[Bug c++/83591] -Wduplicated-branches fires in system headers in template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83591 --- Comment #2 from Tony E Lewis --- Further, even adding: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wduplicated-branches" ...doesn't appear to stop these warnings in this example code, though it does correctly silence the warning in non-template func

[Bug c++/83591] -Wduplicated-branches fires in system headers in template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83591 --- Comment #1 from Tony E Lewis --- Created attachment 42965 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42965&action=edit Intermediate file

[Bug c++/83591] New: -Wduplicated-branches fires in system headers in template instantiation

ubuntu3) 7.2.0. It looks to me from using godbolt.org, that the same problems persist in trunk (8.0.0 20171225). I suspect this is related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541 but it has differences: * I'm highlighting a true positive warning in a *system* header (rather

[Bug target/71009] g++: ICE on modified gdb/valarith.c with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009 Ryan Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at ryandesign dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug libgomp/83590] New: [nvptx] openacc reduction C regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83590 Bug ID: 83590 Summary: [nvptx] openacc reduction C regressions Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp

[Bug libgomp/83589] New: [nvptx] mode-transitions.c and private-variables.{c,f90} execution FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83589 Bug ID: 83589 Summary: [nvptx] mode-transitions.c and private-variables.{c,f90} execution FAILs Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/83588] New: Structs with two flexible arrays causes an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83588 Bug ID: 83588 Summary: Structs with two flexible arrays causes an internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 07:46:47PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 > > --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Patch submitted. > > https

[Bug c/83584] "ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type" -- no, not really

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584 --- Comment #6 from Keith Thompson --- Andreas: As I understand it, POSIX requires conversions between object pointers and function pointers to work only for the specific values returned by dlsym(). In any case, that's not directly relevant to t

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch submitted. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-12/msg00093.html

[Bug libgomp/82391] [openacc] acc_on_device not folded at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82391 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #42274|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gcov-profile/83266] [GCOV] A True if statement is wrongly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83266 --- Comment #5 from Yibiao Yang --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > (In reply to Yibiao Yang from comment #1) > > I am not very sure whether this is a bug or it is only the default behavior > > in gcov. > > > > Yes, it's expected.

[Bug gcov-profile/83587] New: A goto statement inside if statement leads the label incorrectly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83587 Bug ID: 83587 Summary: A goto statement inside if statement leads the label incorrectly marked as not executed in gcov Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83573] [8 Regression] invalid access introduced in predcom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83573 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONF

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 25 11:59:17 2017 New Revision: 255997 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255997&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/83488 * config/i386/i386.opt (-mavx512vpopcntdq

[Bug c/83586] New: [8 regression] Invalid -Wformat-truncation on stdio2.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83586 Bug ID: 83586 Summary: [8 regression] Invalid -Wformat-truncation on stdio2.h Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c/83584] "ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type" -- no, not really

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Note that POSIX requires such casts to work (for dlsym).

[Bug target/83585] [8 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: can't resolve `.text' {.text section} - `.LCOLDB0' {.text.unlikely section}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83585 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > The testcase is invalid. No I think the testcase is just undefined at runtime if that return is executed.

[Bug target/83585] [8 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: can't resolve `.text' {.text section} - `.LCOLDB0' {.text.unlikely section}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83585 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|