https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81477
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Jul 19 06:50:34 2017
New Revision: 250336
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250336&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix an UBSAN test-case (PR sanitizer/63361).
2017-07-19 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81464
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Jul 19 06:25:40 2017
New Revision: 250335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle equal-argument loop exit phi in expand_omp_for_static_chunk
2017-07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81480
Bug ID: 81480
Summary: Assertion `ec' failed
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81478
--- Comment #2 from Sean McAllister ---
*** Bug 81479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81479
Sean McAllister changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81478
--- Comment #1 from Sean McAllister ---
Created attachment 41785
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41785&action=edit
cfloat class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81479
Bug ID: 81479
Summary: By default, GCC emits a function call for complex
multiplication
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81478
Bug ID: 81478
Summary: By default, GCC emits a function call for complex
multiplication
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81395
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jul 18 23:39:34 2017
New Revision: 250328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250328&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81395 fix crash when write follows large read
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81451
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81451
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jul 18 23:14:29 2017
New Revision: 250326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250326&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81451
runtime: inline runtime_osinit
We had
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81324
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81324
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jul 18 22:06:31 2017
New Revision: 250324
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250324&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81324
sysinfo.c: ignore ptrace_peeksiginfo_args f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81471
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81471
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 18 21:44:03 2017
New Revision: 250322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250322&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81471
* config/i386/i386.md (rorx_immed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81471
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 18 20:16:47 2017
New Revision: 250319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81471
* config/i386/i386.md (rorx_immedi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68988
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80027
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78654
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55316
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63245
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41992
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67425
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67425
ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81464
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|web
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81471
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 18 18:28:12 2017
New Revision: 250317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81471
* config/i386/i386.md (rorx_immedi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81464
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
Yeah, the
target.insert(target.cbegin(), ranges::begin(concatenated),
ranges::end(concatenated));
appears to cause a bad case of Schlemiel-The-Painter, for each inserted char
the tail of target is mem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Ah:
- 99.79% 0.02% a.out a.out[.] std::vector
>::_M_range_insert
>::_M_range_insert >::insert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81471
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 18 16:10:20 2017
New Revision: 250315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81471
* config/i386/i386.md (rorx_immedi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81281
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Before that rev we had
int a = (int) (unsigned int) ll - (unsigned int) ci) - (unsigned int) i) +
unsigned int) ci - (unsigned int) ll) + (unsigned int) i) - (unsigned int)
ci)) + 2270794745);
and n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
--- Comment #5 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
> Please clarify if the problem is in compilation time (how long the compiler
> takes to compile the file), or in performance of generated code.
Performance of code.
> Please attach preprocessed testca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
--- Comment #4 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 41783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41783&action=edit
intermediate code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81281
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
For clang are you using GCC's libstdc++ or llvm's libc++?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81386
--- Comment #9 from Carl Love ---
Commit 250295 reverts commit 249424 which was causing issues. commit 249424 is
actually a fix for the vec_mule and vec_mulo support that was added in commit
248125. The original commit was using the wrong word
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81477
Bug ID: 81477
Summary: HSA offloading regressions: "function cannot be
cloned"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552
Bug 67552 depends on bug 66960, which changed state.
Bug 66960 Summary: Add interrupt attribute to x86 backend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80653
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh I just applied patch changing warning into missed optimization message, but
yes the issue still exist using -fopt-info-loop-missed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My change @r238585 assumed that "pointer + 2 < pointer" must be folded before
calling to number_of_iterations_lt_to_ne. This is not true when pointer_plus
can overflow. I will look for either fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81469
--- Comment #2 from emi_cuenca at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 41782
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41782&action=edit
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476
Bug ID: 81476
Summary: severe slow-down with range-v3 library compared to
clang
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80653
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81467
--- Comment #3 from alekshs at hotmail dot com ---
Aha, ok thanks for the clarification. It was pretty helpful.
