[Bug middle-end/83477] [8 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83477 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/82675] ICE in duplicate_loop_to_header_edge at gcc/cfgloopmanip.c:1207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82675 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Sorry I forgot about the patch, I've just sent it: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01220.html

[Bug tree-optimization/83444] [5/6/7 Regression] missing strlen optimization on a member array of a local struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83444 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug ipa/82801] [6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with Eigen and __attribute__((always_inline, flatten))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[6/7/8 Regression

[Bug tree-optimization/83329] internal compiler error: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:6327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83329 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83444] [5/6/7/8 Regression] missing strlen optimization on a member array of a local struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83444 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 19 07:44:07 2017 New Revision: 255806 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255806&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83444 * tree-ssa-strlen.c (strlen_che

[Bug ipa/82801] [6/7/8 Regression] Internal compiler error with Eigen and __attribute__((always_inline, flatten))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 19 07:41:30 2017 New Revision: 255805 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255805&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/82801 PR ipa/83346 * ipa-inline.c (flatten_

[Bug ipa/83346] inliner crash with attribute always_inline/flatten on a destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83346 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 19 07:41:30 2017 New Revision: 255805 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255805&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/82801 PR ipa/83346 * ipa-inline.c (flatten_

[Bug tree-optimization/80631] [6 Regression] Compiling with -O3 -mavx2 gives wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 19 07:39:24 2017 New Revision: 255804 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255804&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/80631 * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_creat

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #11) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > > Another bug: > > > > %lli isn't portable and casts to long long aren't needed. You should remove > > those, and

[Bug gcov-profile/83478] New: [GCOV] if condition with ~ unsigned short lead to incorrect coverage in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83478 Bug ID: 83478 Summary: [GCOV] if condition with ~ unsigned short lead to incorrect coverage in gcov Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug middle-end/83477] New: [8 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83477 Bug ID: 83477 Summary: [8 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O1 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/83476] New: Template argument deduction fails with reference auto template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83476 Bug ID: 83476 Summary: Template argument deduction fails with reference auto template parameter Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Another bug: > > %lli isn't portable and casts to long long aren't needed. You should remove > those, and use " HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC " instead of %lli in the

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) offset_int::from (min, UNSIGNED) works, thanks, but I need SIGNED as the argument because offrange is signed. I'll make these adjustments.

[Bug rtl-optimization/83475] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83475 Bug ID: 83475 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition) Product: gcc

[Bug c/83448] [7/8 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6) > Martin: what is the above code attempting to do? It's not clear to me > (though this may be -ENOCOFFEE on my part, sorry). The purpose of the set_caret_index cal

[Bug tree-optimization/83474] [8 Regression] ICE: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83474 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83189] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1050

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luis.machado at linaro dot org --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/83474] [8 Regression] ICE: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83474 --- Comment #3 from Luis Machado --- Another bit of information... On an early investigation (with an unoptimized compiler and unreduced testcase), this bit in profile-count.h was causing the assertion to fail: /* Return true if vlaue can be

[Bug target/52451] gcc w/i387 float generates fucom rather than fcom for floating point comparsons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451 --- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Please file a separate bug for hppa, just as we have separate bugs for the powerpc and s390 back end issues. Assuming hppa-hpux has working fenv.h, failure on hppa is probably a back-end

[Bug tree-optimization/83474] [8 Regression] ICE: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83474 --- Comment #2 from Luis Machado --- Backtrace: #0 fancy_abort (file=file@entry=0x157d9b2 "../../gcc/gcc/profile-count.h", line=line@entry=1038, function=function@entry=0x161d6a0 <_ZZNK13profile_count14probability_inES_E12__FUNCTION__> "probabi

[Bug target/83368] alloca after setjmp breaks PIC base reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368 James Clarke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/83474] [8 Regression] ICE: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83474 --- Comment #1 from Luis Machado --- during GIMPLE pass: aprefetch testcase.i:52:1: internal compiler error: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1038 update_call_from_tree (gimple_stmt_iterator * si_p, tree expr) ^ 0x6e9fd

[Bug tree-optimization/83474] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1038

gure --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171218 (experimental) (GCC) To reproduce: gcc -c -S testcase.i -O3 -fprefetch-loop-arrays

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [6/7/8 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Given that B and A have the same cost to compute, DOM, per design decision, leaves them alone. It makes no attempt to canonicalize on one or the other. While we know there's an equivalence between A and B

[Bug tree-optimization/78450] strlen(s) return value can be assumed to be less than the size of s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78450 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/83373] False positive reported by -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83373 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/83373] False positive reported by -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83373 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Dec 18 22:49:57 2017 New Revision: 255790 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255790&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/83373 - False positive reported by -Wstringop-overflow PR t

[Bug tree-optimization/78450] strlen(s) return value can be assumed to be less than the size of s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78450 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Dec 18 22:49:57 2017 New Revision: 255790 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255790&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/83373 - False positive reported by -Wstringop-overflow PR tr

