[Bug c/81854] weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/77579] Missed multiple add (int) for CSEd case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77579 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81702] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/80210] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 on ppc64 for with __builtin_pow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/81268] [avr] Support __gcc_isr pseudo-instruction for more efficient ISR prologues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81268 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/81117] Improve buffer overflow checking in strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/45113] absent or confusing diagnostics of invalid template argument list in implicit template class instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45113 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug preprocessor/77810] provide format_inform_at_substring to go with format_warning_at_substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug translation/79998] typo in diagnostic "specified bound %wu"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79998 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug translation/79997] simple-ssa-sprintf i18n: wrong plural form in maybe_warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79997 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/44580] inconsistent "right-hand operand of comma has no effect"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44580 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/44520] improve diagnostic for ambiguous lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44520 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/44400] GCC allows declaring a function having the name of the class using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44400 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/43105] Document restrictions on mixing -fno-rtti and -frtti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43105 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/43454] warning with -Wall despite __attribute__ ((__unused__))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43454 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/38087] Pseudo destructor call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/40897] g++ error on valid syntax (call of templated object method via this pointer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40897 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/36685] clarify/diagnose use of weak constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36685 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/30812] enhancement: exception specification in __PRETTY_FUNCTION__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30812 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51277] Feature request: C++ diagnostic for ambiguous overloads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51277 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/15369] "Wrong" line number for static constructor function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15369 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seongbae.park at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/30257] static initializers are attributed to bogus line number in coverage.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30257 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/81881] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81881 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/81883] bootstrap-lto build fails with undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81883 JD changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64 Host|

[Bug bootstrap/81883] New: bootstrap-lto build fails with undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81883 Bug ID: 81883 Summary: bootstrap-lto build fails with undefined reference to `_Unwind_Resume' Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/81864] building gcc 8 with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats fails on x86-64, arm and aarch64 under gnu linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81864 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/81864] building gcc 8 with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats fails on x86-64, arm and aarch64 under gnu linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81864 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Aug 17 19:56:46 2017 New Revision: 251165 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251165&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix build of --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats (PR bootstrap/81864). 201

[Bug target/81861] [8.0 Regression] ASan pr64820.c testcase segfaults with LTO and -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81861 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Aug 17 19:39:20 2017 New Revision: 251164 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251164&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-08-17 Maxim Ostapenk

[Bug target/81861] [8.0 Regression] ASan pr64820.c testcase segfaults with LTO and -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81861 --- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Aug 17 19:38:20 2017 New Revision: 251163 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251163&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-17 Uros Bizjak Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/80467] Function Without Arguments Fails to Generate Error When Declared Later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80467 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Armstrong --- Any update on this Internal Compiler Error? Has anyone looked into it further?

[Bug target/81861] [8.0 Regression] ASan pr64820.c testcase segfaults with LTO and -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81861 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Aug 17 19:37:06 2017 New Revision: 251162 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251162&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-08-17 Maxim Ostapenk

[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #6 from ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org --- FWIW, the following makes the issue go away (tested on 4.9.4) @@ -6196,7 +6210,9 @@ [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r") (lo_sum:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimme

[Bug target/79242] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242 Andrei Pushkin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||apushkin at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug libstdc++/81835] cxxabi.h has invalid link in comment.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81835 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/26426] Type layout bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26426 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01667.html where I said: I don't think this is a bug. B is the primary base class for Z so has already been allocated (as part of the Y subobject, in I-2b), a

[Bug target/72804] Poor code gen with -mvsx-timode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug fortran/81827] Large compile time with derived-type rrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug c++/26426] Type layout bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26426 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81874] internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:725

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81874 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test-case: int a, c; int d (int f, int g) { return g ?: f; } void h () { int b = a > 0 && 1 > 2147483647 - a, e = b; c = d (++a, e); }

[Bug target/81874] internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:725

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81874 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81803] [7/8 regression] miscompilation at -O1 on mips64el

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > I have just noticed this which seems curious. Is the 39 -> 40 combine really > a valid transformation? It seems we've lost the sign extension and we're > just putting a 32-bit value into a 64-bit register w

[Bug c/81882] attribute ifunc documentation uses invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81882 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c/81882] attribute ifunc documentation uses invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81882 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c/81882] New: attribute ifunc documentation uses invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81882 Bug ID: 81882 Summary: attribute ifunc documentation uses invalid code Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ipa/81877] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect results with lto and -fipa-cp and -fipa-cp-clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov --- I don't understand how LIM may deduce that store sinking is safe without considering may-alias relations. If it is UB to write the same object from different declared-independent iterations, then I think