Regarding clobbering, I was compiling on a Skylake Xeon which has
avx512f avx512dq avx512cd avx512bw avx512vl
using -march=native..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81019
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[5/6/7/8 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 18 13:55:47 2017
New Revision: 250312
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250312&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81410
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81463
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Jul 18 13:51:22 2017
New Revision: 250311
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250311&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/81463
* cfgloopmanip.c (scale_loop_profile)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81462
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Jul 18 13:49:30 2017
New Revision: 250310
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250310&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/81462
* predict.c (set_even_probabilities):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46932
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70992
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
We can simply do:
--- a/gcc/fold-const.c
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.c
@@ -9387,6 +9387,11 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
TREE_TYPE (arg0), arg0,
cst0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81069
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jul 18 13:06:07 2017
New Revision: 250308
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250308&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport "Insert diverging jump alap in nvptx_single"
2017-07-18 Tom de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81346
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Created attachment 41781 [details]
> gcc8-pr81346-2.patch
>
> Further optimization from build_range_check.
I wonder if "1" is that special, this optimization ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16251
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to rockeet from comment #3)
> @Martin Liška Yes, my use case is:
>
> __m128i key128 = { key }; // key is an unsigned char
> int idx = _mm_cmpestri(key128, 1,
> *(const __m128i*)(data), // don't r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389
--- Comment #3 from rockeet ---
@Martin Liška Yes, my use case is:
__m128i key128 = { key }; // key is an unsigned char
int idx = _mm_cmpestri(key128, 1,
*(const __m128i*)(data), // don't require memory align
len,
_SIDD_UBYTE_OPS|_SI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389
--- Comment #2 from rockeet ---
I had also tested intel compiler with -O0 serveral years ago, it was OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81408
--- Comment #10 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Jul 18 11:40:38 2017
New Revision: 250304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250304&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81408
* tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (number
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16251
Jens Seidel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jensseidel at users dot sf.net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81302
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[7/8 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
> >
> > Yep, I've noticed. It's strange for me why it's not working. I've just asked
> > at GCC ML: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-07/msg00144.html
>
> It's marked as a tailcall so anything you generate af
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81346
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41781
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41781&action=edit
gcc8-pr81346-2.patch
Further optimization from build_range_check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81346
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41760|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
t.ii:25:19: note: === vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses ===
t.ii:25:19: note: Detected interleaving store _10->x and _10->y
t.ii:25:19: note: Detected interleaving load MEM[(const struct Foo &)_8].x and
MEM[(co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140
--- Comment #9 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> > > Created attachment 41772 [details]
> > > Patch candidate
> > >
> > > I'm going to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81069
--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jul 18 10:18:29 2017
New Revision: 250303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport "Insert diverging jump alap in nvptx_single"
2017-07-18 Tom de V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81474
Bug ID: 81474
Summary: out of memory on constexpr calculation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 18 09:39:53 2017
New Revision: 250302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-18 trunk r250301.
PR target/81
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 18 09:36:21 2017
New Revision: 250301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81473
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_optimize_cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
Bug ID: 81473
Summary: [avr] build fails due to INT8_MIN and friends.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81472
Bug ID: 81472
Summary: gcc.dg/torture/pr52028.c failed on armeb big-endian
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81464
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 41779
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41779&action=edit
Tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81464
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3)
> Tentative patch:
> ...
> diff --git a/gcc/omp-expand.c b/gcc/omp-expand.c
> index 929c530..089bffc 100644
> --- a/gcc/omp-expand.c
> +++ b/gcc/omp-expand.c
> @@ -42
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #20 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
So it's been a year since my last comment. Is this dead or is someone still
working on it? It would be a nice addition to gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81467
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81467
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If you want to clobber the xmm16-31 and/or k registers, do it conditionally
based on preprocessor macros:
__asm ("" : ... : ... : "..."
#if defined(__AVX512F__) && defined(__x86_64__)
, "xmm18"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81471
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81403
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 18 07:35:40 2017
New Revision: 250297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80620
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80620
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 18 07:35:40 2017
New Revision: 250297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80620
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81365
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81225
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81258
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 7.2+ so far.
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo