https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477
--- Comment #10 from Stefano Zaghi ---
Dear all,
here https://github.com/szaghi/leaks_hunter you can find my report. Into the
report I shown all the test I have done, I provide the sources and the scripts
I used to generate them.
As FortranFan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80502
Bug ID: 80502
Summary: Provide macro to indicate OpenMP SIMD support
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501
Bug ID: 80501
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code w/ a signed char, a
shift, and a conversion to int
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80500
Bug ID: 80500
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE: internal consistency failure
(error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
de. The 64-bit mode works fine.
$ gcc-trunk --version
gcc-trunk (GCC) 8.0.0 20170423 (experimental) [trunk revision 247083]
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498
Bug ID: 80498
Summary: Simple program with address sanitizer and regex hangs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #18 from Pedro Alves ---
I sent a patch using the __builtin_constant_p idea:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00983.html
-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170423 (experimental) [trunk revision 247083] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O1 abc.c
abc.c: In function ‘fn1’:
abc.c:5:6: internal compiler error: in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:7346
void fn1() {
^~~
0xe336c7 tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2
--- Comment #70 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71729
Zaak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Zaa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk, will backport to 7 as soon as permitted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 23 15:49:16 2017
New Revision: 247084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/80484
* io.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80496
Bug ID: 80496
Summary: missing diagnostic regarding noreturn mismatch in
function pointer initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80495
Bug ID: 80495
Summary: attribute [[noreturn]] is accepted in function pointer
declarations
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #12 from janus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.vandelst at noaa dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800
Bug 68800 depends on bug 63473, which changed state.
Bug 63473 Summary: Memory leak with ALLOCATABLE, INTENT(OUT) dummy arguments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63473
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63473
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8.0 regression] ICE on |[8.0 regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494
Bug ID: 80494
Summary: [8.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80493
Bug ID: 80493
Summary: std::experimental::optional::swap is ill formed
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Apr 23 08:26:50 2017
New Revision: 247083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-22 Janus Weil
PR fortran/80121
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong code when unrolling a |[5/6 Regression] Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70799
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Apr 23 07:25:30 2017
New Revision: 247082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70799
* config/i386/i386.c (dimode_scala
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
FYI, if the code is not executed in a loop but instead
void do_syscalls_noloop (void)
{
syscall_7 (0, 8);
syscall_7 (1, 9);
syscall_7 (0, 8);
syscall_7 (1, 9);
}
then the generated code i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 41249
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41249&action=edit
loopasm.s: Generated assembly
Assembler output as generated with
$ avr-gcc loopasm.c -O2 -dp -S -std=gnu99
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80469
Ubikovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #7 from Ubikovich ---
OK
30 matches
Mail list logo
