https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #14 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13)
> (In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> > [...]
> > > Here, you can see that on ELFv2, we always assu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83499
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 42926
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42926&action=edit
assembler file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83499
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 42925
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42925&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81791
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83475
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
The testcase in PR81791 comment 3 can be easily modified to trigger the ICE
reported here, so I believe this PR is a duplicate of PR81791.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83505
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
Following is the reduced code for reproducing this issue:
$ cat small.cint main()
{
int t = 1;
int *p = &t;
if (1) {
if (0)
return 0;
return 1;
}
}
$ gcc small.c -f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83505
Bug ID: 83505
Summary: [GCOV] a pointer assignment before label lead to
incorrect coverage in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83484
klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||klaus.doldinger6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83504
Bug ID: 83504
Summary: incorrect attribute const interpretation on function
overloads
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503
Bug ID: 83503
Summary: [8 Regression] bogus -Wattributes for const and pure
on function template specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83502
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Here's another test case with the same root cause (r190664):
$ cat u.C && gcc -S -Wall u.C
template
int __attribute__ ((warn_unused_result)) f (T) { return 0; }
template <>
int f (int) { return 1; }
void f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83498
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83502
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83502
Bug ID: 83502
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] bogus -Wattributes for
always_inline and noinline on function template
specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83398
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
Testcase in comment 4 seems to be fixed by r255833.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
With gcc-8.0.0-alpha20171217 snapshot it still reproduces for
powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe, but not for powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu.
Can it be a duplicate of PR83459?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
Bug ID: 83501
Summary: [8 Regression] strlen(a) not folded after strcpy(a,
"...")
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83423
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83423
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Dec 20 00:46:38 2017
New Revision: 255849
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255849&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't call targetm.calls.static_chain in non-static function
2017-12-20 T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83497
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I really doubt inlining is causing the miscompiling, only exposing it ...
And if I look at the difference, it looks more like a precision issue which
-ffast-math exposes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83500
Bug ID: 83500
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c fails on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81945
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81869
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83304
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with r254551 20171218 and r255822 20171219 and with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83498
Bug ID: 83498
Summary: bogus -Wattributes for always_inline and noinline on
distinct overloads
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83497
Bug ID: 83497
Summary: CPU2000 172.mgrid starts failing with r254730
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82593
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82593
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Dec 19 22:14:59 2017
New Revision: 255845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-12-19 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/82593
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83322
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83394
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83335
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83322
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Dec 19 22:09:00 2017
New Revision: 255844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83394 - always_inline vs. noinline no longer diagnosed
PR c++/83322
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83394
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Dec 19 22:09:00 2017
New Revision: 255844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83394 - always_inline vs. noinline no longer diagnosed
PR c++/83322
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 19 21:55:23 2017
New Revision: 255843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82975
* gcc.dg/pr82975.c: Only add -mtune=cortex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83493
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83126
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83493
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Dec 19 21:49:20 2017
New Revision: 255842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix sharing in translate_isl_ast_node_for
2017-12-19 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83492
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82213
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82231
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82231
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Dec 19 20:44:19 2017
New Revision: 255839
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255839&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82231
* g++.dg/cpp1z/nontype-auto14.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Is this still an issue? Or is it no longer a ppc64 issue?
$ uname -a
Linux gcc1-power7.osuosl.org 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 10
02:26:53 GMT 2017 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux
~/src/gcc/config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, patch
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #1 from Hauke Mehrtens ---
I only tested the GCC 7.X snapshot from 14. December 2017, not the GCC 8.X
version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81949
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81550
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83477
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83477
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Dec 19 20:13:04 2017
New Revision: 255837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83477
* tree-ssa-threadedge.c (record_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83483
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83490
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/calls.c.jj 2017-12-18 14:57:24.0 +0100
+++ gcc/calls.c 2017-12-19 19:46:40.466045457 +0100
@@ -2382,7 +2382,12 @@ compute_argument_addresses (struct arg_d
args[i].stack = ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Bug ID: 83496
Summary: MIPS BE: wrong code generates under "-Os
-mbranch-cost=1"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83162
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Dec 19 19:14:57 2017
New Revision: 255836
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255836&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/77608 - missing protection on trivially detectable runtime b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6)
> > Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01030.html
>
> Approved. Todo: testing.
Bootstrap and reg-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83495
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83495
Google-Autofuzz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552
--- Comment #6 from Dave Pagan ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> (In reply to Dave Pagan from comment #4)
> > It appears this is a case where ICEs are the result of poor error
> > detection/recovery with statement expressions in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83495
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83495
Bug ID: 83495
Summary: Segmentation Fault - 63915465
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83490
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83490
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Reproducible with just:
struct A {};
A operator<(A, A) { return A(); }
A operator>(A, A) { return A(); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83459
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82407
--- Comment #2 from Alexander
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83105
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
The problem went away after updating to a clean trunk,
re-bootstrapping and installing.
Let's try gcc-7 next...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83422
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83444
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 19 18:10:04 2017
New Revision: 255835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83444
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (strlen_che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #12)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> [...]
> > Here, you can see that on ELFv2, we always assume HW FP regs are avialable,
> > because we're forcing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83422
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Dec 19 17:50:54 2017
New Revision: 255834
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255834&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
SFN: don't drop markers for skipping var-tracking
Although debug marke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #82 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Dec 19 17:50:31 2017
New Revision: 255833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255833&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[SFN] start rtl block with label, then markers
Emitting markers befor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
--- Comment #15 from infinity0 at pwned dot gg ---
(In reply to infinity0 from comment #14)
> > it has a unified option (-ffile-prefix-map) [..]
>
> Oh, nice. That might save me some work, then.
>
> Could you bounce me the thread? Or failing tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83201
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 19, 2017 5:42:07 PM GMT+01:00, "pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83201
>
>--- Comment #18 from Pat Haugen ---
>(In reply to Martin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81010
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Oh, heh, the testcase isn't run at all on powerpc64le. That should be fixed,
too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83491
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And "in to account" should be "into account".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83491
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Thanks. One more nit:
/* If this is a square (x * x), we should check whether there are any
enough divisions by x on it's own to warrant waiting for that pass. */
Either whether there are any divisio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83491
--- Comment #3 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> There are multiple bugs:
> 1) the callers of execute_cse_reciprocals_1 ensure that def is SSA_NAME, so
> using:
> /* If this is a square (x * x), we should check whethe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83454
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 19 17:12:41 2017
New Revision: 255832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/83454
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cswtch-4.c: Require n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83491
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83494
Bug ID: 83494
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at
lra-assigns.c:1468: unable to find a register to spill
with -flive-range-shrinkage
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Dec 19 16:58:22 2017
New Revision: 255830
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255830&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumber being NU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Doesn't look to be the same correctness issue I'm tracking right now as I get a
mis-compare with and without those changes. Sigh.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83493
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83493
Bug ID: 83493
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr70045.c (internal compiler
error)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
