[Bug c/82599] New: Assignments from statically initialized flexible arrays copy too much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82599 Bug ID: 82599 Summary: Assignments from statically initialized flexible arrays copy too much Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/73650] powerpc: -mcpu=e500mc hits ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73650 --- Comment #12 from Arseny Solokha --- This PR seems to be fixed more than a year ago, and the fix backported to all supported branches. Is it safe to close it now?

[Bug rtl-optimization/82597] [8 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug target/82592] [8 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207 (error: insn does not satisfy its constraints)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82592 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/82597] [8 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug lto/82598] [8 Regression] lto debugobj lacks .note.GNU-stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82598 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|lto debugobj lack

[Bug rtl-optimization/82597] ICE at -O2 and -O3 x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/82598] New: lto debugobj lacks .note.GNU-stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82598 Bug ID: 82598 Summary: lto debugobj lacks .note.GNU-stack Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto As

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 Campbell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rlcamp.pdx at gmail dot com --- Comment #21 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/82597] New: ICE at -O2 and -O3 x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597 Bug ID: 82597 Summary: ICE at -O2 and -O3 x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug tree-optimization/82596] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds index into string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82596 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug tree-optimization/82583] missing -Warray-bounds on out-of-bounds inner indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82583 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug middle-end/82556] [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4307

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Indeed started with my r253710. If there is something wrong on the > constraints on the patterns, please let me know. The constraints are ok. I'll probably

[Bug target/82582] not quite optimal code for -2*x*y - 3*z: could use one less LEA for smaller code without increasing critical path latency for any input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82582 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- For AARCH64 the correct thing is able to be produced: foo32: sub w2, w2, w2, lsl 2 ; w2 = z - z<<2; (rather -z*3) neg w0, w0, lsl 1 ; w0 = x * -2 maddw0, w0, w1, w2

[Bug tree-optimization/82583] missing -Warray-bounds on out-of-bounds inner indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82583 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82596] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds index into string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82596 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82596] New: missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds index into string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82596 Bug ID: 82596 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds index into string literal Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/82595] bootstrap fails in libsanitizer on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks like: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg01043.html is no longer part of the sources due to the last merge.

[Bug sanitizer/82595] New: bootstrap fails in libsanitizer on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595 Bug ID: 82595 Summary: bootstrap fails in libsanitizer on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Se

[Bug middle-end/82569] [8 regression] failure in 177.mesa cpu2000 test case after r253530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/82594] Please provide better parameter / argument mismatch warnings/notes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82594 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/82594] New: Please provide better parameter / argument mismatch warnings/notes

ng the above, we get, with current trunk (gcc version 8.0.0 20171017): ~~~ $ /opt/gcc/bin/g++ mismatch.cc -c -o mismatch mismatch.cc: In function ‘void initialize()’: mismatch.cc:12:35: error: cannot convert ‘void (*)(S2*)’ to ‘S1*’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘void set_delete_thread(S1*, void (

[Bug middle-end/82556] [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4307

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed started with my r253710. If there is something wrong on the constraints on the patterns, please let me know.

[Bug c++/82593] Internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_array, at cp/typeck2.c:1294

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82593 --- Comment #1 from Antonio Ospite --- Created attachment 42387 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42387&action=edit Parenthesized array member initializer with enum as indices Adding a more concise test program. Using an arra

[Bug c++/82593] New: Internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_array, at cp/typeck2.c:1294

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82593 Bug ID: 82593 Summary: Internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_array, at cp/typeck2.c:1294 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug libstdc++/82554] uniform_real_distribution can generate the upper endpoint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82554 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Almost all of it is saying things you *don't need to do*. You just need to send an email.

[Bug web/66802] Some of the Bugzilla Bug fields descriptions do not reflect GCC development

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66802 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-07-08 00:00:00 |2017-10-17 --- Comment #2 from Jonatha

[Bug fortran/82589] ICE in gfc_get_pdt_instance, at fortran/decl.c:3278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82589 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82587] ICE in get_pdt_constructor, at fortran/resolve.c:1185

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82587 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus warning when inlining or unrolling: "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/58150] debug info about definition of enum class not emitted if the declaration was already used in a class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58150 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Ben Longbons from comment #9) > The ones I've filed are: #54533, #58150, #80466 > > But there are quite a few more at > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&component=de

[Bug debug/43119] debug info vs. scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43119 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/64611] Using a << operator inside an overloaded << operator gives compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64611 J. van Oosten changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #9 from J. van Oosten

