https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170527 (experimental) [trunk revision 248540] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O3
=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170527 (experimental) [trunk revision 248540] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O3 small.c ; ./a.out
0
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -Os small.c ; ./a.out
3
$ cat small.c
int printf(const char *, ...);
struct S0 {
int f0 : 24;
int f1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899
Bug ID: 80899
Summary: Devirtualization causes incorrect code generation with
placement new in some cases
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41420|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80865
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
please could you apply the patches attached to :
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-01/msg02971.html
I suspect that you're reporting a pre-existing condition.
now we're back in stage #1 - we could po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897
Bug ID: 80897
Summary: [8.0] [sparc64] GNAT BUG , 20170520 (experimental)
[trunk 248308]
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80896
Bug ID: 80896
Summary: [[nodiscard]] is ignored for functions returning
references
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
I built the latest version of hmmer from upstream on x86_64-linux and make
check succeeded. I did it again with -O2 -ffast-math -funsigned-char in CFLAGS,
and got a single failure in sse-utest both with my patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Is there a way I can reproduce that? I don't think I have access to SPEC. Would
using a regular upstream hmmer work? Is that just running make test? Or do you
have before/after dumps?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80887
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat May 27 07:46:12 2017
New Revision: 248533
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248533&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/80887
2017-05-25 Marc Glisse
* ma
11 matches
Mail list logo