[Bug target/80865] broken compilation on Mac OS X 10.5 / powerpc: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80865 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Christian Cornelssen from comment #7) > I have made the time-consuming effort of building and testing gcc-7.2.0 with > varying subsets of the four patchsets proposed with attachment 42124 > [detail

[Bug target/80865] broken compilation on Mac OS X 10.5 / powerpc: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80865 --- Comment #8 from Christian Cornelssen --- Created attachment 42305 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42305&action=edit differences in non-Ada testsuite results when switching from attachment 42124 to attachment 42304

[Bug target/80865] broken compilation on Mac OS X 10.5 / powerpc: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80865 --- Comment #7 from Christian Cornelssen --- I have made the time-consuming effort of building and testing gcc-7.2.0 with varying subsets of the four patchsets proposed with attachment 42124. * Patchset 1/4 copies stack alignment changes previou

[Bug target/80865] broken compilation on Mac OS X 10.5 / powerpc: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80865 --- Comment #6 from Christian Cornelssen --- Created attachment 42304 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42304&action=edit Patchset 2 from patch-darwin-ppc-2017-01-msg02971.diff, sufficient for non-Ada builds to succeed

[Bug target/82408] cross-compiling for arm64 problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82408 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bohning --- Okay, amazingly I have a computer again. I tried what you suggested and it didn't work. I need a libstdc++ library for aarch. Like I said several times, I already have the linaro toolchain, what I want is

[Bug target/82411] const is not always read-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|Powerpc*-*-*|powerpc*-*-* --- Comment #4 from Se

[Bug tree-optimization/82432] Missed constant propagation of return values of non-inlined static functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82432 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Andrew P

[Bug ipa/81323] IPA-VRP doesn't handle return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81323 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/82432] Missed constant propagation of return values of non-inlined static functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82432 --- Comment #1 from Peter Cordes --- Meant to add https://godbolt.org/g/K9CxQ6 before submitting. And to say I wasn't sure tree-optimization was the right component. I did check that -flto didn't do this optimization either. Is it worth openin

[Bug tree-optimization/82432] New: Missed constant propagation of return values of non-inlined static functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82432 Bug ID: 82432 Summary: Missed constant propagation of return values of non-inlined static functions Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: miss

[Bug target/82411] const is not always read-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411 --- Comment #3 from Kees Cook --- To clarify, using -mno-sdata means all things are removed from sdata, not just const, yes? I'd like to be able to leave writable stuff there, to avoid any additional performance penalty.

[Bug c++/80471] (gcc extension) Forwarding-reference `auto` function parameters do not follow the same rules as template functions or generic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80471 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80471] (gcc extension) Forwarding-reference `auto` function parameters do not follow the same rules as template functions or generic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80471 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 21:25:20 2017 New Revision: 253432 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253432&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini PR c++/80471 * g++

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > PS : Do you know we certainly live separated by 3,5 km at Toulouse City ? > I live at 35, rue Edmond Rostand 31200 ... :-) OK, this is a small world. :-)

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > Trace of check ada runtests You can do 'make mail-report.log' after 'make -k check' to have a report. The results are acceptable although gnat.dg/entry_queues.adb and c380004, which probably come from the

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/78131] Inconsistent evaluation for `constexpr` lambdas in templates between `static_assert`, `if constexpr(…)` and `constexpr` variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78131 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78131] Inconsistent evaluation for `constexpr` lambdas in templates between `static_assert`, `if constexpr(…)` and `constexpr` variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78131 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 20:58:52 2017 New Revision: 253431 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253431&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini PR c++/78131 * g++

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 78018, which changed state. Bug 78018 Summary: [C++14] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" with templates and lambdas https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78018 What|Removed

[Bug c++/78018] [C++14] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" with templates and lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78018 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|andipeer at

[Bug c++/78018] [C++14] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" with templates and lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78018 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 20:34:03 2017 New Revision: 253430 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253430&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini PR c++/78018 * g++

[Bug c++/81236] Crash when calling a template member function from generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81236 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80935] [C++1z] incorrect error 'uninitialized variable in constexpr function' when conditionally declaring variable inside lambda inside template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80935 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80767] Eager instantiation of generic lambda body when not required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80767 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/31350] gcc -v --help puts some output on std. out, and some on std. error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31350 Ladislas de Toldi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ladislas at leka dot io --- Comment

[Bug c++/81525] [7 Regression] Invalid codegen with constexpr variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The title is correct, the new failures did show up starting with r253275. I mistyped it in my description and there doesn't appear to be a way to update that, sorry.

