[Bug rtl-optimization/79125] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79125 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from A

[Bug rtl-optimization/79125] New: [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79125 Bug ID: 79125 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block) Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug target/78875] -fstack-protector on powerpc64 now always use TLS, won't work for kernel/firmware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78875 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/29838] -fstack-protector shouldn't use TLS in freestanding mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29838 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Schwinge --- See also PR78875.

[Bug rtl-optimization/72488] [7 Regression] wrong code (SIGFPE) at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in the 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72488 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So, just to record some thoughts. There's about a half-dozen patches, mostly from the August timeframe that will make this bug go latent. The general theme across them is they change the order in which we

[Bug c++/79124] New: Internal compiler error under certain cases where __attribute__((target("avx2"))) presents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79124 Bug ID: 79124 Summary: Internal compiler error under certain cases where __attribute__((target("avx2"))) presents Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/79122] go test -race reports import cycles with gccgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79122 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Note that the race detector doesn't work at all with gccgo. So while this is a pretty bad error message, the only fix for this bug is going to be to produce a better error message.

[Bug middle-end/79123] New: incorrect -Walloca-larger-than: alloca may be too large due to conversion from long int to long unsigned int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79123 Bug ID: 79123 Summary: incorrect -Walloca-larger-than: alloca may be too large due to conversion from long int to long unsigned int Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug target/79004] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float128-ieee.c with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79004] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float128-ieee.c with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79004 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Wed Jan 18 00:35:29 2017 New Revision: 244561 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244561&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-17 Michael Meissner PR target/79004 * gc

[Bug target/79112] [SH] libgo/go/exp/terminal/util.go:70:23: error: integer constant overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79112 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima --- It seems that the error message says all. TIOCGWINSZ is defined as #define TIOCGWINSZ0x80087468 /* _IOR('t', 104, struct winsize) */ in the SH kernel header asm/ioctls.h. Perhaps you could chan

[Bug go/79122] go test -race reports import cycles with gccgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79122 --- Comment #1 from Alan --- Reported as: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18696 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79122

[Bug go/79122] New: go test -race reports import cycles with gccgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79122 Bug ID: 79122 Summary: go test -race reports import cycles with gccgo Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug tree-optimization/77445] [7 Regression] Performance drop after r239219 on coremark test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/78875] -fstack-protector on powerpc64 now always use TLS, won't work for kernel/firmware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78875 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Jan 17 22:02:42 2017 New Revision: 244556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244556&root=gcc&view=rev Log: -mstack-protector-guard and friends (PR78875) Currently, on PowerPC

[Bug debug/78839] [6 Regression] DWARF output different between GCC 5 and 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 20:34:58 2017 New Revision: 244555 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244555&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/78839 * dwarf2out.c (field_byte_offset): Restore

[Bug libstdc++/69600] [5 Regression] Incorrect use of copy-assignment instead of move assignment from function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69600 --- Comment #6 from sshannin at gmail dot com --- Thanks for the update : )

[Bug c++/78341] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in cp_parser_std_attribute_spec, at cp/parser.c:24597)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78341 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 20:34:17 2017 New Revision: 244554 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244554&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-01-11 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/50199] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -flto -fno-merge-constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 20:33:16 2017 New Revision: 244553 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244553&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-01-11 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/78949] incorrect "unused variable" warning with SSE2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 20:32:27 2017 New Revision: 244552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244552&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-01-04 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/78693] [6 Regression] Bogus 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78693 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 20:31:40 2017 New Revision: 244551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244551&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-01-04 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71182] [6 Regression] parser.c cp_lexer_previous_token sanitizer detects member call on null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 20:30:25 2017 New Revision: 244550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244550&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-01-04 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 20:29:19 2017 New Revision: 244549 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244549&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-12-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug preprocessor/79106] wrong source line printed in diagnostics for a translation unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- That's right. I believe printing the contents of the translation unit and not even opening the files referenced by the #line directives in it like Clang does is the expected and correct behavior. Not just to

[Bug c++/78488] [7 Regression] P0136R1 ICE when building call to inherited default constructor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78488 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug driver/69361] Nonsensical suggestion for misspelled command-line option "-help"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62314] Fix-it Hints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71497] Warning text for -Wmisleading-indentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71497 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78469] [7 Regression] defaulted default constructor causes bogus requirement for accessible destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78469 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/77629] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: same canonical type node for different types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77629 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69481] ICE with C++11 alias using with templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69481 --- Comment #15 from Nathan Sidwell --- *** Bug 77629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/79121] [6/7 Regression] invalid expansion of sign-extend unsigned plus left shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79121 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77629] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: same canonical type node for different types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77629 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71437] [7 regression] Performance regression after r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437 --- Comment #10 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to amker from comment #9) > Root cause should be in VRP, looks like the iterative algorithm depends on > order of ssa operands and computes different range. Testing a patch, though is ki

[Bug fortran/78983] [7 Regression] ICE with CAF-DT with allocatable member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot or

[Bug rtl-optimization/79121] [6/7 Regression] invalid expansion of sign-extend unsigned plus left shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79121 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- The problem is config/i386/rtemself.h has #define LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE (TARGET_80387 ? 80 : 64) XFmode isn't available with -msoft-float even when -mlong-double-80 is used. IA MCU defaults long double to double

[Bug rtl-optimization/79121] New: [6, 7 regression] invalid expansion of sign-extend unsigned plus left shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79121 Bug ID: 79121 Summary: [6, 7 regression] invalid expansion of sign-extend unsigned plus left shift Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong

[Bug bootstrap/79052] bootstrap-ubsan failures due to warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79052 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Here's a complete set of warnings from a bootstrap configured with --with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan and --disable-werror. I think GCC builds libraries without -Werror so those are probably not causing any

