https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
--- Comment #4 from Neil Carlson ---
Note that if the sourced allocation in the comment 0 test case
allocate(x%v,source=['foo','bar'])
is replaced by the equivalent (I think) assignment
x%v = ['foo','bar']
Then the code produces a run tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84539
--- Comment #1 from Neil Carlson ---
And same example but using character data. This compiles but gives a segfault
when run at the assignment statement.
class(*), allocatable :: x(:)
x = ['foo','bar']
select type (x)
type is (character(*))
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84539
Bug ID: 84539
Summary: ICE and segfault with assignment to CLASS(*) array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
zac changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xaxxon at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from zac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
Neil Carlson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |8.0.1
--- Comment #26 from Neil Carlson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69563
Neil Carlson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.0 |8.0.1
--- Comment #2 from Neil Carlson -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51652
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70468
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30792
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/nfs/home/abenson/Galacticus/Tools
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180223 (experimental) (GCC)
$ gfortran bug.F90
$ a.out
FROM PROGRAM8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84537
--- Comment #1 from Volker Reichelt ---
With a slightly modified testcase (namespace std instead of N) I get
a different stack-trace:
===
namespace std
{
template struct A {};
}
std::template A<> a;
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84537
Bug ID: 84537
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in get_string, at spellcheck-tree.h
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84532
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 23 23:23:43 2018
New Revision: 257956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84532 prevent unwrapping of reference_wrapper arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68226
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84535
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68226
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf ---
The code in comment#0 compiles with current trunk. The ICE is gone.
Not sure if the code is valid, but NAG accepts it
without complaining.
Adding a line
print *, a
prints
1 2
whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84536
Bug ID: 84536
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with non-type template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.4 |6.5
--- Comment #64 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84535
Bug ID: 84535
Summary: std::thread constructor missing constraint on first
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84534
Bug ID: 84534
Summary: [8 regression] several powerpc test cases fail
starting with r257915
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84143
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Looking at the tree dump we have:
_gfortran_st_write (&dt_parm.0);
{
struct Pdtfoo_1 * D.3772;
D.3772 = &x;
_gfortran_transfer_integer_write (&dt_parm.0, &D.3772->k1, 4);
_gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523
--- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
> Doesn't crash for me, but I get a valgrind error:
Trying -fsanitize=undefined, I get:
### destruct: size(rc% spots)= 80
### destruct: allocated (vm)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84533
Bug ID: 84533
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with duplicate enum value
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:53:04 2018
New Revision: 257951
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257951&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|mipsbe |mips-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84511
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84532
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84511
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:42:43 2018
New Revision: 257950
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257950&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:41:27 2018
New Revision: 257949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84346
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84511
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:37:57 2018
New Revision: 257948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257948&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:35:51 2018
New Revision: 257946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84346
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:16:00 2018
New Revision: 257945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84019
--- Comment #8 from Allan Jensen ---
Yes, I will take a look again and produce the intermediate results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Any news about the patch testing on MIPS. It would be nice to move forward
with the PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84511
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:59:38 2018
New Revision: 257943
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257943&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:57:41 2018
New Revision: 257942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/84346
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84450
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at uplinklabs dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk.
Jakub, thanks for the report. This will be backported to 6 and 7 shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:40:14 2018
New Revision: 257941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/84506
* trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84532
Bug ID: 84532
Summary: [7/8 Regression] std::thread::__make_invoker
prematurely unwraps reference_wrappers
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 23 17:55:13 2018
New Revision: 257938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257938&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83149
* trans-types.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84422
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love ---
Moved Power 8 vec_float2, vec_signed2 and vec_unsigned2 builtin tests to new
file builtins-3-runnable-p8.c. Fixed ICE for vec_signed2 and vec_unsigned2
which were found in builtins-3-runnable.c once the vec_floa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> >
> > What is the TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) in:
> > base = get_inner_reference (expr, &bitsize, &bitpos, &var_off,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
>
> What is the TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) in:
> base = get_inner_reference (expr, &bitsize, &bitpos, &var_off,
> &mode, &sign, &reverse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
The affected bit of code assumes dstref->base is an array and doesn't check to
see if it's something else. In both of these cases it's a VAR_DECL so
TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (dstref->base)) returns null.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 23 16:22:28 2018
New Revision: 257934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83149
* trans-decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No, signed comparison is very different from unsigned comparison, and only
unsigned comparison < is usable for this. Borrow flag reflects unsigned signed
comparison result rather than signed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> ..., but that just means it is not the right code for f1 and f3.
Right, that produced code depends on the sign of the condition arguments seems
to be pretty wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84531
Bug ID: 84531
Summary: c/c++: bogus warning for functions with different
argument lengths but compatible arguments
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84412
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albandil at atlas dot cz
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84529
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84447
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My understanding is that this is because cand->fn in this case (the B ctor) is
not DECL_DELETED_FN, but strip_inheriting_ctors (cand->fn) is, we somehow
haven't tried to instantiate it (bailed early) and when
movl4(%esp), %eax
movlgs, %edx
movl%edx, (%eax)
ret $4
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size foo, .-foo
.globl gs
.data
.align 4
.type gs, @object
.size gs, 4
gs:
.value 100
.value 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk. Does this actually fail on GCC 7? The regexp there should
work AFAICS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Bah, this'll be https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02061.html . I
hadn't realised that the -fomit-frame-pointer handling was the reason it was no
longer a problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84529
Bug ID: 84529
Summary: INQUIRE fails on "recycled" internal units
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Feb 23 14:17:35 2018
New Revision: 257932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix tsan race_on_mutex.c testcase (PR80551)
The testcase did not m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #21 from Laurent GUERBY ---
I'm not familiar with mips ABIs but on gcc mips machine there's 32 bit code.
root@erpro8-fsf1:~# file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, MIPS-II version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
linked (uses sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Changing that (__)? to ((__GI_)?__)? is preapproved if it works.
Those are just glibc internal aliases which are in the symbol table too though,
so if you have full debug info for libpthread.so rather than j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is trying to match
#[01] (__)?pthread_mutex_init
but instead it gets
#1 __GI___pthread_mutex_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Isn't this dup of PR84502 and thus fixed with r257892?
Very probably, let me test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
Tiziano Müller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev-zero at gentoo dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70468
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 23 13:32:41 2018
New Revision: 257931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257931&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70468 - ICE with constructor delegation via typedef.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84019
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can you please provide the requested reproducer, even if large? Otherwise
there is nothing we can do about it and it will be closed as
RESOLVED/WORKSFORME.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84520
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 83148, which changed state.
Bug 83148 Summary: [8 regression] ICE: crash_signal from toplev.c:325
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 23 12:35:30 2018
New Revision: 257930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83148
* trans-const.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60212
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80598
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.2.1, 4.5.4, 4.7.4, 4.8.5,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84527
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Try with the unsigned arguments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534
Bug 78534 depends on bug 83344, which changed state.
Bug 83344 Summary: Use of uninitialized memory with ASSOCIATE and strings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84509
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|STOP and PAUSE statements |STOP and ERROR STOP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84519
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jb at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84526
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84528
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Laurent GUERBY from comment #18)
> Marxin, you have a cfarm account and access to gcc22 / 23 / 24 which are
> mips64 machines. If you need to change ssh keys see here:
> https://cfarm.tetaneutral
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
