specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/bruno/software/gcc-svn-install/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/bruno/software/gcc-svn-install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-svn/configure
--prefix=/home/bruno/software/gcc-svn-install
Thread model: po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82839
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
You can simplify the function to
int ts;
g();
*t = ts;
h(&ts);
Part of the analysis is not flow-sensitive: we see that ts escapes, we deduce
that g() can write to it, so ts might be initialized and we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82839
Bug ID: 82839
Summary: missing -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82002
--- Comment #11 from dansan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dansan
Date: Sat Nov 4 22:38:43 2017
New Revision: 254412
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254412&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82002 Part 2: Correct non-immediate offset/invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79933
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:18:22PM +, tulipawn at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79933
>
> --- Comment #5 from PeteVine ---
> You're right, sorry for the confusion. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82838
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82838
Bug ID: 82838
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa failed w/
store-merging
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79933
--- Comment #5 from PeteVine ---
You're right, sorry for the confusion. It seems I skimmed over the wall of
errors too quickly while the last one came from a different source file.
According to my own results in bug #77730, I was somehow able to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82837
Bug ID: 82837
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid
expression as operand
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82836
Bug ID: 82836
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82835
Bug ID: 82835
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on valid code with -fopenmp
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Sat Nov 4 19:40:23 2017
New Revision: 254411
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254411&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-04 Andreas Tobler
PR libgcc/82635
* config/i386/f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82834
Bug ID: 82834
Summary: Cross-compiler doesn't find correct multilib for
target
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82833
Bug ID: 82833
Summary: [concepts] Out-of-line definition of nested class
template errors with constraint (ICE)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82784
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #5)
> You probably hit something that's just not yet implemented:
>
> trans-expr.c:
>
> (gdb) list 4083,4096
> 4083case GFC_ISYM_LBOUND:
> 4084case GFC_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82796
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82796
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Nov 4 17:16:39 2017
New Revision: 254410
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254410&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-01 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/82796
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82796
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Nov 4 16:41:09 2017
New Revision: 254409
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254409&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-04 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/82796
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79933
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70330
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70330
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Nov 4 13:54:27 2017
New Revision: 254406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254406&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-04 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/70330
* gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70072
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 82568, which changed state.
Bug 82568 Summary: [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69815
Bug 69815 depends on bug 82568, which changed state.
Bug 82568 Summary: [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70072
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29600
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed on trunk, closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29600
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Nov 4 13:20:32 2017
New Revision: 254405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254405&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-04 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/29600
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82832
Bug ID: 82832
Summary: [8 Regression] Broken PGO LTO bootstrap on x86_64
after r254379
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831
Bug ID: 82831
Summary: [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap on i586-linux-gnu
after r254379
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82830
Bug ID: 82830
Summary: short rotate with truncated length
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57426
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 81735, which changed state.
Bug 81735 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] double free or corruption (fasttop) error
(SIGABRT) with character(:) and custom return type with allocatable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81735
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81735
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Nov 4 09:07:09 2017
New Revision: 254404
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254404&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-04 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/81735
* trans-decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79933
--- Comment #3 from PeteVine ---
In gcc 8, -std=f2003 is required to overcome the issue but there's another
failure later on:
gfortran -c -O2 -std=f2003solverinterface.f90
solverinterface.f90:108:9:
real*4 fpar(16) ! hint by Shibo
39 matches
Mail list logo
