https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Roberts ---
Thanks Richard, this is now ok, tested on armv7 and aarch64.
However I do see differences in what is selected by march=native on arm between
7.2.0 and 8.0.0.20171001. Is this as expected? Or is it a work i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82388
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
This one also seems to be related, but it fails non-deterministically.
$ gcctk -Os tmp.c; a.out
32767
$ gcctk -Os tmp.c; a.out
0
$ gcctk -Os tmp.c; a.out
32767
$ gcctk -Os tmp.c; a.out
32767
$ gcctk -Os tmp.c
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171001 (experimental) [trunk revision 253330] (GCC)
$
$ gcctk -m32 -O0 small.c; ./a.out; echo $?
0
$ gcc-7.2.0 -m32 -O1 small.c; ./a.out; echo $?
0
$
$ gcctk -m32 -O1 small.c; ./a.out; echo $?
251
-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171001 (experimental) [trunk revision 253330] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82386
Bug ID: 82386
Summary: [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault on 32-bit powerpc BE targets
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71751
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
This works:
type tp(dim)
integer, KIND :: dim = 3
real :: dist(dim)
end type tp
type(tp) :: t(5)
print *, t%dist(2)
print *, t
end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82385
Dakotah Lambert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42271|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82385
--- Comment #1 from Dakotah Lambert ---
Simpler failing test case:
int a,b;
void f(void) {
a &= b;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65389
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62052
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
*** Bug 64429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64429
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79768
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6)
> Eric. Thanks for the BZ maintenance. It's definitely appreciated.
>
> For bugs like this (very sensitive to unrelated code generator changes) it
> is often wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59655
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82383
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82385
Bug ID: 82385
Summary: ICE in extract_constraint_insn, at recog.c:2213
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82247
--- Comment #3 from Joël Lamotte ---
Sorry, I though you would see the flaga in the llink to godbolt I provided:
--std=c++17 -fconcepts -O3
The code I provided in the report do compile, the problem is explained through
the comments that if unco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58908
--- Comment #3 from Maarten de Vries ---
I forgot to mention, I tested that with gcc 7.2.0:
> $ gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.2.0/lto-wrapper
> Target: x86_64-pc-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58908
Maarten de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maarten+gcc at m dot de-vri.es
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82384
Bug ID: 82384
Summary: [8 Regression] s-taprop.adb failed to compile for x32
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to krzysio.kurek from comment #12)
> UBSAN errors regarding integer overflow is by design, and is a part of
> libnoise.
> I can't find any documentation or help on what invalid vptr errors are
> tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82247
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82302
--- Comment #12 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
UBSAN errors regarding integer overflow is by design, and is a part of
libnoise.
I can't find any documentation or help on what invalid vptr errors are though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81351
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82131
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #2)
> I have not been able to create this.
>
> Are you using GNU ld or the gold linker? I've tried both and for me it
> works either way, but it might help to know.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82348
--- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
If the re-generated math.lo.dep file does not refer to internal/cpu.gox, then
something went wrong the first time the file was generated. Try simply
removing your TARGET/libgo directory and building from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82381
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 79768, which changed state.
Bug 79768 Summary: `-Wmaybe-uninitialized' false positive with optimisation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79768
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79768
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81937
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Added Thomas to cc since he is peeking at I/O things I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81499
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Just doing a quick scan here. Has anuone tried allocating the dtv1...4 before
the I/O calls. I think i can see where th einternal runtime is trying to pass
interal pointers to the DTIO procedures and an unal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The ice is because we are not handling the case where the expreesion is type
function vs character expression or character constant. I am thinking we need
to simplify the expression before trying to use it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78497
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82378
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66756
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
*** Bug 82378 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66756
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|2015-11-10 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82383
Bug ID: 82383
Summary: Some new toplevel directories are not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82348
--- Comment #7 from martin ---
I tried to follow your instructions:
1.) remove math.o.dep
> /gcc-compiled/sparc-unknown-linux-gnu/libgo# rm math.lo.dep
2.) run `make math.lo.dep`
> gcc-compiled/sparc-unknown-linux-gnu/libgo# make math.lo.dep
> /
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The reason I sent that bug report is that I had read the manual and
> found that -freal-4-real-16 makes the available real kinds 8, 10, 16.
> The Fortran standard says selected_real_kind(1) must give
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82382
--- Comment #1 from witosx at gmail dot com ---
Sorry, posted wrong g++ -v output
### g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/witos/.local/opt/gcc-git/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/witos/.local/opt/gcc-git/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82382
Bug ID: 82382
Summary: ICE for template auto parameter specialized for
function pointer with variadic arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80666
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Any objection to close this PR as WONTFIX?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Could you please uncomment the line
!print *, "print '", fmt(:fmt_len), "', ", x, " ! => ", str(:len), ": ",
reason
and post the result?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
How long this PR has to rot before being closed as WONTFIX?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80257
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
What is the output at run time of the following test?
Program RunTimeCheck
implicit none
call sub()
contains
subroutine sub()
print *, 'Hello World'
end subroutine sub
end Program RunTim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82375
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|PDT error |PDT components in PDT
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61450
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61450
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Oct 1 09:49:48 2017
New Revision: 253328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253328&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-01 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/61450
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82375
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81376
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82319
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
Dominique identifies r249105 as triggering the issue (but this might well be
exposing a latent).
I have built xc 8.2.1 series tools on Darwin 10 and carried out the following
test with trunk at 253320 (which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49232
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82381
Bug ID: 82381
Summary: internal compiler error: qsort checking failed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45435
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
58 matches
Mail list logo
