[Bug sanitizer/81066] sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc:276:22: error: aggregate ‘sigaltstack handler_stack’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/81066] sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc:276:22: error: aggregate ‘sigaltstack handler_stack’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Another issue with glibc trunk: The definition of __res_state moved from resolv.h to bits/types/res_state.h: /home/markus/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_platform_linux.cc: In function ‘int __tsan::

[Bug sanitizer/81066] sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc:276:22: error: aggregate ‘sigaltstack handler_stack’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This should most likely be filed to sanitizer's upstream bugzilla.

[Bug sanitizer/81066] New: sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc:276:22: error: aggregate ‘sigaltstack handler_stack’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066 Bug ID: 81066 Summary: sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc:276:22: error: aggregate ‘sigaltstack handler_stack’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined Product: gcc

[Bug sanitizer/81065] New: UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution involving different types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81065 Bug ID: 81065 Summary: UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution involving different types Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/81064] New: Inline namespace regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81064 Bug ID: 81064 Summary: Inline namespace regression Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug rtl-optimization/81063] New: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20170611 (experimental) [trunk revision 249105] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk

[Bug fortran/81062] Allocate on assignment with reshape(eoshift(...))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81062 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79939] [nvptx] gcc hangs in nvptx_assemble_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79939 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79939] [nvptx] gcc hangs in nvptx_assemble_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79939 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Sun Jun 11 21:54:00 2017 New Revision: 249106 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249106&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Disable constant pool for nvptx 2017-06-11 Tom de Vries PR tar

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Revision r249105 breaks bootstrap again, even with the patch in comment 4.

[Bug fortran/81062] Allocate on assignment with reshape(eoshift(...))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81062 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79650] [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid c++ code with label arithmetic in convert_nontype_argument (pt.c:6515)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79650 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|error-recovery | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/81062] New: Allocate on assignment with reshape(eoshift(...))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81062 Bug ID: 81062 Summary: Allocate on assignment with reshape(eoshift(...)) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/81061] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE modifying read-only variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81061 Bug ID: 81061 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE modifying read-only variable Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code Sever

[Bug tree-optimization/81053] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81053 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #2) > More accurately, between 249048 and 249053. > > Richard, I can see you've produced three of the revisions > in this band. Would you be able to offer any advice on >

[Bug c++/81060] New: [8 Regression] ICE with un-expanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81060 Bug ID: 81060 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with un-expanded parameter pack Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code Seve

[Bug c++/81059] New: error: assuming cast from overloaded function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81059 Bug ID: 81059 Summary: error: assuming cast from overloaded function Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/80897] [8 regression] gnat bootstrap broken on SPARC64/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- It's another instance of PR middle-end/44993 but the cause is different. maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr turns: MEM[symbol: MEM[(void *)&stream_op_tss_names + 4294967296B], index: _30, offset: 0B] into: M

[Bug tree-optimization/81053] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81053 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de --- Comment #

[Bug testsuite/81058] New: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpmovu?swb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovu?swb.*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81058 Bug ID: 81058 Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpmovu?swb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovu?swb.* Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c++/81057] New: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with broken default template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81057 Bug ID: 81057 Summary: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with broken default template parameter Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/81056] New: [7,8 Regression] FAIL: 17_intro/names.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81056 Bug ID: 81056 Summary: [7,8 Regression] FAIL: 17_intro/names.cc (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81055] New: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer for array new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81055 Bug ID: 81055 Summary: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer for array new Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery, i

[Bug fortran/81027] Assumed-shape array reported as deferred.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81027 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/81054] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE with volatile variable in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81054 Bug ID: 81054 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with volatile variable in constexpr function Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery,

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 --- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAICT the patch fixes all the issues of this PR and its duplicates (I have found two more). It also compiles the tests in pr55763, but gives a wrong output 0. 1.1002 0.2000

[Bug fortran/57019] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Compiler crashes (and make wrong assignments) at some combinations of pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57019 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The original test compiles with the patch for pr34640. However the test in comment 4 still segfault.

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Bader at lrz dot de --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/57116] [OOP] ICE for pointer assignment inside SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57116 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov

[Bug tree-optimization/81053] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81053 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Problem seems to occur between gcc revisions 249048 and 249069.

[Bug fortran/52473] CSHIFT slow - inline it?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Also see the discussion at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/AI0F1Vpkc3I There is one thing that I do not understand. For the following test code, which compares straightforward DO

[Bug tree-optimization/81041] [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr78582.c fails with ICE starting with r249058

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81041 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc*-*-*| Status|UNCONFIRMED