https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79772
Bug ID: 79772
Summary: [6/7 Regression][CHKP] ICE on invalid code in
chkp_process_stmt (tree-chkp.c:4034)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79771
Bug ID: 79771
Summary: in-tree zlib breaks build
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32110
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79770
Bug ID: 79770
Summary: [CHKP] ICE in chkp_find_bounds_1 (chkp_find_bounds:
Unexpected tree code vector_cst)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79769
Bug ID: 79769
Summary: [CHKP] ICE in chkp_find_bounds_1 (Unexpected tree code
complex_cst)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79764
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I was not right, BIT_FIELD_REF is new in GCC 7, thus it can't be latent. It's
just not handled in the switch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79768
--- Comment #2 from Casper Ti. Vector ---
Created attachment 40856
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40856&action=edit
Output of `sed '/^#/d; /^[ \t]*$/d' < gcc_bug.i'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79768
--- Comment #1 from Casper Ti. Vector ---
Created attachment 40855
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40855&action=edit
Output of `gcc -v -save-temps -Wall -O2 -c gcc_bug.c -o gcc_bug.o'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79768
Bug ID: 79768
Summary: `-Wmaybe-uninitialized' false positive with
optimisation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79767
Bug ID: 79767
Summary: inline namespace and unqualified definition
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53402
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79766
Bug ID: 79766
Summary: inline namespace and ::
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79439
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40851|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79439
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79439
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:13:42PM +, acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752
>
> --- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Meissner spotted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79765
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79765
Bug ID: 79765
Summary: [CHKP] ICE in create_target_clone in
multiple_target.c:211
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79764
Bug ID: 79764
Summary: [7 Regression][CHKP] ICE in
chkp_make_addressed_object_bounds: Unexpected tree
code bit_field_ref in tree-chkp.c:3528
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79763
Bug ID: 79763
Summary: [CHKP] ICE in chkp_find_bounds: Unexpected tree code
real_cst in tree-chkp.c:3681
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79737
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 28 22:39:11 2017
New Revision: 245795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79737
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c (e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79762
Bug ID: 79762
Summary: [CHKP] [6/7 Regression] ICE in verify_cgraph_node
failed (node is weakref but not an transparent_alias)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79761
Bug ID: 79761
Summary: [CHKP] ICE in chkp_find_bounds_1, at tree-chkp.c:3452
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79749
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
/sparc.c (sparc_frame_pointer_required): Add missing
condition on optimize for the leaf function test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/20170228-1.c
- copied unchanged from r245791,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/20170228-1.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-br
/sparc.c (sparc_frame_pointer_required): Add missing
condition on optimize for the leaf function test.
Added:
branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/20170228-1.c
- copied unchanged from r245791,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/20170228-1.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-6-br
/sparc.c (sparc_frame_pointer_required): Add missing
condition on optimize for the leaf function test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/20170228-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79625
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Feb 28 22:04:32 2017
New Revision: 245790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not allow to run GIMPLE or RTL test-cases w/ LTO (PR lto/79625).
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79625
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79760
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40850
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40850&action=edit
lto object file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79760
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40849
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40849&action=edit
lto object file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79760
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40848
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40848&action=edit
lto object file
application-main -g -Os -version
-fltrans-output-list=application.elf.ltrans.out -fwpa -fresolution=my.res
-flinker-output=exec application-main.o gate.o gate_debounce.o
GNU GIMPLE (GCC) version 6.3.1 20170228 (avr-elf)
compiled by GNU C version 6.3.1 20170202 [gcc-6-branch revision
245119], GMP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79759
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79697
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6)
> * malloc, strdup, etc are not pure!
Ahh, of course not. Nevermind. :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79753
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79748
--- Comment #3 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
Well, I remembered I omitted another simple situation in which it would help.
But because this attribute does not exist right now, I'll have to show you a
"what-it-could-be" output code if it did exist.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Meissner spotted the cause. Verified that this fixes it:
Index: ../trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
===
--- ../trunk/gcc/config/r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79759
Bug ID: 79759
Summary: [concepts] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13509
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846
--- Comment #6 from mirco ---
Hi all,
I spent some time today working on this bug. I found a small modification that
allows to build without errors and that seems to work (I did a very preliminary
test).
