https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
Bug ID: 82141
Summary: [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE :
rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82140
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82140
Bug ID: 82140
Summary: "internal compiler error: Illegal instruction" on
function exp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
C-Explorer-Build) 8.0.0 20170907 -xc -std=gnu99 -O3 -Wall -msse4 -mno-avx
foo:
pcmpeqd %xmm2, %xmm2
leaq81920(%rdi), %rax
movdqa .LC0(%rip), %xmm3
.L6:
movdqa %xmm3, %xmm1
addq$16, %rdi
movdqu -16(%rdi), %xmm0
paddd %xmm0, %xmm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82138
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
This was fixed in r251843 for rs6000.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82138
Bug ID: 82138
Summary: [8 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: can't
resolve `.got2' {.got2 section} - `.LCF0'
{.text.unlikely section}
Product: gcc
Version: 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82136
--- Comment #1 from Peter Cordes ---
Whoops, the compiler-explorer link had aligned=1. This one produces the asm I
showed in the original report: https://godbolt.org/g/WsZ5S9
See bug 82137 for a much more efficient vectorization strategy gcc sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82137
Bug ID: 82137
Summary: auto-vectorizing shuffles way to much to avoid
duplicate work
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
at
least one shuffle.
with gcc 8.0.0 20170907 -xc -std=gnu11 -O3 -Wall -march=sandybridge
pairs_double:
leaq81920(%rdi), %rax
.L2:
vmovupd (%rdi), %xmm1
vinsertf128 $0x1, 16(%rdi), %ymm1, %ymm1
addq$64, %rdi
vmovupd -32(%rdi), %xmm2
vin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80568
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #16 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82067
--- Comment #7 from jupitercuso4 at gmail dot com ---
$ g++ -std=c++11 -O3 --verbose test.i
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/project/usr-tensilica-RHEL5/stools-8.0-2017-06-05/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.4/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
--- Comment #27 from Daniel Black ---
reduced test case, quite similar however just to be sure:
int a, b;
__attribute__((__cold__)) fn1();
__attribute__((always_inline)) fn2() { fn1(); }
fn3() {
fn2();
if (b)
a = 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81768
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:41:42 2017
New Revision: 251857
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-05 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81768
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:40:06 2017
New Revision: 251856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-05 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82135
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
This PR is a bit messy, please minimize your examples...
Looking at the dse2 dump (before reassoc messes things up):
__intptr_2 = (const long unsigned int) voidp_9(D);
_3 = __intptr_2 + 63;
__aligned_4 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81923
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:29:04 2017
New Revision: 251854
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251854&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81687
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:26:34 2017
New Revision: 251853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-07 Jakub Jelinek
Backported from mainline
2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81621
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:23:14 2017
New Revision: 251851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251851&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-08-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81650
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:20:43 2017
New Revision: 251850
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251850&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-08-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:19:47 2017
New Revision: 251849
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251849&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-08-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45784
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:18:45 2017
New Revision: 251848
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251848&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-07-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82133
Nick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.3.0
--- Comment #1 from Nick ---
I completely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82135
Bug ID: 82135
Summary: Missed constant propagation through possible unsigned
wraparound, with std::align() variable pointer,
constant everything else.
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #3 from Qing Zhao ---
I can repeat this with the latest upstream gcc on aarch64 machine.
the inlining happens when -fno-math-errno is specified.
and it should be only inlined when -fno-trapping-math is specified.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #22 from Steve Ellcey ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #21)
> I think this change caused regressions on armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf
> --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon-fp16 (works OK
> --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16-fp16)
Ranie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82087
d25fe0be@ changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61759
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-unknown-darwin |*-*-darwin
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59447
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57607
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Sep 7 15:53:09 2017
New Revision: 251847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/80897
* config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_emit_se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82134
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57761
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70548
--- Comment #4 from stu mark ---
I left that more for Henrique Andrade.
If there's a problem with the pretty printer, and a lousy hack like this can
keep gdb from hanging, to me, it's worth it.
I don't know which pretty printer was having the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64042
--- Comment #16 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #13)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #11)
> > > Reported upstream here:
> > > https://lists.opendylan.org/pipe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70548
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82134
--- Comment #2 from Zack Weinberg ---
The claim in the Stack Overflow post was that this was useful in a scenario
involving machine-generated code that couldn't return void for some external
reason, but they didn't go into any kind of detail.
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82083
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70548
--- Comment #2 from stu mark ---
this finally got so annoying I did something about it.