[Bug target/78804] [RX] -m64bit-doubles does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804 --- Comment #15 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I mean simply to build the compiler on a couple of little-endian systems using fp-bit and make sure that the floating point code works correctly. I don't mean test fp-bit separately, though that's not a

[Bug c++/78919] Lambdas, default parameters and std::function cause assembly error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78919 --- Comment #1 from Jonas Jelten --- Probably the same as bug 59949, if the default value is always created for a template even if the call overwrites the default value.

[Bug c/81859] [8 Regression] valgrind error from warn_about_normalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81859 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/81859] [8 Regression] valgrind error from warn_about_normalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81859 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Aug 17 16:50:06 2017 New Revision: 251157 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251157&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/81859 - [8 Regression] valgrind error from warn_about_normalization

[Bug target/81803] [7/8 regression] miscompilation at -O1 on mips64el

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803 --- Comment #5 from James Cowgill --- I have just noticed this which seems curious. Is the 39 -> 40 combine really a valid transformation? It seems we've lost the sign extension and we're just putting a 32-bit value into a 64-bit register without

[Bug c++/65870] Explicit function instantiation with default valued lambda causes duplicate symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65870 --- Comment #1 from Jonas Jelten --- This is probably the same as bug 59949, and still present in 6.4.0.

bIJbR

ARMwbOY eha92a5z.pdf Description: Binary data

[Bug c++/80227] [5/6/7/8 Regression] SFINAE ambiguity with a pointer to array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80227 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81787] [5/6/7/8 Regression] `#pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-fpermissive"` no longer works since gcc 4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81787 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/71192] Coredump - SIGSEGV exception handling on GCC 4.8.2 in Solaris 11.3, Solaris 11.2 works with same GCC version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71192 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67075] Infinite GC loop with ggc-min-expand=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67075 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/39466] frepo relinking causes error - object in .o but not in .rpo or vice versa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39466 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59949] lambda expression as default argument of function template causes "already defined" messages in assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59949 --- Comment #3 from Jonas Jelten --- This bug is still present in g++ 6.4.0.

[Bug target/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-apple-darwin17.0.0 St

[Bug target/72804] Poor code gen with -mvsx-timode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804 --- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Aug 17 15:56:48 2017 New Revision: 251153 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251153&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/72804 * config/rs6000/vsx.md (*vsx_le_per

[Bug fortran/79072] ICE with class(*) pointer function result and character value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/81873] spurious -Wreturn-type calling a locally declared noreturn function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81873 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug bootstrap/81881] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81881 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- I can't reproduce it now.

[Bug ipa/81877] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect results with lto and -fipa-cp and -fipa-cp-clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877 > > Alexander Monakov changed: > >What|Removed |

[Bug ipa/81877] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect results with lto and -fipa-cp and -fipa-cp-clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug middle-end/81814] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect behaviour at -O0 (conditional operator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81814 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81861] [8.0 Regression] ASan pr64820.c testcase segfaults with LTO and -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81861 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/81869] [8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes,rtl failed to bootstrap on 32-bit hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81869 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- This ==19335==still reachable: 3,185,786,922 bytes in 240,513 blocks probably kills 32-bit hosts.

[Bug bootstrap/81869] [8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes,rtl failed to bootstrap on 32-bit hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81869 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- ==19335== ==19335== HEAP SUMMARY: ==19335== in use at exit: 3,187,351,790 bytes in 240,687 blocks ==19335== total heap usage: 10,232,166 allocs, 9,991,479 frees, 177,590,129,479 bytes allocated ==19335== ==

[Bug ada/79542] [7/8 regression] ICE in add_gnat_descriptive_type_attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542 --- Comment #10 from John Marino --- The original updates by rguenth were lost by the bugzilla-wide data failure, and the rework only fixed the target milestone. I don't have permission to fix the missing data, so I'm going to paste the contents

[Bug middle-end/81814] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Incorrect behaviour at -O0 (conditional operator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81814 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Aug 17 14:33:13 2017 New Revision: 251152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251152&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/81814 * fold-const.c (operand_equal_for_

[Bug bootstrap/81864] building gcc 8 with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats fails on x86-64, arm and aarch64 under gnu linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81864 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Roberts --- aarch64 also ok with gcc-8.0.0 for me.

