[Bug c++/70413] Class template names in anonymous namespaces are not globally unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70413 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- This gets wrongly set here: decl2.c: 2912 else if (DECL_TEMPLOID_INSTANTIATION (decl)) 2913 { 2

[Bug c++/69953] [5/6/7 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #19) > > _ZTCN3Gtk14TreeViewColumnE0_N4Glib6ObjectE/10 > > (_ZTCN3Gtk14TreeViewColumnE0_N4Glib6ObjectE) @0x76816980 > > Aha, this is an construction vtable and the

[Bug rtl-optimization/70703] [6 regression] Regression in register usage on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70703 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 regression] Regression |[6 regression] Regression

[Bug target/80327] _mm512_abs_ps intrinsic missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80327 --- Comment #1 from Sven Woop --- This intrinsic is documented here: https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=_mm512_abs_ps&techs=AVX_512&expand=41 This is supported by latest ICC and Clang.

[Bug target/80326] _mm512_trunc_ps intrinsic missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80326 --- Comment #1 from Sven Woop --- Ok that one is in the SVML and only supported by ICC, not by Clang: https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#techs=SVML&text=_mm512_trunc_ps There seem to be no SVML for GCC, thus please cl

[Bug target/80325] _mm512_undefined intrinsic missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80325 --- Comment #2 from Sven Woop --- For AVX512 the Intel Intrinsics guide also mentioned the _mm512_undefined as alias for _mm512_undefined_ps. https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=_mm512_undefined&techs=AVX_512 ICC

[Bug target/80324] _mm512_reduce_xxx type instrinsics are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80324 --- Comment #1 from Sven Woop --- These intrinsics are supported by latest ICC and Clang. Documentation of these can be found here: https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=reduce&techs=AVX_512 Likely many other reduc

[Bug target/80323] _mm512_int2mask and _mm512_mask2int intrinsics are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80323 --- Comment #1 from Sven Woop --- Documentation of these can be found here: https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=_mm512_int2mask These are supported by the latest ICC and Clang.

[Bug tree-optimization/80304] [7 Regression] Wrong result with do concurrent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80304 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P3 Component|fortran

[Bug c++/71174] [concepts] Segmentation fault while processing concepts error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71174 wmx16835 at 126 dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wmx16835 at 126 dot com --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/80335] New: perf of copying std::optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80335 Bug ID: 80335 Summary: perf of copying std::optional Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priorit

[Bug c++/80334] New: Segfault when taking address of copy of unaligned struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80334 Bug ID: 80334 Summary: Segfault when taking address of copy of unaligned struct Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug fortran/80304] [7 Regression] Wrong result with do concurrent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80304 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/70478] [LRA] S/390: Performance regression - superfluous stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70478 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #6) > The only solution we found caused other regressions. I'll try to change the sensitive LRA code to solve it. It will need to test a few targets. So, if eve

[Bug c++/70413] Class template names in anonymous namespaces are not globally unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70413 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80304] [7 Regression] Wrong result with do concurrent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80304 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #14 fro

[Bug c++/70413] Class template names in anonymous namespaces are not globally unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70413 ethortsen at itg dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ethortsen at itg dot com --- C

[Bug c++/80309] [7 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types _Args2 and _Args2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80309 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80309] [7 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types _Args2 and _Args2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80309 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 5 19:10:17 2017 New Revision: 246717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246717&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/80309 * pt.c (canonical_type_parameter): Use vec_sa

[Bug c++/80244] [6/7 Regression] ICE with attribute in template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80244 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/80178] Class with deleted copy and move constructors uses wrong argument passing ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80178 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 41138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41138&action=edit fix Here's a fix. I'm nervous about applying it at this point in GCC 7, though.

[Bug c++/80332] Warning is issued for deprecated "using" type alias of deprecated type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80332 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/78104] optimizer doesn't grok C++ new/delete yet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/80331] unused const std::string not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80331 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78104] optimizer doesn't grok C++ new/delete yet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comme

[Bug fortran/80333] New: Namelist dtio write of array of class does not traverse the array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80333 Bug ID: 80333 Summary: Namelist dtio write of array of class does not traverse the array Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/80331] unused const std::string not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80331 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||23383 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/80318] GCC takes too much RAM and time compiling a template file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80318 --- Comment #2 from benjamin.redelings at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 41137 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41137&action=edit preprocessed source

[Bug libstdc++/80331] unused const std::string not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80331 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) > I didn't check if those are the only blockers in this case... Looks like they are indeed the only blockers, since we optimize the below just fine. So, known issue (w

[Bug c++/80332] New: Warning is issued for deprecated "using" type alias of deprecated type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80332 Bug ID: 80332 Summary: Warning is issued for deprecated "using" type alias of deprecated type Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/80331] unused const std::string not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80331 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- If you replace "a" with something longer (size>16 when counting the last '\0'), it does reproduce. I'd say this is a dup of 2 known issues: - the compiled part of libstdc++ prevents optimization (maybe eventual

[Bug middle-end/79788] ICE in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:9557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79788 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even gcc 3.2 ICEs on this.