This is not the correct fix, but it seems to keep gdb from hanging and as all I
really want to do in life is debug my program, I don't care if it's not
perfe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82127
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #15)
> Yeah, I have a patch that does this. The question is how to query the target
> if the vector sizes share the same register set. Like we wouldn't want to go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82127
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Sep 7 15:33:29 2017
New Revision: 251846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251846&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/82127
* gcc-interface/decl.c (copy_and_substitu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #13)
> I believe r241831 fixed the actual problem that verify_type was catching.
> This still fails because free_lang_data_in_type clears TYPE_LANG_FLAG_4 on
> 't' bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82134
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82107
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Huh, very nice example I must admit.
Following bad happens:
In FooImpl.cpp content of real_payload is inlined to payload function. Then ICF
does merge operation:
FooImpl::real_payload (struct FooImpl * cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82120
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The best would be to add -mbranch-cost= support like many other targets have,
and have an effective target with the list of targets that do support it,
adjust all such testcases to use that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82120
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
Sure, I'm just reluctant to add yet another
check_effective_target_arm_cortex_a5 function in the already extremely long
list of arm-dedicated queries.
Maybe I can play with arm's -mprint-tune-info, which d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On September 7, 2017 1:53:47 PM GMT+02:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
>
>--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>(In reply to Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82120
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #7)
> I think it returns 0 in the testcase (optimizing for speed).
>
> I've noticed that arm_cortex_a5_branch_cost() has the same implementation as
> arm_cortex_m7_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82120
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
I think it returns 0 in the testcase (optimizing for speed).
I've noticed that arm_cortex_a5_branch_cost() has the same implementation as
arm_cortex_m7_branch_cost(), but according to Thomas, the behaviour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82134
Bug ID: 82134
Summary: warn_unused_result triggers on empty structs even when
they are used
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82133
Bug ID: 82133
Summary: unroll-loops too aggressive
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82132
Bug ID: 82132
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-tail-nomask-1.c (test for
excess errors) due to missing posix_memalign
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes, I have backports prepared for 5, 6, and 7. Waiting a short time before
applying those.
Thanks!
Bill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82124
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I think this is a dup, the testcase uses -flto.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 82005 ***
Oh OK, I'm guessing a lot of the other new FAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82131
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82131
Bug ID: 82131
Summary: FAIL: TestCgoCallbackGC in gotools testsuite;
segfaults in morestack.S:529
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81698
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81970
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes. While powerpc{,64}* is primary target and regressions there are relevant
for releases, powerpcspe* is not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> that's not using the unpacking strategy (sum adjacent elements) but still the
> vector shift approach (add upper/lower halves). That's sth that can be
> chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrewjenner at gcc dot
gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82123
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82125
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 7 11:20:40 2017
New Revision: 251843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81979
* output.h (switch_to_other_text_partition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82129
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82129
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82130
Bug ID: 82130
Summary: stringification (#) in traditional mode
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preproces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82127
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82127
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82129
Bug ID: 82129
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at
tree-ssa-pre.c:2447
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
--- Comment #26 from Martin Liška ---
Sorry for the inconvenience, I'll work on that with Honza right after Cauldron
this weekend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953
--- Comment #38 from Martin Liška ---
So downloading the package and testing that with problematic 6.3 does not
reproduce. Can you please verify you have really GCC 6.4? If so, would it be
possible to create a virtual machine or a Docker image wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82067
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Sorry I meant --verbose (not --save-temps) :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Miles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128
Bug ID: 82128
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82127
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
This is the failure on ia64:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
wi::fits_to_tree_p > > (
x=,
type=) at ../../gcc/tree.h:5263
5263wi::fits_to_tree_p (const T &x, const_tree typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82127
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82126
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82126
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Sep 7 09:27:31 2017
New Revision: 251834
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251834&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/82126
* gnat.dg/alignment3.adb: Add pragma No_C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82127
Bug ID: 82127
Summary: [8 regression] gnat.dg/specs/constructor.ads FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80781
--- Comment #9 from René J.V. Bertin ---
redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote on 20170517::08:56:33 re: "[Bug target/80781]
Feature request: build option to use libc++ instead of libstdc++ for increased
usability on Mac"
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82126
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82126
Bug ID: 82126
Summary: [8 regression] gnat.dg/alignment3.adb FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82120
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Doesn't cortex-a5 also force BRANCH_COST of 1? If yes, you should fix up
logical_op_short_circuit tcl function. If not, then I have no idea why that
happens.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82120
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066
--- Comment #19 from Matthias Klose ---
Author: doko
Date: Thu Sep 7 07:17:17 2017
New Revision: 251829
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251829&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-07 Matthias Klose
Backported from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066
--- Comment #18 from Matthias Klose ---
Author: doko
Date: Thu Sep 7 07:15:24 2017
New Revision: 251828
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251828&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-07 Matthias Klose
Backported from mainline
20
95 matches
Mail list logo