[Bug c++/64611] Using a << operator inside an overloaded << operator gives compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64611 --- Comment #8 from J. van Oosten --- Confirmed it works as expected with GCC 5.4.0

[Bug target/82592] New: [8 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207 (error: insn does not satisfy its constraints)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82592 Bug ID: 82592 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207 (error: insn does not satisfy its constraints) Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug c++/58601] [meta-bug] alignas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58601 Bug 58601 depends on bug 71821, which changed state. Bug 71821 Summary: [6/7/8 regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (incorrect argument for alignas): unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug c++/71821] [6/7/8 regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (incorrect argument for alignas): unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71821 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71821] [6/7/8 regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (incorrect argument for alignas): unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71821 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 17 19:49:06 2017 New Revision: 253828 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253828&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-17 Paolo Carlini PR c++/71821 * g++

[Bug c++/71368] [concepts] ICE on constrained compound requirement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71368 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 17 19:36:49 2017 New Revision: 253826 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253826&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-17 Paolo Carlini PR c++/71368 * g++

[Bug c++/71368] [concepts] ICE on constrained compound requirement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71368 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71251] [6/7/8 regression] ICE on invalid code, with unusual template name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71251 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Related to PR71220.

[Bug c++/82478] Rejects valid access to private member type that should be allowed by friend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82478 --- Comment #4 from Corey Tabaka --- Ah, you are right. Late night mixup... The outer class friend should work though, correct?

[Bug c++/70377] "unexpected AST" and "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" from throw in simple constexpr fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70377 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/70377] "unexpected AST" and "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" from throw in simple constexpr fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70377 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67735] internal compiler error while trying to use __direct_bases to create parallel hierarchy of classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67735 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/65970] [C++14] Endless loop with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65970 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jason at gcc

[Bug middle-end/82569] [8 regression] failure in 177.mesa cpu2000 test case after r253530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 42385 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42385&action=edit test case that shows the problem This is a cut down single function test case that shows the problem

[Bug c++/64611] Using a << operator inside an overloaded << operator gives compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64611 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82591] New: [8 Regression] [graphite] Compile-time hog w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82591 Bug ID: 82591 Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] Compile-time hog w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-ti

[Bug other/82590] New: auto-host.h error: declaration does not declare anything

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82590 Bug ID: 82590 Summary: auto-host.h error: declaration does not declare anything Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/82586] ICE: write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82586 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/82554] uniform_real_distribution can generate the upper endpoint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82554 --- Comment #3 from Ben Longbons --- There is DR2524 for the [0, 1) case. Otherwise, filing bugs there looks really complicated. I've given you a reproducer. That's as much as I'm capable of.

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 --- Comment #9 from Ben Longbons --- The ones I've filed are: #54533, #58150, #80466 But there are quite a few more at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&component=debug&list_id=190134&product=gcc

[Bug fortran/82589] ICE in gfc_get_pdt_instance, at fortran/decl.c:3278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82589 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- These variants are processed without any complaints : $ cat z2.f90 module m type t(a) integer, len, private :: a end type end program p use m type(t(:)), allocatable :: x print *, x end

[Bug fortran/82589] New: ICE in gfc_get_pdt_instance, at fortran/decl.c:3278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82589 Bug ID: 82589 Summary: ICE in gfc_get_pdt_instance, at fortran/decl.c:3278 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/82588] New: missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Bug ID: 82588 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/82587] New: ICE in get_pdt_constructor, at fortran/resolve.c:1185

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82587 Bug ID: 82587 Summary: ICE in get_pdt_constructor, at fortran/resolve.c:1185 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c/81404] suggested hints for standard C macros should avoid GCC predefined macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81404 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01083.html

[Bug fortran/82586] ICE: write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82586] ICE: write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82586 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- Other invalid snippets : $ cat z2.f90 program p type t(a integer, kind :: a real(a) :: x end type end $ cat z3.f90 program p type t(a, a) integer, kind :: a integer, len :

[Bug fortran/82586] New: ICE: write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82586 Bug ID: 82586 Summary: ICE: write_symbol(): bad module symbol Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Tue Oct 17 17:27:11 2017 New Revision: 253822 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253822&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [C++ PATCH 82560] missing dtor call https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- Fixed on gcc-7 branch r253822.

