https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82803
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Related to PR 81501.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81501
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82803
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82803
Bug ID: 82803
Summary: Wildly excessive calls to __tls_get_addr with
optimizations enabled.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #29 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Sven from comment #28)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #27)
> > gcc 8 adds -Wpacked-not-aligned; does that fix this bug?
>
> I couldn't find documentation on what this switch is suppo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22195
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #28 from Sven ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #27)
> gcc 8 adds -Wpacked-not-aligned; does that fix this bug?
I couldn't find documentation on what this switch is supposed to do. Can you
point me in the right direction? I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801
--- Comment #1 from Anthony Lee ---
creduce reduces this to the below. However, I'm not sure this is the reason for
the original ICE since the error goes away if one writes inline double
B::m_fn1() const { ... }
template
class A {
public:
A()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #33 from Eric Gallager ---
*** Bug 78077 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31233
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67314
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28492
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82798
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40503
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82200
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drikosev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82787
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82802
Bug ID: 82802
Summary: Potential UBSAN error with pointer difference (32-bits
mode)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #25 from spoa at eircom dot net ---
Many thanks Manu. The to_UCN.sh script works well. The only trouble was that
my include file also contain unusual characters with diacritic marks and the
script changes these file names to UCN als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801
Bug ID: 82801
Summary: Internal compiler error with Eigen and
__attribute__((always_inline, flatten))
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82798
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82800
Bug ID: 82800
Summary: Incorrect warning on "may be used uninitialized in
this function" in variadic template code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82799
Bug ID: 82799
Summary: [8 Regression] -Wunused-but-set-variable false
positive
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82798
Bug ID: 82798
Summary: Inconsistent descriptions for warning options in
documentation
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82797
Bug ID: 82797
Summary: Suggest -Wshadow suppression for nested if/else
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #30 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #29)
> Is there anything left to do here? Or can this PR be closed.
As both LibreOffice and GHC now build without issues on Debian powerpcspe with
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82683
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Excellent, thanks for testing! I'll backport it next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #29 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is there anything left to do here? Or can this PR be closed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 1 21:52:21 2017
New Revision: 254328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254328&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/82778
PR rtl-optimization/82597
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82778
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 1 21:52:21 2017
New Revision: 254328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254328&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/82778
PR rtl-optimization/82597
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40503
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
As far as I understand the general state of DFP support in GCC: the basic
functionality generally works without needing much maintenance, but no-one
is actively fixing DFP bugs or updating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82002
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
pr82002-2a.c as well as pr82002-2b.c still ICE on the current trunk on
x86_64-linux:
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82002-2a.c: In function
'b':
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82776
--- Comment #9 from AK ---
Are we also taking advantage of this statement in the standard:
> An iteration statement that performs no input/output operations, does not
> access volatile objects, and performs no
synchronization or atomic operatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Tobler ---
The gcc5 branch is closed, so I can not commit there. In the ports tree we're
on gcc6 as default gcc. We still can build gcc5. I certainly can talk to Gerald
to make an exception or whatever and patch the g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #13 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
(In reply to Andreas Tobler from comment #12)
> Will soon commit a fix, for gcc6/7/8 on FreeBSD > 9.3. Older gcc's and OS
> releases will not be supported by this fix.
Thanks a lot!
But is there no cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82796
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293
--- Comment #11 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
I rather suspect that was why I had deleted the tree :-)
That's a pity. I am afraid moving from one country to another caused
this PR to get lost.
Cheers
Paul
On 1 November 2017 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82683
--- Comment #17 from Steve Ellcey ---
Yes, this fixed my SPEC problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Dominique,
>
> Do you still have 5-branch and, if so, could you commit the patch to it
> please?
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
Paul,
The 5-branch is now closed.
Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82783
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
This is fixed by the patch for PR81447, which I am just about to submit.
Cheers
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82796
Bug ID: 82796
Summary: Private+equivalence in used module breaks compilation
of pure function
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> > > Revision r242875 caused pr79344. Is there any plan to back port the fixes
> > > to
> > > the 6 branch?
