https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamrial at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82080
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||darpeer at hotmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82198
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82198
Bug ID: 82198
Summary: clang compile fails with g++ 8
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82197
--- Comment #2 from Shane Peelar ---
Oops, you're right! That didn't even occur to me that the link I was using was
GCC trunk--I assumed it was the latest release. Thanks! We can close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82197
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82197
Bug ID: 82197
Summary: Default flags enabled by GCC at -O3 by default appear
to be out of sync with the GCC documentation
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82196
Bug ID: 82196
Summary: -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues stubs sometimes use wrong MOV
instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Sep 12 21:07:30 2017
New Revision: 252044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-09-12 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Sep 12 21:03:42 2017
New Revision: 252043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252043&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-09-12 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Sep 12 21:02:13 2017
New Revision: 252042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252042&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-09-12 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
Bug ID: 82195
Summary: Undemangleable lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82194
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82194
Bug ID: 82194
Summary: Mapping array section (e.g. [0:N-1]) using omp target
map crashes at runtime
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82136
--- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> And it gets worse because of the splitting
> which isn't exposed to the vectorizer.
Split loads/stores can be a useful shuffling strategy even on Haswell/Skylake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
--- Comment #2 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Any chance to reproduce with a cross compiler on Linux?
I assume that amd64 as a host is implicit in this
request.
It is less clear if the target is intended as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE on |[6/7 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 12 19:45:37 2017
New Revision: 252040
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252040&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-09-12 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/70621
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marc Mutz from comment #2)
> Basically: because the other two compilers compile it.
Again so ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193
--- Comment #2 from Marc Mutz ---
Basically: because the other two compilers compile it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Why do you think this is a bug in GCC?
The "changes meaning of" is a diagnostic which is not required by C++. That is
the C++ language says this is invalid code but a diagnostic is not required.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> emit instead a left shift by -12 and right shift by 19 instead of left shift
> by 31.
Instead of right shift by 31 obviously.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, the shift count is computed in the end in QImode and we have essentially
(unsigned char)(((unsigned char) a) | 0xf7) + 0x28) as the shift count.
The only two results of that, whatever a is, are 0x1f or 0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82137
--- Comment #2 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Interesting idea. It's probably a bit hard to make the vectorizer do this
> though given it's current structure and the fact that it would have to
> cost the ext
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193
Bug ID: 82193
Summary: incorrectly rejects int x; struct { decltype(x) x; } f
= {x};
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 12 18:06:52 2017
New Revision: 252039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82173
PR fortran/82168
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82168
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 12 18:06:52 2017
New Revision: 252039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82173
PR fortran/82168
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton ---
Thank you very much Jakub.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185
--- Comment #5 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Can't reproduce with x86_64-linux-gnu cross compiler:
>
> ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib
> --disable-libsanitizer --prefix=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
> > --- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
> > This is not what is documented:
> >
> > Issue all the warnings demanded by strict ISO C and ISO C+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Sep 12 17:00:00 2017
New Revision: 252038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Steve Ellcey
PR other/81096
* Makefile.am (tte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82116
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #4 from Vsevolod Livinskiy ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3)
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, vsevolod.livinskij at frtk dot ru wrote:
>
> > struct struct_t {
> > unsigned int memb : 13;
> > };
> >
> > extern struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81498
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:33:31 2017
New Revision: 252035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252035&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Steve Ellcey
PR other/81096
* libbacktrace/Mak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42160
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42160&action=edit
gcc8-pr81325.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81498
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:30:28 2017
New Revision: 252034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add -static-pie to GCC driver to create static PIE
This patch adds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:09 2017
New Revision: 252031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70483 make std::string_view fully constexpr
Backport from m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:14 2017
New Revision: 252032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252032&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70483 make std::experimental::string_view fully constexpr
B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:01 2017
New Revision: 252030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Finish implementing P0426R1 "Constexpr for std::char_traits" for C++17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |7.3
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81422
Qing Zhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, vsevolod.livinskij at frtk dot ru wrote:
> struct struct_t {
> unsigned int memb : 13;
> };
>
> extern struct_t b;
> printf("%llu\n", b.memb);
unsigned int :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
>
> --- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #2 from Vsevolod Livinskiy ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does -fsantize=undefined show anything?
>
> I am suspecting you have undefined behavior with respect to the shift.
Test doesn't contain undefined behavior,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80204
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Sep 12 15:29:16 2017
New Revision: 252029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252029&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/80204
* config/darwin-driver.c (darwin_find_versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 12 15:25:15 2017
New Revision: 252028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82112
* config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (altivec_resolv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does -fsantize=undefined show anything?
I am suspecting you have undefined behavior with respect to the shift.
LLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/gcc-dev/bin-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /gcc-dev/trunk/configure --prefix=/gcc-dev/bin-trunk
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170912 (Rev. 252003) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Trying
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
===
--- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 252006)
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy)
@@ -3862,24 +3862,18 @@ g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82114
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82114
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 12 14:32:39 2017
New Revision: 252024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252024&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix GIMPLE FE test (PR testsuite/82114)
2017-09-12 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, causes
Running /tmp/trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr65263.C -std=gnu++98 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr65263.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I see, thanks for clarification. I'm going to send patch for the remaining
bits, hopefully I made it in a right way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82157
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 12 14:15:37 2017
New Revision: 252020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82157
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I don't think this is a dup of 67165, which is about compressed debug sections.
This PR is about debug info in separate files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 14:03:06 2017
New Revision: 252019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79433 no #error for including TS headers with wrong -std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 14:02:59 2017
New Revision: 252018
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79433 no #error for including headers with wrong -std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82132
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> There is no "builtin" for this, the link fail will not go away.
>
Really? You did r207595 yourself, which is the revision that bug 65244 comment
11 said added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 12 13:31:20 2017
New Revision: 252017
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252017&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70483 make std::experimental::string_view fully constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Sep 12 13:27:13 2017
New Revision: 252008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR81285: Fix uninitialised variable in emit_store_flag_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 12 13:21:52 2017
New Revision: 252007
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252007&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/82149
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
>
> Wilco changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Bug 56818 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39304
Bug 39304 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82129
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Not yet analyzed but I see LIM performs store-motion on
[0.00%] [count: INV] [loop 5 header]:
- *h5_26(D) = tv_24(D);
+ h5__lsm.7_18 = tv_24(D);
where I think stores from undefined SSA names could be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thanks Thomas.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191
Bug ID: 82191
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 12 11:49:29 2017
New Revision: 252003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82112
* c-common.c (sync_resolve_size): Instead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Latent issue in gimple-fold.c:
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
===
--- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 252002)
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy)
@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82150
--- Comment #3 from david.welch at netronome dot com ---
The problem exists as well with ldr pc,[something]. I have not dug through gcc
but did some compilation experiments, not nearly enough to be 100% sure, but
for switch statements the code ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82116
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82190
Bug ID: 82190
Summary: Possibly latent miscompilation issue on
ppc64le-linux-gnu for memcpy-bi.c with -fweb
-fno-optimize-strlen
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82189
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82187
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82186
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82188
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
IIRC bitfield rvalues get promoted to 'int' before overload resolution applies
but I may be wrong. enum bitfields may also be a GNU extension.
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