[Bug c++/81976] bad is_standard_layout/has_unique_object_representations results with a chain of empty bases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81976 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com --

[Bug lto/83452] FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #42910|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug libstdc++/80761] std::set::insert_return_type uses wrong iterator type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80761 --- Comment #5 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Mon Dec 18 21:59:17 2017 New Revision: 255789 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255789&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-11-20 François Dumont PR libstdc++/80761 * in

[Bug target/83466] Wrong TLS GD sequence for ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83466 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83466] Wrong TLS GD sequence for ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83466 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Pasted the wrong sample: adrpx0, :tlsdesc:ti ldr w1, [x0, #:tlsdesc_lo12:ti] add w0, w0, :tlsdesc_lo12:ti .tlsdesccallti blr x1 mrs x1

[Bug lto/83452] FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-12-18 3:18 PM, John David Anglin wrote: >> This was changed for the Solaris linker BTW. Which didn't like UNDEF >> globals >> that cannot be resolved. Using weak should in theory work...

[Bug lto/83121] [8 Regression] ICE: in linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83121 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Here's a work-in-progress fix for this: diff --git a/gcc/ipa-devirt.c b/gcc/ipa-devirt.c index 540f038..f3d2e4a 100644 --- a/gcc/ipa-devirt.c +++ b/gcc/ipa-devirt.c @@ -1844,7 +1844,12 @@ add_type_duplicate

[Bug lto/83121] [8 Regression] ICE: in linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83121 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/83116] [6/7 Regression] Statement with no effect causes wrong code of static object constexpr method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83116 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] |[6/7 Regression] Statement

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- I am also seeing this. However, we have made some incompatible changes in the development phase of gcc-8. (We bumped the library version only once). This behavior could be the result of one of these changes

[Bug c++/83116] [6/7/8 Regression] Statement with no effect causes wrong code of static object constexpr method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83116 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Dec 18 21:25:16 2017 New Revision: 255788 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255788&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/83116 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression):

[Bug c++/83473] New: pragme problems with raw string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83473 Bug ID: 83473 Summary: pragme problems with raw string literals Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug demangler/83472] Signed Integer Overflow - 38176028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83472 --- Comment #1 from Google-Autofuzz --- Copy and paste error, sorry for calling you the binutils teams, gcc/demangler team. :)

[Bug rtl-optimization/83424] [6/7 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83424 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |6.4 Summary|[8 Regressio

[Bug sanitizer/83356] [7 Regression] excessive stack usage compiling with -O2 -fsanitize=bounds -fsanitize=object-size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83356 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'll try it tomorrow.

[Bug rtl-optimization/83424] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83424 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- This is latent on the branches; queued for backports.

[Bug demangler/83472] New: Signed Integer Overflow - 38176028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83472 Bug ID: 83472 Summary: Signed Integer Overflow - 38176028 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug target/83105] [8 regression] arm-*-*eabihf: error: -mfloat-abi=hard: selected processor lacks an FPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83105 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/83471] New: [7 regression] internal compiler error: in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3854

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83471 Bug ID: 83471 Summary: [7 regression] internal compiler error: in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3854 Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug c++/83469] union is not accepted as a valid class-key in template name resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83469 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/83462] [8 regression] c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c fails on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/83468] -Wuninitialized warning not emitted when it should

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83468 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Roest --- > -Wsystem-headers enables the warning. only when compiling with optimizations on. If you simply use "-Wuninitialized -Werror -Wall -Wextra -Wsystem-headers" then it compiles. Also "-Wuninitialized -Werro

[Bug lto/83452] FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-12-18 2:48 PM, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 > > --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > On December 18, 2017 7:38:17 PM

[Bug rtl-optimization/83424] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83424 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Dec 18 20:16:19 2017 New Revision: 255787 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255787&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rtlanal: dead_or_set_regno_p should handle CLOBBER (PR83424) In PR8

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 08:00:57PM +, daanvanvugt at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 > > --- Comment #7 from Daan van Vugt --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 --- Comment #7 from Daan van Vugt --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > That is not gfortran. What happens if (1) you remove all of the > options and (2) you actually invoke gfortran? gfortran -g read_urandom.f90 -o read_urandom ./read_ura

[Bug tree-optimization/83438] [8 Regression] 435.gromacs miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 18, 2017 7:31:45 PM GMT+01:00, law at redhat dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438 > >Jeffrey A. Law changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug lto/83452] FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 18, 2017 7:38:17 PM GMT+01:00, "dave.anglin at bell dot net" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 > >--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- >On 2017-

[Bug c++/83470] New: Type morphing nested lambda capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83470 Bug ID: 83470 Summary: Type morphing nested lambda capture Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug debug/83419] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/79650] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid c++ code with label arithmetic in convert_nontype_argument (pt.c:6515)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/71827] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code with non constant diff between two labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71827 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83336] Issues with displaying inlining chain for middle-end warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83336 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Dec 18 19:23:30 2017 New Revision: 255786 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255786&root=gcc&view=rev Log: testsuite: add coverage for diagnostics relating to inlining (PR tree-o

