https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or of course aarch64 could replace not just futex.h, but wait.h if it has
something smarter. This needs to be done by somebody who knows the ISA though
(i.e. not me).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79777
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 2 07:53:42 2017
New Revision: 245830
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245830&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-02 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79777
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Wfe kinda works. But yield might be better. Though one most implementions
yield is just a nop. Even on the (4thread/core) hyperthread CN99xx, it is a
nop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79789
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[6 Regression] non-reserved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krisk0.2017.02.27@protonmai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79743
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79514
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> Maybe we should use our own pushxf expander?
No. Middle end should be fixed. x86 does not define any of HAVE_PRE_MODIFY
macros.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Comment #7 from Chen Baozi ---
Created attachment 40867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40867&action=edit
synchronization test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
BTW, aarch64 doesn't override cpu_relax, does the HW have any instruction
similar to __builtin_ia32_pause () that could be used for spinning?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Or the case the futex syscall is returning right away ...
The spinning is completely configurable, see the documented OMP_WAIT_POLICY
(standard) and GOMP_SPINCOU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79514
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
We go through:
if (STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD)
/* ??? This seems wrong if STACK_PUSH_CODE == POST_DEC. */
dest_addr = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79792
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
--program-prefix= and --program-suffix= are never passed into the gcc subdir,
but are transformed to a --program-transform-name.
the toplevel (expanded from an autoconf macro) has:
# The aliases save the n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Or the case the futex syscall is returning right away ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder if the case we are spinning too much in user space before hitting the
futex syscall.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase for likely the same bug, at least hang starts at r221983.
-fPIC -O2 -m32 -march=i686 -fno-omit-frame-pointer rh1406093.i
long long *a, *b, c;
int d, e;
int baz (void);
static inline long long
foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79514
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I should note I have seen some scalability issues with GOMP compared to LLVM's
openmp implementation on ThunderX 2 CN99xx (and on ThunderX 1 CN88xx). I don't
know if this is related to this or not because I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79514
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #0)
> (insn 10 9 11 2 (set (mem:XF (pre_modify:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
> (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
> (const_int -16 [0xfff0]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79789
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Mar 2 03:43:49 2017
New Revision: 245828
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245828&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79789 fix non-reserved names in headers
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Mar 2 03:43:36 2017
New Revision: 245827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 79798 Fix incorrect use of std::result_of in std::bind
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79713
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
What are you talking about? \f is not "missing" and works as it should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79741
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jim Michaels from comment #0)
> strange. a compiler should not cache the source code.
It doesn't.
> all these bugs I have
> fixed with static casts and the same errors are still reported.
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79741
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As usual, I'm fairly sure you're mistaken. Without a testcase showing a problem
we can't help you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79714
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79789
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And this fails since 5.1.0 with C++11 or later:
#define e 1
#include
And this fails for all versions at least as far back as 4.3 (although it's only
valid in C++98 and C++03 because C++11 adds member fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79767
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from Nat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79774
--- Comment #3 from xuliqun ---
by the way, when compile,used gcc for arm64,not x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79801
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79801
Bug ID: 79801
Summary: Disable ira.c:add_store_equivs for some targets?
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79774
--- Comment #2 from xuliqun ---
Makefile like this :
NATIVE_CAMERA_LOCAL_PATH:= $(call my-dir)
include $(CLEAR_VARS)
LOCAL_MULTILIB := first
LOCAL_PATH := $(NATIVE_CAMERA_LOCAL_PATH)
LOCAL_SRC_FILES := \
CameraManagerImpl.cpp \
CameraP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79789
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|6.3.0 |5.4.0
Summary|[7 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79766
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from Nat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79800
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79800
Bug ID: 79800
Summary: wrong snprintf result range with precision in a narrow
negative-positive range
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79799
Bug ID: 79799
Summary: Improve vec_insert of float on Power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79699
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We need to add && to the arg types in the result_of argument, so that top-level
cv qualifiers aren't lost in the function type that result_of requires us to
use:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116
--- Comment #14 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to amker from comment #13)
> We should create another PR for additional copy instructions after my patch
> and close this one. IMHO they are two different issues.