[Bug tree-optimization/82585] New: missing -Warray-bounds calling strlen on a member at out-of-bounds offfset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82585 Bug ID: 82585 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds calling strlen on a member at out-of-bounds offfset Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/82546] tree_size handling for TYPE nodes is confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82546 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82550] program using submodules fails to link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82550 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Confirmed from 6.4 up to trunk (8.0). Adding a reference to 'p' in 'foo' clears the problem. module subroutine foo(fun_ptr) procedure(p), pointer

[Bug middle-end/82556] [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4307

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Confirmed on the branch (for the unreduced testcase). GCC 7.2 works. > > Probably Jakubs pattern changes. It is an unusual pattern for LRA. I guess it sho

[Bug libstdc++/82584] div by zero in random distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82584 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- The make_unique bit's irrelevant: std::discrete_distribution X (weights.begin(), weights.end()); is sufficient. Reading 29.6.8.6.1 suggests the code is well formed, but all (two) probabilites are zero

[Bug middle-end/52504] (unreachable) out of bounds access in thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52504 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/38480] bogus warning with -O3 -Wall: "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38480 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus warning when inlining or unrolling: "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 38480, which changed state. Bug 38480 Summary: bogus warning with -O3 -Wall: "array subscript is above array bounds" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38480 What|Removed |Add

[Bug libstdc++/82584] New: div by zero in random distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82584 Bug ID: 82584 Summary: div by zero in random distribution Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/45180] bogus warning: array subscript is above array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45180 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus warning when inlining or unrolling: "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 45180, which changed state. Bug 45180 Summary: bogus warning: array subscript is above array bounds https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45180 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/47418] warning: array subscript is above array bounds at O2 with sin6_addr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus warning when inlining or unrolling: "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 47418, which changed state. Bug 47418 Summary: warning: array subscript is above array bounds at O2 with sin6_addr https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/82583] New: missing -Warray-bounds on out-of-bounds inner indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82583 Bug ID: 82583 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds on out-of-bounds inner indices Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/82582] New: not quite optimal code for -2*x*y - 3*z: could use one less LEA for smaller code without increasing critical path latency for any input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82582 Bug ID: 82582 Summary: not quite optimal code for -2*x*y - 3*z: could use one less LEA for smaller code without increasing critical path latency for any input Product: gcc

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Tue Oct 17 15:52:21 2017 New Revision: 253820 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253820&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [C++ PATCH 82560] missing dtor call https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/

[Bug middle-end/82577] [8 Regression] ICE in compare_base_decls, at alias.c:2053

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82577 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/82577] [8 Regression] ICE in compare_base_decls, at alias.c:2053

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82577 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Tue Oct 17 15:42:19 2017 New Revision: 253819 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253819&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH, middle-end/82577] Fix DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME ICE https://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug tree-optimization/82549] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82549 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/63441] incorrect "array subscript is below/above array bounds" diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63441 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/63477] [6/7/8 Regression] Bogus warning with -O3 -Warray-bounds: array subscript is above array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63477 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/82286] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong array subscript is above array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82286 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/80907] [6/7/8 Regression] False positive: "warning: array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80907 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/82581] New: missing -Warray-bounds on writing past the end of a member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82581 Bug ID: 82581 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds on writing past the end of a member array Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/82549] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82549 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Oct 17 14:53:13 2017 New Revision: 253818 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253818&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82549 * fold-const.c (optimize_bit_fi

[Bug middle-end/82546] tree_size handling for TYPE nodes is confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82546 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Tue Oct 17 14:49:05 2017 New Revision: 253817 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253817&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH PR/82546] tree node size https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017

[Bug tree-optimization/82549] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82549 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Oct 17 14:47:15 2017 New Revision: 253816 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253816&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82549 * fold-const.c (optimize_bit_fi

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug middle-end/80295] [7 Regression] ICE in __builtin_update_setjmp_buf expander

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80295 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/80295] [7/8 Regression] ICE in __builtin_update_setjmp_buf expander

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80295 --- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 17 14:17:17 2017 New Revision: 253815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253815&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog 2017-10-17 Qing Zhao Wilco Dijkst

[Bug middle-end/80295] [7/8 Regression] ICE in __builtin_update_setjmp_buf expander

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80295 --- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 17 14:16:35 2017 New Revision: 253814 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253814&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog 2017-10-17 Qing Zhao Wilco Dijkst

[Bug middle-end/82577] [8 Regression] ICE in compare_base_decls, at alias.c:2053

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82577 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

  1   2   >