[Bug c++/81880] thread_local static member template initialisation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81880 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug bootstrap/81881] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81881 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com Target Miles

[Bug ipa/81877] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect results with lto and -fipa-cp and -fipa-cp-clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41998 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41998&action=edit patch for the missed optimization Patch I am testing, fixing the missed optimization (and this testcase as a s

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81702] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug bootstrap/81881] New: [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81881 Bug ID: 81881 Summary: [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on x86 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 17 13:39:58 2017 New Revision: 251150 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251150&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-17 Richard Biener PR ada/81878 * Makefile.

[Bug target/78804] [RX] -m64bit-doubles does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804 --- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #25) > I have no particular concerns with dropping the bitfield code, but clearly it > has to be tested on a couple of little-endian platforms. Can we try to narrow it

[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #5 from Yvan Roux --- Thinking more about it, I think that the right place to fix it is in the define of TARGET_HAVE_MOVT or TARGET_USE_MOVT, but I'm a bit confused with these two macros. My understanding of their semantic, is that i

[Bug target/81879] Bad compilation of small program if LTO is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81879 --- Comment #2 from Frediano Ziglio --- It seems that this do_widen replacement with an invalid pointer goes on and on, looking at differences in the generated executable: -- ---: 00 00 ---: 48 8b 10mov(%rax),%rdx -

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou --- > === > --- Makefile.in (revision 251140) > +++ Makefile.in (working copy) > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ CXX_LFLAGS = \ > # Variables for gnattools, nat

[Bug c++/81880] New: thread_local static member template initialisation fails

pecs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/path/to/gcc/svn/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-svn/configure --prefix=/path/to/gcc/svn --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20170817

[Bug bootstrap/81864] building gcc 8 with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats fails on x86-64, arm and aarch64 under gnu linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81864 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Roberts --- Works for me on x86-64, trying aarch64 now.

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41996 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41996&action=edit patch for the missed optimization Testing this to address the missed optimization(s). This happens to fix th

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Index: Makefile.in === --- Makefile.in (revision 251140) +++ Makefile.in (working copy) @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ CXX_LFLAGS = \ # Variables for gnatt

[Bug bootstrap/81864] building gcc 8 with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats fails on x86-64, arm and aarch64 under gnu linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81864 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 41995 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41995&action=edit Patch candidate

[Bug target/78804] [RX] -m64bit-doubles does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #13 from Ole

[Bug bootstrap/81864] building gcc 8 with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats fails on x86-64, arm and aarch64 under gnu linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81864 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- So started with r249991 where a new static variable of hash_table was added. Well, the implementation of memory statistics is bit fragile as it requires that static construction of mem_alloc_description X happ

[Bug ipa/81877] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect results with lto and -fipa-cp and -fipa-cp-clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/81864] building gcc 8 with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats fails on x86-64, arm and aarch64 under gnu linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81864 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug target/81861] [8.0 Regression] ASan pr64820.c testcase segfaults with LTO and -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81861 --- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Thu Aug 17 11:58:13 2017 New Revision: 251145 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251145&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-17 Maxim Ostapenko PR target/81861

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > As can be seen in the result: > > make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/obj/gcc/ada/tools' > gcc -c -g -O2 -W -Wall -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I../rts -I. > -I/tmp/trunk2/gcc/ada ../rts/s-casuti.adb -o s-casuti.o >

[Bug target/81879] Bad compilation of small program if LTO is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81879 --- Comment #1 from Frediano Ziglio --- This is weird. If after the x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -flto -O2 -g -save-temps -Wall -Werror -Wextra -static -mconsole -o test.exe test.cpp command I run x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -v test.exe.ltrans0.s

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Ah, it works when leaving CC alone and only changing CXX. Somewhat inconsistent I guess. Let me try if bootstrap also still works.

[Bug c++/81879] New: Bad compilation of small program if LTO is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81879 Bug ID: 81879 Summary: Bad compilation of small program if LTO is used Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ipa/81877] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect results with lto and -fipa-cp and -fipa-cp-clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81877 > > --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- > Created attachment 41993 > --> https://gcc

[Bug bootstrap/81864] building gcc 8 with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats fails on x86-64, arm and aarch64 under gnu linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81864 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) > > > I see. I suppose it should use the build tools if not bootstrapping as > > > well > > > (and/or for stage1).

  1   2   >