Yes, I agree. Yuri, can you take ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
Bug ID: 79798
Summary: [7 Regression] std::bind uses wrong value category
with result_of
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79692
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Mar 1 23:39:59 2017
New Revision: 245822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245822&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79692 - [7 Regression] -Wformat-overflow false positive
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79692
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79783
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79699
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79797
Bug ID: 79797
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI, this pointer and
constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79796
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79796
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79796
Bug ID: 79796
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and this pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79794
--- Comment #1 from Jim Wilson ---
Patch posted here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00058.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79795
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79795
Bug ID: 79795
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] Fortran ICE in resolve_symbol
starting with r163221
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79794
Bug ID: 79794
Summary: unnecessary copy from target to target results in poor
code for aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79105
PeteVine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
Bug ID: 79793
Summary: Incorrect stack alignment for interrupt handler in
64-bit
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
--- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Wed Mar 1 21:18:18 2017
New Revision: 245819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79544
* rs6000/rs6000-c.c (struct altivec_builti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
--- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Wed Mar 1 21:17:46 2017
New Revision: 245818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245818&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79544
* rs6000/rs6000-c.c (struct altivec_builti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79792
Bug ID: 79792
Summary: configuring a nvptx-none build with
--program-suffix=-7 results in a misnamed installed
binary
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79791
Bug ID: 79791
Summary: -Werror=write-strings ignored with -Wpedantic
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790
--- Comment #3 from Jochen Görtler ---
This is the error:
template_class_deduction.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
template_class_deduction.cpp:4:29: error: class template argument deduction
failed:
std::array test = {1,2,3};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790
--- Comment #2 from Jochen Görtler ---
The bug can also be reproduced in the compiler explorer:
https://godbolt.org/g/3NBvoL
-bug/configure --prefix=/home/jochen/Developer/gcc-bug
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.1 20170301 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79780
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790
Bug ID: 79790
Summary: [C++17] ICE class template argument deduction failed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752
--- Comment #3 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: acsawdey
Date: Wed Mar 1 19:58:05 2017
New Revision: 245817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-01 Aaron Sawdey
PR target/79752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79789
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79789
Bug ID: 79789
Summary: [7 Regression] non-reserved names in
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79773
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Ah, I grepped wrongly. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79772
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I wrote a simple Python script (read fuzzer) which reads GCC's options via
--help=x and randomly selects set of options which are use to compile a random
test-case in LLVM and GCC test-suite. If you are intere
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79756
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> but note that convert_vector_to_array_for_subscript will return
> VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR (MAYBE_CONST (...)) then. Maybe proper
> operati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79439
--- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Mar 1 18:33:21 2017
New Revision: 245813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-03-01 Michael Meissner
PR target/79439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 40864
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40864&action=edit
A small self-contained testcase
I have finally managed to put together a small self-contained
testcase. Compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79780
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79788
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79787
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79786
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79785
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Summary|ICE in gimplify_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79785
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79788
Bug ID: 79788
Summary: ICE in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:9557
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79787
Bug ID: 79787
Summary: ICE in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:469
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79786
Bug ID: 79786
Summary: ICE tree check: expected class 'type', have
'declaration' (var_decl) in iamcu_alignment, at
config/i386/i386.c:30263
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79785
Bug ID: 79785
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11950
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79780
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79672
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
inchash::add_expr can't handle TREE_VECs so it seems the fix is to teach it to
deal with it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59075
--- Comment #9 from manuelrciosici at gmail dot com ---
Just to be sure this ticket doesn't get considered out of date, I want to
confirm that this is still an issue on OS X 10.12.3 using GCC 6.3 (compiled
from Homebrew) and GDB 7.12.1 (compiled f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #27)
> Well, the valgrind output actually exactly that the comparison is optimized
> away.
> I actually would have to regenerate all the debug output, but the point i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79766
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
--- Comment #27 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Well, the valgrind output actually exactly that the comparison is optimized
away.
I actually would have to regenerate all the debug output, but the point is that
for the first appearance in the random seed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79767
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79782
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40863
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40863&action=edit
gcc7-pr79782.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79773
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79772
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79514
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79784
Bug ID: 79784
Summary: Synchronization overhead is thrashing on Aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79782
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