[Bug c++/82406] [7 Regression] Rejects a valid snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82406 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82406] [7 Regression] Rejects a valid snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82406 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 17:47:51 2017 New Revision: 253425 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253425&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/82406 - C++17 error with noexcept function type *

[Bug c++/82406] [7 Regression] Rejects a valid snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82406 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 17:47:08 2017 New Revision: 253424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253424&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/82406 - C++17 error with noexcept function type PR

[Bug c++/70029] [8 Regression] ICE with C++11 and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 17:47:08 2017 New Revision: 253424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253424&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/82406 - C++17 error with noexcept function type P

[Bug middle-end/82407] [8 Regression][meta-bug] qsort_chk fallout tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407 Bug 82407 depends on bug 82396, which changed state. Bug 82396 Summary: [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 What

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #7 from Didier G --- Attached, the trace of ada run tests. Please, feel free to inform me about output files to watch. I will do my best to review and report them. Best Regards, Didier. PS : Do you know we certainly live separated b

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #6 from Didier G --- Created attachment 42303 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42303&action=edit Trace of check ada runtests

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 71946, which changed state. Bug 71946 Summary: asm in toplevel lambda function rejected https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/71946] asm in toplevel lambda function rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|paolo.carlin

[Bug c++/71946] asm in toplevel lambda function rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 --- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 17:21:21 2017 New Revision: 253423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253423&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/82369] "optimizes" indexed addressing back into two pointer increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82369 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, with expansion, IVOPTs can find address type uses as: Group 0: Type: ADDRESS Use 0.0: At stmt:_25 = *_6; At pos: *_6 IV struct: Type: const __m128i_u * {ref-al

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 --- Comment #9 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Oct 4 16:40:44 2017 New Revision: 253419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253419&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Revert r253399: PR rtl-optimization/82396 * haifa-sched.c (autopr

[Bug tree-optimization/82429] strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82429 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Strictly, that a program declares stpcpy should be irrelevant if the declaration is outside system headers, because it could declare and define it for some other purpose (even if the protot

[Bug tree-optimization/82405] Function not inlined for switch and suboptimal assembly is generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug ipa/67368] Inlining failed due to no_sanitize_address and always_inline conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368 Loïc Yhuel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||loic.yhuel at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/82405] Function not inlined for switch and suboptimal assembly is generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- Thinking about this some more, this is a not a hoisting problem but a sinking problem. basically we have: int f(void); int h(void); int g(int a) { if (a) return f() + 10; return h() + 10; } Which

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82409] Superflous pxor instructions in the generated assembly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82409 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/82369] "optimizes" indexed addressing back into two pointer increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82369 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Given IR dump before IVOPTs: [15.00%] [count: INV]: _1 = dst_12(D) + bytes_13(D); end_dst_14 = (uintptr_t) _1; srcu_16 = (uintptr_t) src_15(D); dstu_17 = (uintptr_t) dst_12(D); _2 = dst

[Bug c++/82373] syntax error in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82373 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 4 16:15:36 2017 New Revision: 253418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253418&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/82373 * error.c (dump_function_decl): If show_retur

[Bug c++/81525] [7 Regression] Invalid codegen with constexpr variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 15:38:24 2017 New Revision: 253415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253415&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81525 - broken handling of auto in generic lambda.

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #5 from Didier G --- OK. Build succeed. Tests in progress ...

[Bug c++/81525] [7 Regression] Invalid codegen with constexpr variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 15:37:09 2017 New Revision: 253414 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253414&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81525 - broken handling of auto in generic lambda.

[Bug tree-optimization/82429] strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82429 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/82431] [8 Regression] Rejects 416.gamess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82431 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug testsuite/82412] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42334-1.f fails starting with r253342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82412 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oh, and ISL is what comes from contrib/download_prerequisites. isl-0.18 in this case.

