https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318
Bug ID: 81318
Summary: [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at
profile-count.h:189
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81292
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r249961 PASS for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #6 from Randy MacLeod ---
Created attachment 41682
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41682&action=edit
smaller reproducer with manual work-around
The work-around clearly isn't a viable one.
I believe that builtin_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #5 from Randy MacLeod ---
I agree that the creduce output should be ignored. :(
I ran 'delta' again with a manually cleaned up input and I got a minimal
reproducer that is shorter:
wc -l output:
old:
4756 /tmp/jdcolor-altivec.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81290
--- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha ---
Sorry, my bad. I've messed up my build environment for that target. Indeed
r249924 fixes the ICE everywhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Pierre Chapuis from comment #5)
That's a different bug, the same one as the root cause behind the false
positive in bug 78969, comment 4. The range information available outside the
VRP pass via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-oe-linux
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #3 from Randy MacLeod ---
Created attachment 41681
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41681&action=edit
full preprocessor output when building jdcolor-altivec.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #2 from Randy MacLeod ---
Created attachment 41680
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41680&action=edit
minimal testcase produced by the delta utility
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #1 from Randy MacLeod ---
I also used the delta utility to produce a larger reproducer. I'll attach it as
jdcolor-altivec-testcase-min.i along with the full preprocessor output in case
it's useful to have additional context.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
Bug ID: 81317
Summary: builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Pierre Chapuis from comment #5)
> I think I can reproduce something similar *without* the sanitizer.
>
> Using GCC 7.1.1, with:
>
> #include
> int main () {
> int i; char obuf[3];
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71419
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81300
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 4 21:05:17 2017
New Revision: 249978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81300
* config/i386/i386.md (setcc + mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81294
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 4 21:05:17 2017
New Revision: 249978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81300
* config/i386/i386.md (setcc + mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67352
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81300
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 4 20:52:32 2017
New Revision: 249977
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249977&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-07-04 Uros Bizjak
PR target/81300
* confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81294
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 4 20:46:38 2017
New Revision: 249976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81294
* config/i386/adxintrin.h (_subbor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61551
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70598
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69940
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66398
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35514
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65846
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69513
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Just for interest, this not-very-good code will successfully convert
the uppercase-a-acute input c381 to uppercase-a/combining-acute 41cc81:
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(void)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81316
Bug ID: 81316
Summary: Missing memory side effect on __atomic_store
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
Bug ID: 81315
Summary: powerpc64 vs building lang/gcc7-devel (on FreeBSD
head): xgcc gets segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257
--- Comment #6 from Pierre Chapuis ---
(Note this is my first time reporting something to GCC, if you think I should
have opened a new ticked because it may be a slightly different bug please tell
me.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257
Pierre Chapuis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||catwell-gcc at catwell dot info
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 4 18:51:02 2017
New Revision: 249975
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249975&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/81278
* tree-vrp.c (compare_assert_loc): Turn in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
#3 from David Binderman ---
Did this one get into trunk ?
I am still seeing this at date 20170704.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65891
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66250
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
To answer your last question (from comment 1) first: at expand
time we have:
d.3_10 = d;
_11 = (long long unsigned int) d.3_10;
c.4_12 = c;
e.5_14 = e;
_15 = (long long unsigned int) e.5_14;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|6.0 |
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65430
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65452
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66403
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> > Doesn't it improve performance in 64-bit mode?
>
> It used to be important for CPUs without ESP prediction engines, but most of
> those are
> history now. The codegen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Doesn't it improve performance in 64-bit mode?
It used to be important for CPUs without ESP prediction engines, but most of
those are
history now. The codegen is quite different so it may be the case that i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81314
Bug ID: 81314
Summary: In function `star1(int, std::vector >&) [clone ._omp_cpyfn.1]':
$(PWD)/stencil-vector-taskloop-gccbug2.cc:4: undefined
reference to `std::vector >::vector(std::v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
failure mode? an empty main program is segfaulting.
looks like --enable-default-pie and --enable-secureplt are only used for my
build.
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71556
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> I am planning to look into Zen/generic tunning soon. But why would you like
> to
> enable it for generic? The code size cost is quite large.
>
> Honza
Doesn't it improv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81259
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80451
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am planning to look into Zen/generic tunning soon. But why would you like to
enable it for generic? The code size cost is quite large.
Honza
ret
.size bar, .-bar
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.1.1 20170704"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ /tmp/b.c -S -O2
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mincoming-stack-boundary=3
-maccumulate-outgoing-args
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60510
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312
Bug ID: 81312
Summary: Enable X86_TUNE_ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67321
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #17 from simon at pushface dot org ---
I applied your patches (comment 12, comment 13) to the gcc-8-20170702 snapshot.
Building on darwin 16.6.0 with gcc-7.1.0 as the stage1 compiler was successful
(languages=c,c++,ada).
make check-c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81308
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The ICE is because split2 apparently ends up with various unreachable basic
blocks and the checking code attempts to compute dominance info before those
are actually cleaned up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Further:
$ GNAT_FILE_NAME_CASE_SENSITIVE=1 gnatmake -c p*.ads
gcc -c páck3.ads
páck3.ads:1:10: warning: file name does not match unit name, should be
"páck3.ads"
The reason for this apparently-bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81311
Bug ID: 81311
Summary: An std::ref argument calls copy constructor instead of
template constructor in C++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81304
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bogus warning with |[5/6/7/8 Regression] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
I've had a go at chopping down the command line and got this:
$ pwd
/home/dcb/gcc/working/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc
$ /home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/ -Wall -I.
-I../../../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 41677
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41677&action=edit
assembly with the fixes before r249930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 41676
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41676&action=edit
Assembly with the patch for r249930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Revision r249930 breaks some objc tests:
% /opt/gcc/gcc8p-249834p3/bin/g++
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/forward-1.m
-L/opt/gcc/build_w/x86_64-apple-darwin16.6.0/libobjc/.libs -lobjc -O
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
