https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685
Bug ID: 84685
Summary: Designated initializers warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 53157, which changed state.
Bug 53157 Summary: within lambda, error: lvalue required as unary ‘&’ operand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53157
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53157
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56973
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 56973, which changed state.
Bug 56973 Summary: [DR 696] crash when capturing variables in nested lambdas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56973
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> Ok, so the PR is still marked as P1, so we should probably focus on it.
> If I'm reading the discussion correctly, there's no consensus about what to
> do?
Please add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch submitted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-03/msg00010.html
This fixes additional failures not included in Gerhard's
testcases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
I screwed up the logic and need to redo the patch. The basic idea is sound
though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61358
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 71564, which changed state.
Bug 71564 Summary: label inside a lambda conflicts (?) with another one outside
it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71564
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71564
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71332
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 71332, which changed state.
Bug 71332 Summary: Passing non-copyable type by reference to variadic generic
lambda after a copyable type by value results in a compile-time error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60230
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josutous at dodsi dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 69756, which changed state.
Bug 69756 Summary: Passing a multidimensional variable-length array into a
lambda (by reference) causes an error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69756
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69756
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64000
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 64000, which changed state.
Bug 64000 Summary: internal compiler error on lambda that captures
2-dimensional variable size array by reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64000
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60230
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobias.polzer+gcc at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Barring further comments, I'm going to add a testcase and close this.
(Note, current clang still accepts it)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56973
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53157
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini ---
Nathan, can we close this as fixed, then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 61135, which changed state.
Bug 61135 Summary: It seems to be not able to call virtual method of literal
object in lambda expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61135
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61135
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61135
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Mar 3 00:28:03 2018
New Revision: 258165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258165&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-02 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/61135
* g+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Mar 3 00:17:03 2018
New Revision: 258164
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258164&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84671 handle digit separators in duration literals
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660
--- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 43553
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43553&action=edit
untested patch that works on testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Mar 2 23:52:06 2018
New Revision: 258159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258159&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84671 handle digit separators in duration literals
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921
--- Comment #4 from Dave Pagan ---
Patch submitted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg01471.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
I've worked out the issues with regression in the testsuite.
(Well, I think I have.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682
--- Comment #2 from Vegard Nossum ---
I'm also seeing a different crash with this (using -O3):
int a;
void b() {
float c;
for (int d; d;)
;
a = c;
asm("" : : "pIr"(c));
}
Output:
$ xgcc -x c++ -S -Wall -fpermissive -O3 -
: In funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
Bug ID: 84684
Summary: inserting random code / flags produces wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84674
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #13 from Neil Carlson ---
And one more missed file due to a line split between the "call" and "abort".
Here's the patch:
diff --git a/overload_1.f90 b/overload_1.f90
index afd4f81..66fbea4 100644
--- a/overload_1.f90
+++ b/overload_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #12 from Neil Carlson ---
Argh... here's the *correct* patch
diff --git a/literal_character_constant_1.inc
b/literal_character_constant_1.inc
index ba24966..40375cd 100644
--- a/literal_character_constant_1.inc
+++ b/literal_characte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #11 from Neil Carlson ---
One more missed file, an include file included by
literal_character_constant_1_x.F. Here's the patch:
diff --git a/literal_character_constant_1.inc
b/literal_character_constant_1.inc
index ba24966..8beea79
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84683
Bug ID: 84683
Summary: internal compiler error: in move_for_stack_reg, at
reg-stack.c:1173
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71085
--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf ---
Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-03/msg9.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Mar 2 20:38:50 2018
New Revision: 258157
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258157&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84671 handle digit separators in duration literals
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84578
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84578
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 2 20:27:46 2018
New Revision: 258156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258156&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84578
* constexpr.c (get_array_or_vector_nelts):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682
Bug ID: 84682
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(process_address_1)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66564
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benni.buch at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84678
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84620
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Jakub, ok, I'll move the union field, but I thought it would be better to keep
it close to logically-similar entries. If the point is just to make it
parallel to the order of the enum, maybe moving the enu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84678
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84670
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84672
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
This has to be some issue with the charlen - possibly a
default integer being used in the wrong place after r256322.
I don't usually build 32-bit-capable compilers on my home system
(too slow), let's see if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84662
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] internal |[6/7 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84674
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84515
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
There are at least three sources of the recursive code:
(i) The allocate statement. This checks to see if the allocate object and its
allocatable components are allocated and deallocates them if necessary. I m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 2 18:24:40 2018
New Revision: 258152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84489 - dependent default template argument
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84646
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84681
Bug ID: 84681
Summary: tree-ter moving code too much
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84264
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
So we end up dropping into rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store from gen_movv4si via:
if (!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN
&& VECTOR_MEM_VSX_P (mode)
&& !TARGET_P9_VECTOR
&& !gpr_or_gpr_p (operands[0], operands[1])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84675
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
--- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Mar 2 18:06:44 2018
New Revision: 258150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-02 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/81812
* g+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini ---
This works in 7.3.0 too. I'm going to add the testcase and close the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84664
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84663
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84664
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 2 17:55:28 2018
New Revision: 258149
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258149&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84664
* typeck.c (cp_perform_integral_promotions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84663
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 2 17:54:23 2018
New Revision: 258148
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258148&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84663
* decl.c (cp_complete_array_type): Check e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84171
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84171
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 2 17:51:24 2018
New Revision: 258147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84171
* c-warn.c (warn_for_sign_compare): Bail o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84670
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On March 2, 2018 5:07:59 PM GMT+01:00, "romain.geissler at amadeus dot com"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84670
>
>Romain Geissler changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72752
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thanks for the new bug. Note that this bug is marked as [6 Regression] and
still open, thus isn't surprising at all that some or even all the testcases
here fail in 6, actually it's expected. If you have tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84680
Bug ID: 84680
Summary: internal compiler error: Max. number of generated
reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #28 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
> What usually makes things complicated in the end is when for an IV
> we get overlapping life-ranges for the before and after value because
> that inhibits c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Elmar Stellnberger from comment #0)
> Things work well however if I use the standard constructor instead of an
> assignment:
>
> inline xstrbuf( base_str_const s ) : base_str(
> const_cast(s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
rce if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$ g++-6 --version
g++ (GCC) 6.4.1 20180302
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84662
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 2 17:07:39 2018
New Revision: 258146
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258146&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84662
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build) : Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84679
Bug ID: 84679
Summary: internal compiler error: in
lra_eliminate_reg_if_possible, at
lra-eliminations.c:1382
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 2 16:55:49 2018
New Revision: 258144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84489 - dependent default template argument
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83555
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
t a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.1 20180302 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free soft
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84627
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #27 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yea, we went through similar issues with Alex's work recently. After that work
landed I went through all the BZs that I could find with autoinc
{pre,post}{inc,dec} that BZ could find in the hopes that his
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84677
Bug ID: 84677
Summary: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at
recog.c:2205
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 2 16:19:43 2018
New Revision: 258140
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258140&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/84628
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1) : Don't emit d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56540
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 2 16:18:06 2018
New Revision: 258139
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258139&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/56540
* config/pa/pa.h (TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56540
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 2 16:17:18 2018
New Revision: 258138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/56540
* config/ia64/ia64.h (TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84676
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r208426.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84676
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Untested fix:
--- a/gcc/cp/call.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.c
@@ -5591,6 +5591,10 @@ build_new_op_1 (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, int
flags, tree arg1,
|| error_operand_p (arg3))
return error_mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84676
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
