ommit 179137d80882c7b6b58ee59eacf56fe6f8cc7596) and
it's reproducible
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/cross/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/a3f/prjs/gcc/install/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 2017 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2017 Fre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82952
--- Comment #1 from Ahmad Fatoum ---
Created attachment 42587
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42587&action=edit
File that hangs g++
I didn't manage to reduce it by much, because of the halting problem. At least
it reliably s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82952
Bug ID: 82952
Summary: Hang compiling with g++ -fsanitize=undefined
-Wduplicated-branches
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82932
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82932
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Nov 11 21:54:41 2017
New Revision: 254660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-11 Janus Weil
PR fortran/82932
* res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62011
--- Comment #16 from Travis Downs ---
Also, this is fixed for Skylake for tzcnt and lzcnt but not popcnt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Or I should just add -fwrapv since those tests were added to test an RTL
transformation ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00615.html ).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
Bug ID: 82951
Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040409-1.c undefined behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82950
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82950
Bug ID: 82950
Summary: possible strlen optimization for memcmp/strcmp of
arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Nov 11 18:04:21 2017
New Revision: 254659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254659&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c/81117
* doc/extend.texi (attribute n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82948
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-*-linux
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82948
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Nov 11 17:43:48 2017
New Revision: 254658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/82948 - prefix.c:202:15: error: 'char* strncpy(char*, const c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62011
Travis Downs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||travis.downs at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79964
PeteVine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82798
--- Comment #2 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Other points:
6/ -Wsuggest-final-types and -Wsuggest-final-methods should be mentioned for
C++ (and maybe Objective-C++) only.
7/ -Wc++11-compat and -Wc++14-compat are present in the -Wall list but without
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81056
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Nov 11 16:11:50 2017
New Revision: 254655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254655&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-08-20 John David Anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Nov 11 15:53:18 2017
New Revision: 254654
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254654&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-02-25 John David Angli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82949
--- Comment #1 from alexander ---
Created attachment 42586
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42586&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82949
Bug ID: 82949
Summary: internal compiler error: in
cp_parser_late_return_type_opt, at cp/parser.c:16698
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81486
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Romeo ---
Here's a snippet that seems to reproduce this bug, even without an explicit
deduction guide:
template
struct foo
{
template
foo(Us...) { }
};
int main()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82948
Bug ID: 82948
Summary: [8 Regression] prefix.c:202:15: error: 'char*
strncpy(char*, const char*, size_t)' destination
unchanged after copying no bytes
[-Werror=stri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82937
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80871
Vittorio Romeo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot
com
---
24 matches
Mail list logo
