https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 12 07:31:56 2018
New Revision: 257580
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257580&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Richard Biener
PR c++/84281
* constexpr.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78459
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
More likely this is an RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P insn in a delay slot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #12 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59051
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83785
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Almost certainly a problem with frame related insns in delay slots. While in
the past some ports have handled this in their define_delay descriptions. I
really wonder if it belongs in generic bits created
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84325
Bug ID: 84325
Summary: internal compiler error, in
cxx_eval_constant_expression gcc/cp/constexpr.c:4740
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59051
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83828
--- Comment #12 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Mon Feb 12 06:14:15 2018
New Revision: 257579
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257579&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix AVX-512 popcnt and bitalg tests.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83785
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So this goes latent with the branch probability updates from Jan 19. It is
independent of the CSE issue I'm looking at. It could well be related to delay
slot branching and CFIs. r256887 should reproduce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61257
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48576
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #32 from Eric Gallager -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83785
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78459
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So I've got a patch for the h8 instance of this problem. I'll have to see if I
can reproduce the various SH instances and backtest my patch against them.
The situation we were running into was generic code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84036
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 12 01:21:39 2018
New Revision: 257575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84036 - ICE with variadic capture.
Handle variadic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84266
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84266
--- Comment #10 from Steven Munroe ---
Change this to RESOLVED state now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84266
--- Comment #9 from Steven Munroe ---
Author: munroesj
Date: Sun Feb 11 21:45:39 2018
New Revision: 257571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR 84266
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83231
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223
--- Comment #5 from Roger Ferrer Ibanez ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> I have a patch. Sorry, it took so long to fix.
No worries, thanks for fixing it!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79681
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chet.simpson at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 57335, which changed state.
Bug 57335 Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at
cp/semantics.c:6977
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35299
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Feb 11 19:07:55 2018
New Revision: 257568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit ChangeLog entries forgotten in r257566.
2018-02-11 Fra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35299
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Feb 11 18:55:31 2018
New Revision: 257566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257566&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-11 Francois-Xavier Coudert
PR fortran/35299
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Feb 11 18:44:05 2018
New Revision: 257565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/54223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276
--- Comment #15 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Feb 11 18:44:05 2018
New Revision: 257565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/54223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84257
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #31 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Any progress on this?
> Or shall we just disable completely hot/cold function partitioning
> on darwin till then?
IMO it would be better to set the priority to P2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84074
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84074
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 11 18:22:24 2018
New Revision: 257564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-11 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/84074
* trans-expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84324
Bug ID: 84324
Summary: objc/execute/exceptions/matcher-1.m:27:10: warning:
return with a value, in function returning void
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155
--- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter ---
All our code is fine also with this fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84323
Bug ID: 84323
Summary: call_once uses TLS even when once_flag is set
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84322
Bug ID: 84322
Summary: -fstrong-eval-order violated on assignment with
function call
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78459
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488
sergey.ignatchenko at ithare dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergey.ignatchenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84321
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84321
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code:
*a;
b, c;
d() {
int e = 0;
if (b == 1)
return;
for (; e < (b & ~7); e += 8)
;
for (++e; e < b;)
c = a[e];
}
The problem seems to occur between revisions 257477 and 257519
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84321
Bug ID: 84321
Summary: ice in intersect_range_with_nonzero_bits, at
tree-vrp.c:213
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65825
Roger Ferrer Ibanez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
Javier Serrano Polo
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
--- Comment #15 from Javi
45 matches
Mail list logo
