try_ready, at haifa-sched.c:7524
}
^
0x1431e02 try_ready(rtx_insn*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20171217/work/gcc-8-20171217/gcc/haifa-sched.c:7520
0x14ac529 init_ready_list
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20171217/work/gcc-8-20171217/gcc/sched-ebb.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83361
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
No, it probably needs backports.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83361
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
Should this PR be closed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Dec 18 03:31:05 2017
New Revision: 255772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255772&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/83446 - Bootstrap failed on i686
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Actually we should just drop the libgo/go/exp directory. I don't know why it's
still there. It should have been dropped years ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #3 from Martin Seb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83443
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
r247448 build was okay while 247726 shows the two failures. I think this
implies the failures were introduced
by r247444:
2017-05-01 Martin Sebor
* tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83443
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83453
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Caused by r255469 (the test was added belatedly, in r27).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83453
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
It's an unintended effect of warning during folding. The folder sees the
arguments propagated before the if conditional has been evaluated and before
the call has been eliminated as unreachable. The only way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456
Bug ID: 83456
Summary: -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy
in an inline function
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83455
Bug ID: 83455
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-22.c (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10)
> Author: redi
> Date: Thu Dec 14 21:49:03 2017
> New Revision: 255666
#ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_SENDFILE
- off_t offset = 0;
- const auto n = ::sendfile(out.fd, in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77734
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Also on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83454
Bug ID: 83454
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cswtch-4.c and cswtch-5.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
More similar fails:
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101010-4 cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o-cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o link,
-std=c++0x -flto -g -r -nostdlib
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20101010-4 cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o-cp_lto_2010101
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83453
Bug ID: 83453
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/Wattributes.c -std=gnu++98 (test
for warnings, line 404)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452
Bug ID: 83452
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/save_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83451
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Similar fails:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_10.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/matmul_10.f90 -O3 -fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83451
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
The subreg is strange.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #17 from T B ---
Okay, sorry.
Thanks for your efforts!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83451
Bug ID: 83451
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_10.f90 -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops
-ftracer -finline-functions (ICE)
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83450
Bug ID: 83450
Summary: FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/pthread18185.cc (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16275
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asif_bahrainwala at hotmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83449
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC is correct here. Strings don't paste together.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83449
--- Comment #1 from Asif ---
g++ main.cpp
main.cpp:10:15: error: pasting ""a"" and ""b"" does not give a valid
preprocessing token
char *i=A("a","b");
^
main.cpp:6:16: note: in definition of macro ‘A’
#define A(a,b) a ## b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83449
Bug ID: 83449
Summary: incorrect ## preprocessing with string
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preproce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-11-01 00:00:00 |2017-12-17
--- Comment #2 from John
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71641
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Last reconf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #16 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
As for ioctl():
Linux: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/ioctl.2.html
FreeBSD: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ioctl&sektion=2
Plan9:
https://github.com/brho/plan9/blob/master/sys/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68643
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
This problem has existed since before revision 249397.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
Bug ID: 83448
Summary: ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at
input.c:1507
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83442
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Program is stuck in a loop which repeatedly calls $$dyncall:
(gdb) bt
#0 $$dyncall () at ../../../gcc/libgcc/config/pa/milli64.S:237
#1 0x0055b82c in try_init_one_plugin (plugin=0xfae140)
at ../../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83447
Bug ID: 83447
Summary: parameter after function parameter pack gets
improperly deduced
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83446
Bug ID: 83446
Summary: [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on i686
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83121
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Just to be clear: the attached testcase triggers the ICE both on
X86_64 and ppc64le.
libunwind-exceptions
--enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-linker-build-id
--with-linker-hash-style=gnu --enable-plugin --enable-initfini-array --with-isl
--enable-libmpx --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --without-cuda-driver
--enable-gnu-indirect-function --with-tune=native
Thread model: posix
gcc ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #15 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Thanks Oleg!
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #14)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #13)
> Cache line sizes of original SH implementations:
>
> SH2,SH2A,SH3: 16 bytes
>
47 matches
Mail list logo
