https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83037
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83042
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Created attachment 42647
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42647&action=edit
v3 of reproducer, still smaller
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83042
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Created attachment 42646
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42646&action=edit
v2 of reproducer, much smaller
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83042
--- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Shorter version with only 3 files with 189 lines in total. For the ICE to
appear it is important that the modules reside in separate files. (?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-11/msg00103.html fixes
gfortran for the tests in comment 0, 5 and 11, but not for the test in comment
12:
internal compiler error: tree check: expecte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549
--- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle ---
After a minor test tweak.
$ gfc -static pr78549.f
$ time ./a.out
real0m24.049s
user0m22.941s
sys 0m0.962s
$ gfc6 -static pr78549.f
$ time ./a.out
real0m22.838s
user0m22.718s
sys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83042
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Have to extend the range to r253161 as possible earliest svn version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82091
--- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I can see this also for trunk r253992:
In file included from ../../gcc/unique-ptr-tests.cc:23:
In file included from ../../gcc/../include/unique-ptr.h:77:
In file included from
/Applications/Xcode.app/Conten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82091
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83042
Bug ID: 83042
Summary: [8.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #13 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Correction to Comment 11. That example gives the *correct* result on 6.4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #12 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
The second adds a select case and print to get at the result value before its
handed back. This produces an ICE with 6.4.1, 7.2.1, and 8.0.0 (20171028)
character(3), target :: a = 'foo'
cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #11 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Paul, I'm organizing all my bug report examples, and ran across these two test
cases from September that I can't find I ever reported. They are VERY similar
to the original example I posted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82961
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01649.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82961
--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Nov 18 23:30:50 2017
New Revision: 254920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[vms] Add missing vmsdbgout_early_finish
2017-11-19 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796
Bug 53796 depends on bug 44292, which changed state.
Bug 44292 Summary: [libgfortran ABI breakage] Increase internal size of RECL=
of the OPEN statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29602
Bug 29602 depends on bug 44292, which changed state.
Bug 44292 Summary: [libgfortran ABI breakage] Increase internal size of RECL=
of the OPEN statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Bug 56818 depends on bug 44292, which changed state.
Bug 44292 Summary: [libgfortran ABI breakage] Increase internal size of RECL=
of the OPEN statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83041
Bug ID: 83041
Summary: redundant assignment from member array not eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
--- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Nov 18 22:05:13 2017
New Revision: 254918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254918&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 44292 Handle large record lengths
Now that the ABI supports large reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83011
--- Comment #2 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Created attachment 42644
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42644&action=edit
Preprocessed translation unit of timer.c
Thanks Martin for your response.
I attached the result of the following
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83038
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
I should also mention that the warning isn't without merit even if the path
where the index is strictly negative doesn't appear in the source code. As far
as anyone can tell, the array index would be negative
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83038
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83040
Bug ID: 83040
Summary: __attribute__((always_inline)) causes
internal_compiler_error (segmentation fault)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Hmm, on RTL signs do not matter. I'd say strip the bogus cases from the
> existing tests and "duplicate" them into new variants using -fwrapv? Thus
> only apply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70932
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83036
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83036
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Nov 18 16:56:21 2017
New Revision: 254916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 83036 Make NEXTREC specifier for INQUIRE work for large record numbers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101
gccbugs at jbapple dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugs at jbapple dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
--- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Nov 18 16:13:20 2017
New Revision: 254915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 44292 Enable large record lengths in OPEN and INQUIRE statements
This i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26426
--- Comment #4 from Chris Lattner ---
Works for me, I'm not following GCC bugs these days. Thanks,
-Chris
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83012
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83012
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Nov 18 15:53:21 2017
New Revision: 254914
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254914&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-18 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/83012
* expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83032
--- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin ---
> I don't think that's one of the cases where the C++ standard allows elision
Yes, you're right (currently I try to convince C++ standard pepole that
allowing it could be benefical).
But C does not forbit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83037
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Yes, the patch isn't commited yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83039
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83039
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> Can you please try again with current trunk: r254913?
> There are a lot of IPA related fixes after 254772.
Looks fixed by 254913 to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83037
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
I just tried revision 254913 and it still looks broken to me.
$ ../results.254913/bin/g++ -c -w -O2 bug395-min.cc
during GIMPLE pass: einline
bug395-min.cc: In function ‘int e()’:
bug395-min.cc:16:43: inte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82961
--- Comment #8 from Tristan Gingold ---
Looks OK.
> On 18 Nov 2017, at 10:21, vries at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82961
>
> Tom de Vries changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83039
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Can you please try again with current trunk: r254913?
There are a lot of IPA related fixes after 254772.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83039
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> Actually, I cannot reproduce the issue at all.
Platform is x86_64.
Reduced code is
$ more bug396-min.cc
template struct g {
b ad;
c e;
};
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83039
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67075
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39466
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26426
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83036
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83039
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82960
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82961
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|sebastian.huber@embedded-br |tgingold at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83038
--- Comment #2 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Created attachment 42643
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42643&action=edit
Full preprocesssed source file
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> This is a .i file; have the sourc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83039
Bug ID: 83039
Summary: ice in estimate_node_size_and_time, at
ipa-fnsummary.c:2750
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
55 matches
Mail list logo