[Bug middle-end/79788] ICE in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:9557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79788 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug libstdc++/80331] unused const std::string not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80331 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/80331] New: unused const std::string not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80331 Bug ID: 80331 Summary: unused const std::string not optimized away Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc

[Bug middle-end/77486] ubsan detects runtime error: left shift of negative value -3 at real_hash in real.c:2890

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77486 --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Even r246252 is more than 2 weeks old. Why not latest trunk? Because I have no time to download and check every trunk.

[Bug middle-end/77486] ubsan detects runtime error: left shift of negative value -3 at real_hash in real.c:2890

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77486 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77486] ubsan detects runtime error: left shift of negative value -3 at real_hash in real.c:2890

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77486 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even r246252 is more than 2 weeks old. Why not latest trunk?

[Bug fortran/80330] New: OpenACC: Unexpected data mapping instead of implicit firstprivate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80330 Bug ID: 80330 Summary: OpenACC: Unexpected data mapping instead of implicit firstprivate Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc

[Bug middle-end/77486] ubsan detects runtime error: left shift of negative value -3 at real_hash in real.c:2890

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77486 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- This is on trunk level 239276. Going to check on newer level 246252.

[Bug tree-optimization/80318] GCC takes too much RAM and time compiling a template file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80318 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/70703] [6/7 regression] Regression in register usage on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70703 --- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Apr 5 16:14:28 2017 New Revision: 246711 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246711&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-04-05 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/70703

[Bug middle-end/77486] ubsan detects runtime error: left shift of negative value -3 at real_hash in real.c:2890

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77486 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/80329] New: Poor location for array bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80329 Bug ID: 80329 Summary: Poor location for array bounds warning Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/77486] ubsan detects runtime error: left shift of negative value -3 at real_hash in real.c:2890

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77486 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- Still in trunk /home/vitti/1tb/vitti/test/gcc-trunk-239276/gcc/real.c:2889:25: runtime error: left shift of negative value -3

[Bug c++/80328] New: With -ffloat-store std::array operator[] no longer cost-free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80328 Bug ID: 80328 Summary: With -ffloat-store std::array operator[] no longer cost-free Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/80298] incompatible with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80298 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Apr 5 15:33:49 2017 New Revision: 246708 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246708&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/80298 * config/i386/mmintrin.h: Add -mss

[Bug rtl-optimization/70703] [6/7 regression] Regression in register usage on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70703 --- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Apr 5 15:07:51 2017 New Revision: 246707 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246707&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-04-05 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/70703

[Bug sanitizer/79265] [7 regression] -fsanitize=undefined inserts unnecessary null pointer tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265 --- Comment #6 from Franz Sirl --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > This is a new warning, the fact that we didn't warn on some code and now > warn with a new warning is not necessarily a regression. Well, I wasn't so sure either if

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] [5/6 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can be reproduced on x86_64-linux with -O2 -mfma -ffast-math. Comparing pre and post r246674 differences, the first one I see in forwprop3: @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ foo (unsigned int x, unsigned int y, unsigned int

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] [5/6 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- I've seen it fail on powerpc64-linux too.

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] [5/6 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 --- Comment #14 from Dominik Vogt --- Created attachment 41135 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41135&action=edit dumpfile

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] [5/6 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/79265] [7 regression] -fsanitize=undefined inserts unnecessary null pointer tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug middle-end/79788] ICE in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:9557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79788 Alexander Ivchenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aivchenk at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug sanitizer/79265] [7 regression] -fsanitize=undefined inserts unnecessary null pointer tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is a new warning, the fact that we didn't warn on some code and now warn with a new warning is not necessarily a regression.

