https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81260
Bug ID: 81260
Summary: Error "taking address of temporary" is missing
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
See PR 55203.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81133
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81258
Bug ID: 81258
Summary: ICE on C++1z code with invalid decomposition
declaration: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:6760
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81257
Bug ID: 81257
Summary: ICE on invalid C++ template code: in
make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3709
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81256
--- Comment #1 from programmerjake at gmail dot com ---
assuming this is fixed, basic_filebuf::~basic_filebuf will need to add a
try-catch to ignore exceptions thrown there instead of calling terminate
because it's noexcept.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81256
Bug ID: 81256
Summary: basic_filebuf::close doesn't propagate exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Improve -Warray-bounds for |Expected new warning option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250
--- Comment #4 from Jon Grant ---
$ cppcheck --enable=all main.cpp
Checking main.cpp...
[main.cpp:12]: (style) Unused variable: unused_str
[main.cpp:17]: (style) Unused variable: unused_var
(information) Cppcheck cannot find all the include files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172
--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The first one is well defined by C/C++.
[expr.add] para 4:
When an expression that has integral type is added to or subtracted
from a pointer, the result has the ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250
--- Comment #3 from Jon Grant ---
Thank you for your replies. I can see why it is the way it is.
For the moment we can remove unused std::string via code reviews. Maybe it is
something better suited to a static analysis tool.
Jon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80510
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jun 29 22:19:29 2017
New Revision: 249819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-06-29 Michael Meissner
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79799
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jun 29 22:19:29 2017
New Revision: 249819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-06-29 Michael Meissner
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81180
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81180
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 29 21:32:20 2017
New Revision: 249817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81180 - ICE with C++17 deduction of member class template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81188
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81180
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 29 21:13:43 2017
New Revision: 249816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81180 - ICE with C++17 deduction of member class template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Right, we intentionally don't warn for unused variables with non-trivial
destructors, because the destructor could be doing something useful (like
logging that a scope was exited, or committing a "transacti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81253
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
This does sound like freebsd is not building GMP as a target generic enough.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81253
--- Comment #4 from Philipp ---
I use the official FreeBSD port for building GCC 6:
http://www.freshports.org/lang/gcc6
The dependencies are resolved automatically. I did not recompile them with
altered flags (all libraries are build withou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81253
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81245
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81255
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81188
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 29 19:44:58 2017
New Revision: 249814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81188 - matching decltype of member function call.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81188
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 29 19:44:12 2017
New Revision: 249813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81188 - matching decltype of member function call.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77765
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Jun 29 19:07:10 2017
New Revision: 249810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR fortran/77765
gcc/fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81255
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
during GIMPLE pass: vect
umat_single_crystal.f: In function 'umat_single_crystal.constprop':
umat_single_crystal.f:19:6: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
subroutine umat_single_crystal(amat,iel,ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77765
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Jun 29 19:03:43 2017
New Revision: 249809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/77765
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
--- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The fortran ones already have their own bugzilla:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80946
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jun 29 18:57:47 2017
New Revision: 249808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-01-10 James Clarke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78992
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jun 29 18:57:47 2017
New Revision: 249808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-01-10 James Clarke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81255
Bug ID: 81255
Summary: r249704 caused umat_single_crystal.f:19:6: internal
compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81252
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81229
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Reproduced on x86_64-linux native.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jun 29 18:26:45 2017
New Revision: 249807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-01-10 James Clarke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78992
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jun 29 18:26:45 2017
New Revision: 249807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-01-10 James Clarke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81014
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81247
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81247
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Jun 29 18:20:13 2017
New Revision: 249804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81247
* parser.c (cp_parser_namespace_definition)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81180
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81254
Bug ID: 81254
Summary: DWARF debug info for inlined lexical blocks missing
range
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81253
--- Comment #2 from Philipp ---
Adding BOOT_CXXFLAGS doesn't help. The same error occurs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81245
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Actually
>
>if (fold_stmt (...))
