https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81886
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
AFAICT, this is the last version of the patch that was submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01771.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #30 from H. Peter Anvin ---
On August 18, 2017 3:52:12 PM CDT, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
>
>--- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
>(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed on trunk. I'm testing backports to the open release branches and will
commit them after the trunk patch has aged a bit (next week?).
arget: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../../gcc-mainline/configure --prefix=/pkgs/gcc-mainline
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c --disable-multilib
--enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170818 (experimental) [trunk revision 251188] (GCC)
an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46805
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Aug 18 23:56:28 2017
New Revision: 251192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
jit: fix segfault with autovectorization (PR tree-optimization/46805)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81850
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Santos ---
I have a patch that I've tested and will be submitting it shortly (I can't
change the assigned to field yet).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Aug 18 23:41:41 2017
New Revision: 251190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/80210
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
On 08/18/2017 06:13 PM, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
>
> Jeffrey A. Law changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
> --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47413
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 70879, which changed state.
Bug 70879 Summary: Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81898
Bug ID: 81898
Summary: Issue with polymorphic container class
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 18 21:36:50 2017
New Revision: 251189
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251189&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-18 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28)
> > --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
>
> > What are error messages?
>
> None, the warnings are simply missing.
>
> Rainer
Sparc defines STRIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81572
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Aug 18 20:17:26 2017
New Revision: 251188
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251188&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81893
runtime: only use PPC GNU/Linux register co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
> What are error messages?
None, the warnings are simply missing.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #26)
> Several of the new tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC (both 32 and 64-bit):
>
> +FAIL: g++.dg/pr53037-2.C -std=gnu++11 (test for warnings, line 16)
> +FAIL: g++.dg/pr53037-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #26 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Dear Jerry,
Thanks for your confirmation of my feeling about this. I have enough on my
plate as it is!
Cheers
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897
Bug ID: 81897
Summary: spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81896
Bug ID: 81896
Summary: omp target enter data not recognized
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81894
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Thanks. I think https://golang.org/cl/57110 should fix the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg01145.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, it compiles OK on LE.
Note that I saw the errors on both power7 and power8 BE systems and using
different versions of gcc to build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Aug 18 18:12:47 2017
New Revision: 251186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: fix ordering of missing std #include suggestion (PR c++/81514)
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Please can you turn it into a patch that contains both the fix *and* the new
testcase? (e.g. gcc.dg/pragma-diag-8.c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Aug 18 17:46:57 2017
New Revision: 251185
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251185&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81891 fix double-free in hashtable constructor
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50169
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44283
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80529
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52130
--- Comment #3 from Richard Smith ---
The diagnostic in #1 is not only wrong for this case, it's also a rejects-valid
in the case where the underlying types match. I've filed
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81895 for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81895
Bug ID: 81895
Summary: gcc rejects out-of-line definition of enum member of
class template under -pedantic-errors
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80529
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80684
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80567
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81894
Bug ID: 81894
Summary: Typo in x86 built-in function list
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Did you test powerpc64 little endian?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this might be all we need to do to fix it:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/hashtable.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/hashtable.h
@@ -973,17 +973,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81419
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81893
Bug ID: 81893
Summary: [8 regression] compilation error in libgo starting
with r251127
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80763
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #7)
> Still seems to be broken, over a month later.
Still broken, a couple of months even later ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52801
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, error-recovery
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52320
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81892
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52130
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81892
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81892
Bug ID: 81892
Summary: suboptimal code for a if (p) free(p) else free(p)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||80689
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48829
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80689
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80528
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51789
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52130
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51789
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71003
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Note that this currently blocks building Qt with gcc 8. We could work around it
by turning our void* casts to char* casts, but we have a preference for fixing
this problem in the compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50169
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ---
I have sent this to Core for consideration.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
Bug ID: 81891
Summary: heap-use-after-free if inserting element in
std::unordered_map(InputIt, InputIt) throws
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81847
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 42004
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42004&action=edit
A bit smaller test-case
Smaller test-cast which needs to add --param lto-min-partition=1.
Problem is following,
#2 from Benjamin Buch ---
Bug does still exist in:
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20170818 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81890
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81890
Bug ID: 81890
Summary: asm memory constraints are difficult and not well
documented
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877
--- Comment #13 from Alexander Monakov ---
> More rigorously defining the semantic of loop->safelen (the
> middle-end term) is necessary nevertheless. I believe omp ordered
> doesn't have any middle-end representation?
Except on nvptx, 'omp ord
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51545
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51234
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49531
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47256
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Bug ID: 81889
Summary: [7 Regression] bogus warnings with
-Wmaybe-uninitialized -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26748
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49224
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49224
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50456
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81887
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
See also PR81877 for some discussion and an example where SLP vectorization can
break 'ordered'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81888
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877
>
> --- Comment #11 from Alexander Monakov ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81885
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
In fact it's the idiomatic way to get a real pointer from any kind of smart
pointer, e.g. fancy pointers used by allocators (which don't necessarily have a
get member function).
There's even a proposal to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50169
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
EDG rejects it too:
"gr.cc", line 3: error: expected a declaration
new struct A {{ }};
^
"gr.cc", line 3: error: type definition is not allowed
new struct A {{ }};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42000|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Regresses gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f because we no longer DSE
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@
_28 = *weight_94(D);
_29 = _27 * _28;
_30 = _10 + _29;
+ *s_91(D)[_9] = _30;
_173 = _12 + 9;
_174 = _17 + _173;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81888
Bug ID: 81888
Summary: Structured bindings stopped working
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81885
--- Comment #2 from Jörg Richter ---
Okay, I see your point. But I think calling operator->() to get the pointer is
not a very common use-case. Its more like get() is the right function for this
task.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45033
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Clang only rejects it in C++98 or C++11 mode, it accepts it for C++14.
EDG accepts it unconditionally.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81885
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50445
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
