c/81269] wrong color highlighting in -Wrestrict warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81269 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83519] missing -Wrestrict on an overlapping strcpy to a non-member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83519 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Mar 8 00:56:07 2018 New Revision: 258348 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258348&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83519 - missing -Wrestrict on an overlapping strcpy t

[Bug tree-optimization/83519] missing -Wrestrict on an overlapping strcpy to a non-member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83519 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84754] New: missing -Wrestrict on a possible strcpy overlap with constant offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84754 Bug ID: 84754 Summary: missing -Wrestrict on a possible strcpy overlap with constant offset Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/70409] Silent truncation of character parameters with len=huge()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70409 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Mar 8 00:42:41 2018 New Revision: 258347 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258347&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-07 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/64124

[Bug fortran/64124] [F95] Valid constant expr rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Mar 8 00:42:41 2018 New Revision: 258347 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258347&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-07 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/64124

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- s/this loop/this function

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/83712] [6/7/8 Regression] "Unable to find a register to spill" when compiling for thumb1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov --- I've decided to fix it in RA because it could help to fix analogous bugs when existing hard reg splitting code fails. This particular bug is more complicated because it happens for non-small reg class. It

[Bug tree-optimization/83456] -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy in an inline function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #2) > (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #1) > > GCC 4.8.5 is out of service. This is fixed in all in-service versions of > > GCC (6.4 and later). > > Interesti

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #1) > GCC 4.8.5 is out of service. This is fixed in all in-service versions of > GCC (6.4 and later). Interesting. I'm seeing it in GCC 7.2.0. Are you certain of this

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] New: GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 Bug ID: 84753 Summary: GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-o

[Bug target/82411] const is not always read-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Segher Boes

[Bug target/82411] const is not always read-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Mar 7 20:27:11 2018 New Revision: 258340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258340&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: -mreadonly-in-sdata (PR82411) This adds a new option -mread

[Bug c++/84744] cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/84737] [8 Regression] 20% degradation in CPU2000 172.mgrid starting with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737 --- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Isn't that dup of 84149? Can you please tweak --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold > to value to 200, 300, 400? Can you please attach -fdump-ipa-cp-details file? I tried th

[Bug tree-optimization/84737] [8 Regression] 20% degradation in CPU2000 172.mgrid starting with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737 --- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen --- Created attachment 43589 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43589&action=edit ipa-cp dump

[Bug c++/59704] Wrong overload chosen, compiler errornously thinks non-constant zero expression is implicitly castable to null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59704 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Mar 7 19:30:31 2018 New Revision: 258339 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258339&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84468 - bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignme

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 43588 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43588&action=edit Prototype patch I have to leave the office now but this is the (only very very lightly tested) prototype patch

[Bug c++/84752] [8 Regression] ICE with constexpr array referenced in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84752 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/84733] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/84752] New: [8 Regression] ICE with constexpr array referenced in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84752 Bug ID: 84752 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with constexpr array referenced in lambda Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/66128] ICE for some intrinsics with zero sized array parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig --- Here's a problem with maxval: $ cat maxval_parameter_2.f90 ! { dg-do run } program main integer, dimension(0,3), parameter :: i = 0 integer, dimension(0,3) :: j = 0 print *,maxval(i,dim=1) print *,m

[Bug target/84521] [8 Regression] aarch64: Frame-pointer corruption with __builtin_setjmp/__builtin_longjmp and -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521 --- Comment #17 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I looked up what other targets were doing and one thing found to be interesting was that a lot of them are defining the target hook TARGET_BUILTIN_SETJMP_FRAME_VALUE. In AArch64 case I am suggesting

[Bug fortran/66128] ICE for some intrinsics with zero sized array parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/84209] [avr] Don't split SP in split2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84209 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84733] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84745] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (main_block_label())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84745 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/84747] alias analysis reports may-conflict for references to disjoint address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84747 --- Comment #3 from Stefan M Freudenberger --- In this case I would have expected that TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_SUBSET_P will return TRUE, as appropriate. Granted, it would render my example invalid for x86.

[Bug middle-end/84747] alias analysis reports may-conflict for references to disjoint address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84747 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/84751] New: ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass: store-merging or IPA pass: cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751 Bug ID: 84751 Summary: ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass: store-merging or IPA pass: cp Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/80598] [7/8 regression] -Wunused triggers for functions used in uninstantiated templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80598 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/80452] [DR 1579] incorrect value category deduced for return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > As the code snippet is also rejected in GCC 7, do you plan to backport that? I wasn't planning to, since it isn't a regression, but I could be convinced.

[Bug target/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Mar 7 15:54:59 2018 New Revision: 258338 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258338&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/84277 * except.h (output_function_exception

[Bug fortran/77296] [F03] Compiler Error with allocatable string and associate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296 --- Comment #6 from Matt Thompson --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > This has been fixed by Paul's patch, closing. > > Thanks for the bug report! Will this patch appear in GCC 8? 7.4? I only ask because I had another bug (bug 590

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 --- Comment #14 from Matt Thompson --- Query: What version of GCC will fix this? It was reported fixed last year, but GCC 7.3.0 still ICEs out.

[Bug target/84743] default widths for parallel reassociation now hurt rather than help

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743 --- Comment #3 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes I'm digging into this now and omnetpp is at the top of the list. I can see if there is a difference between cpu2006 and 2017 as well. For gcc7 I used 2006 to determine the widths.

[Bug libstdc++/78420] [6/7/8 Regression] std::less is not a total order with -O2 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/84748] [8 Regression] wrong code with u128 at aarch64 at -O and and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug c++/84699] discarded value expression of volatile class type shall materialize a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84699 Jens Maurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.maurer at gmx dot net --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/79271] Internal compiler error (ICE) in 'tsubst_copy' when combining constexpr array and higher order functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79271 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84748] [8 Regression] wrong code with u128 at aarch64 at -O and and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77869] ICE on a code piece

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77869 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/80452] [DR 1579] incorrect value category deduced for return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/70938] [5 only] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:13008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70938 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68451] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using decltype with friend inside a class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68451 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/68180] [ICE] at cp/constexpr.c:2768 in initializing __vector in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68180 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67724] internal compiler error in stl_vector.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67724 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/64751] internal compiler error: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:19486

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64751 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/61228] noexcept(expression) causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61228 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug driver/84750] New: Both the driver and cc1 warn for Target Warn option properties

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84750 Bug ID: 84750 Summary: Both the driver and cc1 warn for Target Warn option properties Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/64035] [C++11] ICE in reshape_init_r when using initializer list aggregate initialization for default function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64035 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Still ICEs: $ ./cc1plus -quiet test1.cpp test1.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: test1.cpp:18:7: internal compiler error: in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6097 func(); ^ 0x8c8d7e reshape_init_r

[Bug c++/58908] ICE in process_init_constructor_array for std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58908 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/84737] [8 Regression] 20% degradation in CPU2000 172.mgrid starting with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/83206] -mfpu=auto does not work on ARM (armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83206 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Roberts --- The RPI Zero bug was fixed, I'm retesting with the latest snapshot (8.0.1 20180304) just to be sure it is ok. There are still a number of inconsistencies and things which could be improved. On Odroid-Xu4 (

[Bug libstdc++/84738] stack-overflow in regex_match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84738 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/84732] false-positive -Wstringop-truncation warning with -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84732 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Short testcase for the latter, -O2 -Wall vs. -O2 -Wall -fsanitize=address: struct S { char p[32]; }; struct S * foo (char *q) { struct S *p = __builtin_malloc (sizeof (struct S)); __builtin_strncpy (p->p

  1   2   >