[Bug target/80547] [6/7/8 Regression] nvptx back end ICE with OpenACC "reduction(OP:x)", "x = [...]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80547 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > Using this tentative patch, the ICE is fixed and the test-case executes > successfully: Well, for nvptx target. For host fallback we have: ... x: 23 FAIL: libgomp

[Bug c/83966] New: ICE in check_function_arguments at gcc/c-family/c-common.c:5617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83966 Bug ID: 83966 Summary: ICE in check_function_arguments at gcc/c-family/c-common.c:5617 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-

[Bug target/83888] [8 regression] new failures after r256639 on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83888 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/83965] New: [8 Regression] ICE in vectorize_fold_left_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6154

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965 Bug ID: 83965 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in vectorize_fold_left_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6154 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/83964] New: [8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964 Bug ID: 83964 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/83963] New: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in merge_sese, at graphite-scop-detection.c:517

: in merge_sese, at graphite-scop-detection.c:517 s5 (int is) ^~ 0x72330b merge_sese /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180121/work/gcc-8-20180121/gcc/graphite-scop-detection.c:515 0x72330b build_scop_depth /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180121/work/gcc-8-20

[Bug rtl-optimization/83962] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (too many outgoing branch edges from bb 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83962 Bug ID: 83962 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (too many outgoing branch edges from bb 8) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyw

[Bug target/81352] [nvptx] trap placement for non-returning function call in vector-single mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81352 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Tentative patch: ... diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c index 69e55da8933..66131cbae7c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c +++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c @@ -4057,7 +4057,12 @@

[Bug target/83946] [7/8 Regression] Safe Indirect Jumps broken on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Jan 22 02:46:11 2018 New Revision: 256939 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256939&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-21 Bill Schmidt PR target/83946 * gcc.target

[Bug sanitizer/83961] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83961 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton --- It looks like it was reported to the Ubuntu folks at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1709727, but I could not find a GCC report. There is also a gcc-6 patch.

[Bug sanitizer/83961] New: AddressSanitizer CHECK failed on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83961 Bug ID: 83961 Summary: AddressSanitizer CHECK failed on Aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitize

[Bug tree-optimization/83957] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_phi_arg)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83957 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/83958] ICE: Segmentation fault (in find_decomp_class_base)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83958 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ada/83892] Various ICEs and link-errors with running ACATS with -O2 -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org ---

[Bug c/83960] New: Bad assembler with debug and LTO

onv-prefix --disable-libmudflap --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libsanitizer --disable-libcc1 --disable-libcilkrts --disable-multilib --disable-nls --enable-languages=c,c++,ada --build=x86_64-apple-darwin15 Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.1 20180121 (experimental) (GCC) and failure happens on Darwin

[Bug testsuite/77734] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-1.c -fplugin=./must_tail_call_plugin.so (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77734 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin --- Commit in comment #7 fixes failure on hppa-linux. The hppa64-*-* target doesn't support sibcalls, so test failure is expected. I think test needs to be skipped like thumb1 in plugin.exp.

[Bug testsuite/77734] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-1.c -fplugin=./must_tail_call_plugin.so (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77734 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Jan 21 18:15:31 2018 New Revision: 256934 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256934&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR gcc/77734 * config/pa/pa.c (pa_function_ok_for_si

[Bug c/83959] New: Missing buffer overflow warning on printf %s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83959 Bug ID: 83959 Summary: Missing buffer overflow warning on printf %s Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug lto/83452] FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/83452] FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 --- Comment #13 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Jan 21 17:52:44 2018 New Revision: 256933 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256933&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/83452 * config/pa/stublib.c (L_gnu_lto_v1):

[Bug target/83496] MIPS BE: wrong code generates under "-Os -mbranch-cost=1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 Felix Fietkau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nbd at nbd dot name --- Comment #10 from

[Bug sanitizer/82829] libsanitizer build failure on darwin10 (Snow Leopard) due to missing getsectiondata

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82829 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/81352] [nvptx] trap placement for non-returning function call in vector-single mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81352 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Confirmed. This program (minimized from nested-function-1.f90) hangs at -O1 (with driver 384.111 on quadro m1200, for GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O[0-4]): ... program foo integer :: a(3,3), l, ll a = 0 !$acc paral

[Bug c++/83956] [8 regression] error: use of deleted function ‘{anonymous}::a::~a()’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83956 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #2) > My understanding is that this is actually CWG 1353, discussed during the > Bloomington 2011(!) meeting and still unresolved. This is item 17 in this > document

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 --- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Can this be closed. The problem is not fixed in 32-bit mode.

[Bug c++/83956] [8 regression] error: use of deleted function ‘{anonymous}::a::~a()’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83956 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug target/83946] [7/8 Regression] Safe Indirect Jumps broken on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Segher was kind enough to run AIX tests for me last night. There is still one non-blocking issue with safe-indirect-jump-8.c, which should be skipped for AIX, since it doesn't generate sibcalls to non-local f

[Bug target/83946] [7/8 Regression] Safe Indirect Jumps broken on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Sun Jan 21 13:32:58 2018 New Revision: 256932 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256932&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2018-01-21 Bill Schmidt Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/83956] [8 regression] error: use of deleted function ‘{anonymous}::a::~a()’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83956 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/83946] [7/8 Regression] Safe Indirect Jumps broken on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83946 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Sun Jan 21 13:26:07 2018 New Revision: 256931 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256931&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2018-01-21 Bill Schmidt David Edelsohn P

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81485] [SH] ICE: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485 --- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Jan 21 13:00:51 2018 New Revision: 256930 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256930&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81485 * config/sh/sh-protos.h (sh_find_set_of_re

[Bug fortran/54613] [F08] Add FINDLOC plus support MAXLOC/MINLOC with KIND=/BACK=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28211|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/80870] [7 Regression] ICE building 7.1.0 sh-elf crosscompiler on macOS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80870 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/83952] [missed optimization] difference calculation for floats vs ints in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83952 --- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Andrew, Marc: Sorry for the mess with the other bug. If only Bugzilla had an "edit comment" feature I wouldn't have opened this second one.

[Bug rtl-optimization/83952] [missed optimization] difference calculation for floats vs ints in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83952 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- *** Bug 83951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/83951] [missed optimization] difference calculation for floats vs ints in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83951 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse

[Bug rtl-optimization/83952] [missed optimization] difference calculation for floats vs ints in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83952 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug target/83496] MIPS BE: wrong code generates under "-Os -mbranch-cost=1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 Leslie Zhai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn --- Comment