https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Fixed on the trunk so far.
FWIW I stared at the code for some time but couldn't devise anything better
than your patch. The hunk itself is somewhat suspi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70390
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79511
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79668
Bug ID: 79668
Summary: [c++1z] inconsistent handling of parameter matching in
template template arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79667
Bug ID: 79667
Summary: spurious -Wunused-variable on a local array of struct
declared unused
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Although gcc says
x.c: In function ‘fn1’:
x.c:16:32: warning: ‘~’ on a boolean expression [-Wbool-operation]
d = ~((h ^ b.a) & 132 & (~(f && g) | (d && 1)));
^
x.c:16:32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRME
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.1 20170221 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79544
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79665
--- Comment #3 from Josh Stone ---
I'm using just -O3, and then I compared effects with and without -fwrapv to
figure out what's going on. Clang is only faster without -fwrapv.
With -march=native on my Sandy Bridge, a few instructions are place
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79665
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
vsz.bugzilla at emailuser dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79665
Bug ID: 79665
Summary: gcc's signed (x*x)/200 is slower than clang's
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
URL: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39446#issueco
mment-280798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
--- Comment #15 from Eduard Braun ---
> Setting status to resolved/fixed.
I don't think this is merged yet!
There's only a patch MINGW-packages, if this works out it should be fixed
upstream!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79664
Bug ID: 79664
Summary: ICE with #pragma omp parallel in constexpr function
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
I'm not entirely sure. But the trouble with the test case is that it converts
between signed and unsigned integers with different sizes. The async_jobs
variable's type is int but memset takes size_t (which i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79535
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41727
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |rejects-valid
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50308
Bug 50308 depends on bug 17729, which changed state.
Bug 17729 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] Duplicate __attribute__((deprecated))
warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41727
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 21 20:50:57 2017
New Revision: 245642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/41727 - ICE with partial spec of partial instantiation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50308
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 21 20:51:03 2017
New Revision: 245643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/50308 - wrong deprecated warning with ADL
PR c++/1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50308
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
--- Comment #38 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 21 20:51:03 2017
New Revision: 245643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/50308 - wrong deprecated warning with ADL
PR c++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79511
--- Comment #9 from ww898 ---
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
static char const src[] = "\xE2\x82\xAC";
std::wstring_convert> conv;
auto const dst = conv.from_bytes(src);
std::cout << std::hex << std::setw(4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79535
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Feb 21 20:23:09 2017
New Revision: 245641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79535
* cp-tree.h (maybe_reject_flexarray_init):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
vsz.bugzilla at emailuser dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|missed-optimization |ra
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
--- Comment #13 from vsz.bugzilla at emailuser dot net ---
Repeating the minimal tests with MSYS2
`mingw-w64-{i686,x86_64}-binutils-2.27-4-any` (the build that includes the
proposed patch), it seems the problem is now fixed for both 32-bit and 64-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79621
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |missed-optimization
Summary|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
mati865 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mati865 at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Even further reduced test
module cgca_m3clvg
interface
subroutine cgca_clvgs_abstract()
end subroutine cgca_clvgs_abstract
module subroutine cgca_clvgp(sub)
procedure( cgca_clvgs_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Feb 21 18:29:57 2017
New Revision: 245640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79593
* config/i386/i386.md (standard_x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Further reduced test
module cgca_m3clvg
abstract interface
subroutine cgca_clvgs_abstract()
end subroutine cgca_clvgs_abstract
end interface
interface
module subroutine cgca_clvgp(sub)
pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79654
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79589
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on |[5/6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79654
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 18:00:35 2017
New Revision: 245639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79654
* decl.c (cp_finish_decomp): Don't set decl's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79589
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 17:59:07 2017
New Revision: 245638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/79589
* decl.c: Include gimplify.h.