[Bug target/83387] PowerPC64: Infinite loops in do_reload() with -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387 --- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner --- ...and the parallel with the FP reg use (33 and 34) come from: expand_call(): valreg = hard_function_value (build_pointer_type (rettype), fndecl, NULL, (pass == 0)); har

[Bug c++/83469] New: union is not accepted as a valid class-key in template name resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83469 Bug ID: 83469 Summary: union is not accepted as a valid class-key in template name resolution Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c/83448] [7/8 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Another bug: if (dstref.offrange[0] == dstref.offrange[1] || dstref.offrange[1] > HOST_WIDE_INT_MAX) sprintf (offstr[0], "%lli", (long long) dstref.offrange[0].to_shwi ()); else sprintf (off

[Bug libstdc++/68430] std::is_constructible::value == true for unconstructible type T

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68430 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/68430] std::is_constructible::value == true for unconstructible type T

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68430 --- Comment #2 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Dec 18 18:46:30 2017 New Revision: 255785 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255785&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/68430 * testsuite/20_util/is_constructible/68430.c

[Bug target/83387] PowerPC64: Infinite loops in do_reload() with -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/83462] [8 regression] c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c fails on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c/83448] [7/8 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 42907 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42907&action=edit Work-in-progress patch, with reproducer, and more assertions

[Bug c++/83468] -Wuninitialized warning not emitted when it should

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83468 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- -Wsystem-headers enables the warning.

[Bug c/83448] [7/8 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8 Regression] ice in |[7/8 Regression] ice in

[Bug lto/83452] FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-12-18 10:37 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Can you check if the attached helps? It makes those local symbols defined > instead > (in the very first section we preserve, retainin

[Bug tree-optimization/83438] [8 Regression] 435.gromacs miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug middle-end/83460] [8 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pr79095-4.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83460 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/83460] [8 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pr79095-4.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83460 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Dec 18 18:13:20 2017 New Revision: 255784 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255784&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/83460 * g++.dg/pr79095-4.C: Remove compromise

[Bug middle-end/83460] [8 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pr79095-4.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83460 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Actually the 79095-4 test is testing that we do loop distribution and propagation of constants into the the memset call and that after propagation we realize there's a bogus path that we actually can't remov

[Bug c++/83300] Segmentation fault with template and __attribute__((vector_size (sizeof(int) * N)));

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83300 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk.

[Bug c++/83300] Segmentation fault with template and __attribute__((vector_size (sizeof(int) * N)));

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83300 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 18 17:52:13 2017 New Revision: 255783 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255783&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/83300 * decl2.c (save_template_attributes): Add fla

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > > Ugh: > > value_range_type rng = get_range_info (offset, &min, > > &max); > > i

[Bug target/83466] Wrong TLS GD sequence for ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83466 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >ldr x1, [x0, #:tlsdesc_lo12:ti] This most likely should be a 32bit load also.

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Ugh: > value_range_type rng = get_range_info (offset, &min, &max); > if (rng == VR_RANGE) > { >

[Bug tree-optimization/83440] Internal compiler error: in vect_transform_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8692

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83440 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/83459] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/83468] New: -Wuninitialized warning not emitted when it should

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83468 Bug ID: 83468 Summary: -Wuninitialized warning not emitted when it should Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug tree-optimization/83440] Internal compiler error: in vect_transform_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8692

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83440 --- Comment #2 from Geir Johansen --- Created attachment 42906 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42906&action=edit thr.i

[Bug target/83467] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1476: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage -m8bit-idiv

king-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-amd64 Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171218 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- The ICE should be fixed, but not closing this because of remarks in Comment 4 and here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01174.html

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Dec 18 16:44:35 2017 New Revision: 255781 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255781&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/83463 * gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c (built

[Bug middle-end/83463] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in builtin_memr ef, at gimple-ssa-warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/83239] False positive from -Wstringop-overflow on simple std::vector code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239 --- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yes. Very much want to keep this open -- I've got a patch for the missed optimization, but need to recover the tests I'd written and somehow lost before submitting.

[Bug c++/59930] template friend declarations, namespaces, and explicit instantiations don't mix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59930 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59930] template friend declarations, namespaces, and explicit instantiations don't mix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59930 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Mon Dec 18 16:30:58 2017 New Revision: 255780 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255780&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/59930] template friend injection https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat

[Bug middle-end/83460] [8 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pr79095-4.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83460 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3) > > I am a bit concerned though. Didn't these failures show up during your > > regression testing Martin? > > I just ran t

[Bug libstdc++/83237] Values returned by std::poisson_distribution are not distributed correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83237 Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||3dw4rd at v

[Bug rtl-optimization/80791] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/sms-1.c fail2 starting with r247885

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- FYI: I am testing on native powerpc64 hardware and tried this on both power7 and power8 systems.

  1   2   >