[Bug c++/82424] [8 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have typename_type in lookup_base, at cp/search.c:203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82424 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/82412] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42334-1.f fails starting with r253342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82412 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/82431] [8 Regression] Rejects 416.gamess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82431 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug fortran/82431] New: [8 Regression] Rejects 416.gamess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82431 Bug ID: 82431 Summary: [8 Regression] Rejects 416.gamess Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Known to work|

[Bug target/82430] New: [4.9 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Bug ID: 82430 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0" Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug debug/82425] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82425 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82429] New: strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82429 Bug ID: 82429 Summary: strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug tree-optimization/82397] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 in vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82397 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82397 > > --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- > Is it possible to simply invoke data_r

[Bug libgomp/82428] New: Builtins for openacc gang/worker/vector id/size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82428 Bug ID: 82428 Summary: Builtins for openacc gang/worker/vector id/size Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #5 from Andrey Guskov --- Please update the bug header: s/235275/253275/

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov --- Damn. Sorry for the false alarm. The correct revision had to be r253275.

[Bug libstdc++/82427] gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7/8 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #32 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #31) > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > > > prathamesh3492 at gcc d

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Andrey: do you have more details? I don't see how this change, which does not affect the generated code in any way, could possibly cause a SPEC failure.

[Bug libstdc++/82427] gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 mgansser at alice dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from mga

[Bug tree-optimization/82421] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1127

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82421 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/82422] [8 Regression][graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82422 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82414] [5 Regression] Issue with ODR/LTO in G++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82414 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug testsuite/82412] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42334-1.f fails starting with r253342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82412 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/82410] [7/8 Regression] ICE in replace_placeholders_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82410 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/82406] [7 Regression] Rejects a valid snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82406 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/82405] Function not inlined for switch and suboptimal assembly is generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > So it means maybe llvm performs more advance

[Bug tree-optimization/82402] [5/6/7/8 Regression] error: SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI should be set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82402 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority|P3

[Bug c++/82401] [8 Regression] error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 in insert_late_enum_def_bindings on an invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82401 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Version|unknown

[Bug libstdc++/82427] gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/82398] [8 Regression] error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 2 in fill_vec_av_set at gcc/sel-sched.c:3725

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82398 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Version|unknown

[Bug libstdc++/82427] gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7/8 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/82418] Division on a constant is suboptimal because of not using imul instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/82418] Division on a constant is suboptimal because of not using imul instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3) > it's likely that your test measured something else, You are right, my test was bogus and clang's version is faster.

[Bug libgcc/82427] New: gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82427 Bug ID: 82427 Summary: gcc-7.2.1 error: '::mktime' has not been declared using ::mktime; Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/82374] #pragma GCC optimize is not applied to openmp-generated functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82374 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Wed Oct 4 11:13:24 2017 New Revision: 253402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253402&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Adjust test cases for attributes propagation changes for OMP outline

[Bug target/82418] Division on a constant is suboptimal because of not using imul instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82418 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c/82413] [8 Regression] -O0 crash (ICE in decompose, at tree.h:5179)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82413 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug c/82413] [8 Regression] -O0 crash (ICE in decompose, at tree.h:5179)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82413 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Oct 4 10:50:19 2017 New Revision: 253401 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253401&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR82413: Mismatched precisions in build_range_check bui

[Bug tree-optimization/82397] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 in vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82397 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- Is it possible to simply invoke data_ref_compare_tree always, without checking operand_equal_p beforehand? It's possible to canonicalize commutative chains in data_ref_compare_tree, or - even better - whi

[Bug fortran/77296] [F03] Compiler Error with allocatable string and associate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Oct 4 10:43:45 2017 New Revision: 253400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253400&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paul Thomas PR fortran/60458 PR fortran/77296

[Bug fortran/60458] Error message on associate: deferred type parameter and requires either the pointer or allocatable attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60458 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Oct 4 10:43:45 2017 New Revision: 253400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253400&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paul Thomas PR fortran/60458 PR fortran/77296

[Bug tree-optimization/82426] Missed tree-slp-vectorization on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82426 --- Comment #3 from Allan Jensen --- Note it appears the fact it can do it at all in -Os is new in gcc 7

[Bug c++/71946] asm in toplevel lambda function rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/82407] [8 Regression][meta-bug] qsort_chk fallout tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407 Bug 82407 depends on bug 82396, which changed state. Bug 82396 Summary: [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 What

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 --- Comment #7 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Oct 4 10:27:26 2017 New Revision: 253399 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253399&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR82396: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output r253236 broke AArch64

  1   2   >