> >
> > That's a good question. What is your opin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 1 17:24:35 2017
New Revision: 254319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-01 Andre Vehreschild
Paul Thomas
PR fortran/78
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
--- Comment #9 from Michael Thayer ---
Created attachment 42517
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42517&action=edit
Assembly output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
--- Comment #8 from Michael Thayer ---
Created attachment 42516
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42516&action=edit
Preprocessor output (almost identical to source)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
--- Comment #7 from Michael Thayer ---
Created attachment 42515
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42515&action=edit
g++ -v -save-temps -c -Wextra -Werror -fsanitize=address -o test.o test.cpp >
gcc-out 2>&1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
--- Comment #6 from Michael Thayer ---
Created attachment 42514
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42514&action=edit
New test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
--- Comment #5 from Michael Thayer ---
This works for the test case I provided above, but not for our original source.
Attaching a new test case. This one is slightly more involved, as it requires
both g++ and address sanitizer. Should I creat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82777
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82790
--- Comment #2 from Eugene Zelenko ---
Just a little bit of background: a lot of legacy C code was converted to C++,
so a lot of type casts were necessary to compile it properly. Gradually char *
are converted to const char *, so -Wuseless-cast w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82783
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82777
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 1 17:09:14 2017
New Revision: 254317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/82777 fix path normalization for dot-dot
PR libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40503
--- Comment #6 from Fred J. Tydeman ---
No. All evaluations should be as if 34 digits of precision.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82683
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Should be fixed on trunk now. Steve, could you see if it fixes the
SPEC problem for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69567
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 1 16:40:42 2017
New Revision: 254315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Fix bug in giving up placing REG_DEAD notes (PR82683)
Whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 1 16:40:42 2017
New Revision: 254315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Fix bug in giving up placing REG_DEAD notes (PR82683)
Whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 1 16:40:42 2017
New Revision: 254315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Fix bug in giving up placing REG_DEAD notes (PR82683)
When
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82683
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 1 16:40:42 2017
New Revision: 254315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Fix bug in giving up placing REG_DEAD notes (PR82683)
Whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82787
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82683
--- Comment #14 from Steve Ellcey ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13)
> I have a simpler patch. It is testing...
Can you attach your patch to this defect so I can test it as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82795
Bug ID: 82795
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in predicate_mem_writes, at
tree-if-conv.c:2251
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82216
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82787
--- Comment #6 from Ev Drikos ---
1) the exact version of GCC:
$ gcc7 --version
gcc7 (GCC) 7.1.1 20170622
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82787
--- Comment #5 from Ev Drikos ---
Created attachment 42513
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42513&action=edit
syslog.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82774
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gmx dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82794
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82794
Bug ID: 82794
Summary: ICE: Cannot allocate memory for concept with default
argument
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82783
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #2 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82793
--- Comment #1 from Vorfeed Canal ---
Example closer to real code:
#include "xmmintrin.h"
inline __attribute__((target("avx"),visibility("hidden"))) __m128 foo(__m128 a,
__m128 b) {
return _mm_add_ps(a, b);
}
inline __attribute__((target("ss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82793
Bug ID: 82793
Summary: __attribute__((target("sse"))) causes call throught
ifunc
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82767
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82787
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The bug submission process asked you to read https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ which
says how to do it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82768
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82771
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82787
--- Comment #3 from Ev Drikos ---
Created attachment 42512
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42512&action=edit
On Darwin 10.13: "cpp7 /usr/include/syslog.h>cpp7syslog.h"
If this isn't what you expect, please feel free to tell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82776
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
At some point, we could also think of taking advantage of what the C++ standard
(for instance) says:
"[intro.progress]
The implementation may assume that any thread will eventually do one of the
following:
(1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45891
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpf at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82783
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82787
--- Comment #2 from Ev Drikos ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you provide the preprocessed source?
What command I should run?
Ev. Drikos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79392
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82737
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Matti Bryce from comment #14)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Matti Bryce from comment #7)
> > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > > > Confirmed with c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80554
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80554
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 1 12:39:48 2017
New Revision: 254303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/80554
* decl.c (build_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80554
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Added by hand because I used the wrong file for the -F option on commit to
7-branch:
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 1 11:29:07 2017
New Revision: 254299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254299&root=gcc&view
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850
--- Comment #28 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #27)
> Author: pault
> Date: Wed Nov 1 11:29:07 2017
> New Revision: 254299
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254299&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> 2017-11-01 Paul T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82726
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Predcom uses below comparison function to make sure references in chain are
sorted in lexicographic order. That is, inter-iteration deps are sorted in
iteration order; intra-iteration deps are sort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82565
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850
--- Comment #27 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 1 11:29:07 2017
New Revision: 254299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/80850
* trans_expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82790
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82789
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