> update_stmt (gsi_stmt (new_gsi));
>
> is correct ;) The old update_stmt was redundant (gsi_insert_before updates
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81164
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
--- Comment #43 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Created attachment 41651
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41651&action=edit
Patch to gcc/config/darwin.h
Following up on a comment from Jeff Law on gcc-patches@, I replied as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81164
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 29 16:46:29 2017
New Revision: 249801
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81164 - ICE with invalid inherited constructor.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81253
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
BOOT_CFLAGS and BOOT_CXXFLAGS .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81253
Bug ID: 81253
Summary: Flags -march and -mtune are ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81229
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81229
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at acm dot org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81164
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 29 15:30:11 2017
New Revision: 249797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81164 - ICE with invalid inherited constructor.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81014
--- Comment #3 from SlowRiot ---
On further deep contemplation, the sqrt was a red herring. The minimal
testcase is just:
// Crash: g++-7 -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero -c crash_test.cpp
// internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81241
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||townsend at astro dot wisc.edu
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81014
--- Comment #2 from SlowRiot ---
Alright, this is the moment. I have journeyed deep into the mountains and
meditated long on the problem. I finally managed, after many years of
dedicated effort, to reduce our ~200MB codebase to an isolated exam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81164
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41637|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192
--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries ---
I used dotfn (based on dot-fn in gdbhooks.py):
...
void
dotfn (const char *name)
{
FILE *fp = fopen (name, "w");
if (fp == NULL)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81241
--- Comment #6 from Rich Townsend ---
Jim's patch for pr81195 fixes all the issues we've been experiencing -- so yes,
this counts as a duplicate. Thanks to all for the quick response.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80565
--- Comment #8 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> Why isn't the testcase checked into gcc testsuite?
Sorry, forgot... Thanks for adding.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81162
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81251
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170629 (experimental) [trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79866
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Test which does not fail:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_event_2.f08 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_event_2.f08 2017-06-29
16:16:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79866
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81251
Bug ID: 81251
Summary: check of logical pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81245
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux-gnu |aarch64-linux-gnu
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81133
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #18 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79843
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Jun 29 12:58:32 2017
New Revision: 249783
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249783&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/81194
* cfgexpand.c (expand_gimple_s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80565
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80565
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jun 29 12:53:47 2017
New Revision: 249782
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249782&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR ipa/80565
The testcase in
https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81241
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
AFAICT this seems fixed on trunk (8.0) and gcc-7 by the patch for pr81195.
Duplicate?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81250
Bug ID: 81250
Summary: C++ warnings about unused stl
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81241
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80565
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #4)
> Chengnian, is this resolved?
Why isn't the testcase checked into gcc testsuite?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81247
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81247
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81246
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81248
--- Comment #6 from wilhelm.me...@hs-kl.de ---
Sorry for being this inpatient: do you have a timeline for the fix?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81249
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Started with r249553.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81248
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81058
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81196
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Thu Jun 29 10:41:28 2017
New Revision: 249778
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249778&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/81196
* tree-ssa-loop-niter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81249
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |tree-optimization
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #15 from Marc Mutz ---
FWIW, the patch fixes the ICE for me, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81245
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> Not sure if it's good to introduce copysign here anyway (do we actually
> vectorize this w/o target support?)
We should be able to without target support; I don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81249
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80429
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81249
Bug ID: 81249
Summary: [8 Regression] LTO/PGO bootstrap: ICE: in
compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:1029
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81209
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80479
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to jreiser from comment #14)
> Here's how to retain the increased speed (and save around 300 bytes per
> call) while enabling valgrind happiness.
It won't be as fast. How much slower, only p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70119
--- Comment #6 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: collison
Date: Thu Jun 29 09:21:57 2017
New Revision: 249774
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-29 Kyrylo Tkachov
Michael Collison
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