At the moment I'm working with "gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79741
--- Comment #4 from Jim Michaels ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> And the exact options you are using?
g++ -std=c++11 -lstdc++ -o atoi64.o atoi64.cpp 2>atoi64.err.txt
also tried c++14.
Tue 02/28/2017 11:44:25.43 l:\projects\l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79746
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79697
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> Why do we have to special case these functions? Why can't we do this for
> all functions that are marked as const/pure, since we know they have no side
> effects o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79697
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79746
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79739
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79739
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Feb 28 19:32:02 2017
New Revision: 245787
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245787&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-28 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79739
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79755
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79739
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4)
> As the guilty party, I had better take it on!
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
The problem is that there is a type mismatch between the declarations for
'cafun'. Since the type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65656
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116
--- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We should create another PR for additional copy instructions after my patch and
close this one. IMHO they are two different issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79757
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79757
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79758
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Even r104500 ICEs so this is an ancient issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79758
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79756
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Could've started with r192721.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79756
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79755
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79755
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79758
Bug ID: 79758
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have
'exceptional' (error_mark) in
store_parm_decls_oldstyle, at c/c-decl.c:8973
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79754
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79757
Bug ID: 79757
Summary: ICE in declare_vars, at gimplify.c:634
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79756
Bug ID: 79756
Summary: ICE in execute_todo, at passes.c:2011
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79755
Bug ID: 79755
Summary: ICE: segfault in cgraph_node::get, at cgraph.h:1261
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79754
Bug ID: 79754
Summary: ICE in type_natural_mode, at config/i386/i386.c:8760
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79749
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79753
Bug ID: 79753
Summary: ICE in ix86_expand_builtin, at
config/i386/i386.c:36869
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79733
--- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Nothing fancy at all, no arch-specific flags.
$ gcc-7-20170226 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=.../bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=.../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79749
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79720
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79691
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752
Bug ID: 79752
Summary: incorrect code generation for __divkf3 with -O2
-mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79691
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Feb 28 16:59:16 2017
New Revision: 245782
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245782&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79691 - -Wformat-truncation suppressed by (and only b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79729
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Summary|ICE in ix86_print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79751
Bug ID: 79751
Summary: Concept placeholder on another concept doe not work
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79729
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 28 16:24:56 2017
New Revision: 245781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79729
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116
--- Comment #12 from Pat Haugen ---
Now that pr77536 has been fixed can this issue be closed? The first testcase no
longer has any loads from the stack in the loop, but does have 4 reg copies
that seem like they could get cleaned up (RA/reload is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79746
--- Comment #1 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com ---
Actually this is interesting; this code (derived from the previous one)
compiles without warning in GCC 7.0 and Clang, but gives an error in GCC 6.3:
struct Base {
Base(const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
Bug 45397 depends on bug 79740, which changed state.
Bug 79740 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE on -Os and above in both 32-bit and
64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in VN_INFO_GET, at
tree-ssa-sccvn.c:407 })
https://gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79748
--- Comment #2 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
I tried -O3 -fipa-ra on the following example code but it seems it doesn't do
what I suggested: (I used inline asm to force it to use a callee-saved
register, no other reason... just to demonstrate)
#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79740
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 28 15:32:24 2017
New Revision: 245780
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245780&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79740
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79731
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 28 15:31:30 2017
New Revision: 245779
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245779&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-28 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/79731
* fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79750
Bug ID: 79750
Summary: -Wimplicit-fallthrough= comment detection gets
confused by #if
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79721
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 40844
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40844&action=edit
untested patch
After this patch re-writing to unsigned in final value replacement shouldn't be
needed anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79749
Bug ID: 79749
Summary: Many sparc testcases FAIL at -O0 with
-fomit-frame-pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79742
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79742
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Feb 28 14:17:29 2017
New Revision: 245775
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245775&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR79742 incorrect scheduler choice.
Due to an oversight,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71659
postmaster at raasu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||postmaster at raasu dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78747
Priyanka Sabharwal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||priyanka.sabharwal@clearswi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79748
Bug ID: 79748
Summary: [Enhancement] no_callee_saved_registers function
attribute (on x86)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79747
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
> 2) -malign-call is still present in documentation => I'll prepare patch for
This one is valid arc option, I overlooked that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bernds at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79747
Bug ID: 79747
Summary: Missing documentation for
-malign-{jumps,label,loops,functions}= and strange
value range limitation
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79732
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