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79621
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Feb 21 17:58:00 2017
New Revision: 245637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79621
* gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c (fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79655
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 17:57:23 2017
New Revision: 245636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79655
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_array_reference): Dia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79639
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79639
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 17:48:57 2017
New Revision: 245635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79639
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79633
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 17:46:42 2017
New Revision: 245634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245634&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79633
* tree-chkp-opt.c (chkp_optimize_string_fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50308
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79511
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79639
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE with |[5/6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 16:56:11 2017
New Revision: 245633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79570
* sel-sched.c (moveup_expr_cached): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79641
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 16:55:00 2017
New Revision: 245632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79641
* c-attribs.c (handle_mode_attribute): Use bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79663
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unfortunately, 2) is not appropriate, in non-ZERO chain case, the root combined
statement is used to setup next iterations combined result, it's not for
CSE-use in this iteration. Manually insert r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79639
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79661
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78139
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79649
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 16:29:37 2017
New Revision: 245631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245631&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79649
* tree-loop-distribution.c (cla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79663
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79663
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Root cause understood. After patch, combine_chains looks like:
/* Process in reverse order so dominance point is ready when it comes
to the root ref. */
for (i = ch1->refs.length (); i >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #19)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> > Created attachment 40808 [details]
> > gcc7-pr70465-2.patch
> >
> > Now actually working patch for this testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79663
Bug ID: 79663
Summary: r244815 causes 10% regression for spec1k/172.mgrid on
AArch64
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt ---
OK, thanks, that helps. We'll evaluate the cost model here and figure out
what's best.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
--- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> Created attachment 40808 [details]
> gcc7-pr70465-2.patch
>
> Now actually working patch for this testcase.
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41727
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79494
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
--- Comment #13 from Katsunori Kumatani
---
Ah sorry! I skimmed through that as I thought it was talking about the patch's
fld (that it improved). Thanks, it's good to know the cause at least :) I hope
it makes it easier to improve if needed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79658
--- Comment #6 from Pedro Alves ---
Created attachment 40807
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40807&action=edit
reproducer v3
Slightly reduced testcase. enum_flags no longer a template, and
stores/uses/converts to int instea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40808
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40808&action=edit
gcc7-pr70465-2.patch
Now actually working patch for this testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
When I tried to limit the memory allocation to reasonable size,
I triggered the warning again, with this modified check:
@@ -1393,6 +1393,12 @@ int speed_main(int argc, char **argv)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So:
--- gcc/reg-stack.c.jj 2017-01-26 09:46:03.0 +0100
+++ gcc/reg-stack.c 2017-02-21 16:10:28.969463832 +0100
@@ -897,10 +897,13 @@ emit_swap_insn (rtx_insn *insn, stack_pt
fld a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79602
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79662
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79662
Bug ID: 79662
Summary: ICE on invalid code in convert_arguments in
c/c-typeck.c:3452
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79658
--- Comment #5 from Pedro Alves ---
Created attachment 40806
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40806&action=edit
reproducer v2
Same code as the previous comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79661
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79658
--- Comment #4 from Pedro Alves ---
Here's a better one:
template
struct enum_flags
{
enum_flags &operator|= (E e)
{
m_enum_value = (E) (m_enum_value | e);
return *this;
}
operat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79494
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 21 14:39:21 2017
New Revision: 245629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79494
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_split_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
For PA it selects i as IV (reasonable). For power it looks like it tries to
use
sth with auto-inc (pre-inc). Not sure if that's reasonable cost-wise. You
decide (and then skip, like for PA, if so).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79654
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Agreed. I can send both to mailing list later today, if you don't beat me to it
(I'm going out now to run some errands)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Reduced test
module cgca_m3clvg
abstract interface
subroutine cgca_clvgs_abstract( farr, marr, n, cstate, debug, &
newstate )
integer, parameter :: iarr =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79639
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40805
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40805&action=edit
gcc7-pr79639.patch
Untested fix. Not really sure about it though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79654
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, I'd prefer both patches (of course just a single testcase). For the
decomp, there is really nothing wrong with the artificial var's type, and there
could be other places lurking which are upset about e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
Also, there's an introduced ivtmp, rather than using p as an ivar.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79654
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Created attachment 40804
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40804&action=edit
Alternate patch
Hi Jakub. I'm attaching what I was about to send... Maybe makes sense to
tighten prune_vars_ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt ---
So for POWER, at least, the IV for i is not eliminated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79658
--- Comment #3 from Pedro Alves ---
> For your testcase foo () is quickly optimized to nothing given ef is unused.
Shouldn't that be true for "bar ()" too then?
Looks like I over reduced. I'll try again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79660
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
OK, thanks, I'm going to cancel my validations with your "proposed fix", then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79579
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Feb 21 14:01:52 2017
New Revision: 245628
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 79579] Avoid segfault on NULL ipa_edge_args_vector
2017-02-21 Mart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79658
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
For your testcase foo () is quickly optimized to nothing given ef is unused.
For -O0 we only warn before inlining.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79345
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01284.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79660
mpf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
--- Comment #19 from mpf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpf
Date: Tue Feb 21 13:29:07 2017
New Revision: 245626
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245626&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert r245598
gcc/
PR target/78660
Revert:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 79656 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79656
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