[Bug sanitizer/79265] [7 regression] -fsanitize=undefined inserts unnecessary null pointer tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265 Franz Sirl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/80308] [7 Regression] asan crash on big-endian powerpc-linux target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80308 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/80308] [7 Regression] asan crash on big-endian powerpc-linux target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80308 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 5 13:17:15 2017 New Revision: 246703 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246703&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80308 * asan.c (asan_store_shadow_bytes): Fi

[Bug c++/80322] convert intrinsics missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80322 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#expand=371,370,1707,1708&text=_mm512_cvtsd_f64

[Bug c++/80325] _mm512_undefined intrinsic missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80325 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/80322] convert intrinsics missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80322 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/80322] convert intrinsics missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80322 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/80322] convert intrinsics missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80322 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/80262] address space gets lost in memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80262 --- Comment #6 from Stefan M Freudenberger --- Created attachment 41134 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41134&action=edit Modified source program that shows issue on x86_64. I've modified my example (attached) to show the is

[Bug c++/80327] New: _mm512_abs_ps intrinsic missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80327 Bug ID: 80327 Summary: _mm512_abs_ps intrinsic missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug c++/80326] New: _mm512_trunc_ps intrinsic missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80326 Bug ID: 80326 Summary: _mm512_trunc_ps intrinsic missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/80325] New: _mm512_undefined intrinsic missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80325 Bug ID: 80325 Summary: _mm512_undefined intrinsic missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/80324] New: _mm512_reduce_xxx type instrinsics are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80324 Bug ID: 80324 Summary: _mm512_reduce_xxx type instrinsics are missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/80309] [7 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types _Args2 and _Args2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80309 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/80323] New: _mm512_int2mask and _mm512_mask2int intrinsics are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80323 Bug ID: 80323 Summary: _mm512_int2mask and _mm512_mask2int intrinsics are missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/80322] New: convert intrinsics missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80322 Bug ID: 80322 Summary: convert intrinsics missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assign

[Bug target/78002] gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78002 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Apr 5 11:48:02 2017 New Revision: 246702 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246702&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/78002 * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_e

[Bug sanitizer/80308] [7 Regression] asan crash on big-endian powerpc-linux target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80308 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/80294] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with constexpr and inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- It can be context-specific, NULL elts valid only in some CONSTRUCTORs, e.g. during constexpr processing or whatever. In any case it would be good to understand if it is intentional and what it means.

[Bug c++/80294] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with constexpr and inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294 --- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- I only looked at a small random sample. So yes, you are right and I retract my patch, because the majority doesn't expect a NULL elt.

[Bug c++/80294] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with constexpr and inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- I don't know what it means to have NULL elt and it looks weird to me, but I'm not a C++ FE maintainer, I assume Jason and/or Nathan will review your patch and know what it means. Just grepping through FOR_EA

[Bug c++/80294] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with constexpr and inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294 --- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > r234636 just moved that, the constructor_elt ce = { index, NULL_TREE }; > being pushed had there been before Nathan's patch too. But checking for valid e

[Bug c++/80294] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with constexpr and inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80294 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- r234636 just moved that, the constructor_elt ce = { index, NULL_TREE }; being pushed had there been before Nathan's patch too.

[Bug fortran/80304] [7 Regression] Wrong result with do concurrent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80304 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Can you narrow it down further? Not trivial!-(

[Bug fortran/80305] [7 Regression] print statement inside do-concurrent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80305 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/69498] ICE on disjunct cases with displaced or incomplete embedded statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69498 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/80320] Constructor executed twice for the same static member when using -fno-implicit-templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80320 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/80307] [7 regression] MUL generated for small multiplier cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80307 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/80321] New: [7 regression] infinite recursion with inlining of nested function and debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80321 Bug ID: 80321 Summary: [7 regression] infinite recursion with inlining of nested function and debug info Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [6/7 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/79890] ICE in s390_initial_elimination_offset, at config/s390/s390.c:10430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79890] ICE in s390_initial_elimination_offset, at config/s390/s390.c:10430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79890 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Wed Apr 5 08:28:18 2017 New Revision: 246701 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246701&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/79890: S/390: Fix crash. builtin_eh_return requires the ret

[Bug sanitizer/80308] [7 Regression] asan crash on big-endian powerpc-linux target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80308 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/80308] [7 Regression] asan crash on big-endian powerpc-linux target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80308 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #11) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > > Created attachment 41131 [details] > > gcc7-pr80308.patch > > > > Full patch (untested so far). > > Thanks!

[Bug c++/80309] [7 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types _Args2 and _Args2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80309 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=3000 triggers the ICE, --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=2000 doesn't.