[Bug libstdc++/78346] [5/6/7 Regression] std::search with binary comparison predicate uses invalid reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78346 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.5 Version|unknown

[Bug sanitizer/79096] [7 Regression] address sanitizer and jni does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79096 --- Comment #2 from physiker at toast2 dot net --- > Am 16.01.2017 um 15:18 schrieb m.ostapenko at samsung dot com > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79096 > > Maxim Ostapenko changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11) > (In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #9) > > > I could pursue this but is soft-float on the x86 target really worth the > > investment of any effort? AFAIK we would

[Bug bootstrap/79120] New: lm32 ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.c:1747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79120 Bug ID: 79120 Summary: lm32 ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.c:1747 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug debug/63741] lm32 ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.c:1677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63741 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/63741] lm32 ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.c:1677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63741 --- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill --- We are using gcc 4.9.3 for RTEMS 4.11 and gcc 6.3.0 on RTEMS 4.12. This doesn't happen on either GCC. So closing.

[Bug tree-optimization/79119] absolute value of a pointer difference can be assumed to be less than or equal to PTRDIFF_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79119 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|no

[Bug tree-optimization/79119] New: absolute value of a pointer difference can be assumed to be less than or equal to PTRDIFF_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79119 Bug ID: 79119 Summary: absolute value of a pointer difference can be assumed to be less than or equal to PTRDIFF_MAX Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/79118] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79118 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- The original preprocessed file started ICEing with -Wall -std=gnu++14 with r219268: In file included from /mnt/g/boostish/outcome/test/../include/boost/outcome/v1.0/monad.hpp:98:0, from /mn

[Bug rtl-optimization/78952] Combine does not convert 8-bit sign-extract to a zero-extract for QImode operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78952 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Note avr has an "any_extract" code_iterator for this. That of course is a crutch but could be a workaround for you for now.

[Bug tree-optimization/71437] [7 regression] Performance regression after r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Root cause should be in VRP, looks like the iterative algorithm depends on order of ssa operands and computes different range.

[Bug debug/78839] [6 Regression] DWARF output different between GCC 5 and 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] DWARF |[6 Regression] DWARF output

[Bug debug/78839] [6/7 Regression] DWARF output different between GCC 5 and 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 18:32:13 2017 New Revision: 244545 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244545&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/78839 * dwarf2out.c (field_byte_offset): Restore

[Bug c++/61636] generic lambda: segfault / "cannot call member function without object"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61636] generic lambda: segfault / "cannot call member function without object"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636 --- Comment #24 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Tue Jan 17 18:22:34 2017 New Revision: 244544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244544&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61636 * cp-tree.h (maybe_generic_this_capture):

[Bug libstdc++/78346] std::search with binary comparison predicate uses invalid reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78346 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/79118] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79118 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Ah, g++ 6 ICEs with -Wall.

[Bug libstdc++/78346] std::search with binary comparison predicate uses invalid reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78346 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/67205] eliminate No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code restriction violations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67205 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/67205] eliminate No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code restriction violations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67205 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Jan 17 18:02:55 2017 New Revision: 244543 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244543&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/67205 * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (TARGET_CUSTO

[Bug tree-optimization/70754] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE during predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754 --- Comment #9 from Vidya Praveen --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > I've got patch for that. If you would like, I can test it for aarch64-none-linux-gnu.

[Bug target/79058] [7 Regression] ARM: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug preprocessor/79106] wrong source line printed in diagnostics for a translation unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/69600] [5 Regression] Incorrect use of copy-assignment instead of move assignment from function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69600 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77334] [5/6/7 Regression] Cannot move assign std::map with non-copyable and non-movable mapped_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77334 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sshannin at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #9) > > I.e., the bug was enabling unintended soft-fp usage of XFmode at the same > > time as enabling usage of TFmode. The TFmode functions should be kept in > > li

[Bug debug/71669] DW_AT_data_bit_offset is not emitted for dwarf4 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71669 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/71669] DW_AT_data_bit_offset is not emitted for dwarf4 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71669 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 17:42:06 2017 New Revision: 244542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244542&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/71669 * dwarf2out.c (add_data_member_location_att

[Bug libstdc++/78595] Unnecessary copies in _Rb_tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78595 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/68869] map::insert(P&&) broken in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68869 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78595] Unnecessary copies in _Rb_tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78595 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6) > Am still seeing "random" truncation, even with the DejaGnu patch in comment > #4. Which Linux kernel version? there has been some bugs in some newer kernels. I

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #9 from Joel Sherrill --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5) > On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 > > > > --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak

[Bug c++/79118] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79118 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/76731] [AVX512] _mm512_i32gather_epi32 and other scatter/gather routines have incorrect signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Jan 17 17:03:00 2017 New Revision: 244540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244540&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/76731 * config/i386/avx512fintrin.h

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7) > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, joel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > I.e., the bug was enabling unintended soft-fp usage of XFmode at the same > > > time as enab

[Bug c++/79118] New: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79118 Bug ID: 79118 Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2258 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/78384] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 15)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78384 --- Comment #4 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Any progress with this? It fell through the cracks over christmas vacation, I'll get to it this week.

[Bug target/79079] [6/7] Wrong code gen for __builtin_mul_overflow when TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION (32, 64) == false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79079 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 16:56:30 2017 New Revision: 244539 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244539&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/79079 * internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): Use

[Bug c++/70565] [5/6 Regression] ICE at gimplify.c:8832 (cilkplus array extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE at |[5/6 Regression] ICE at

[Bug c++/70565] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE at gimplify.c:8832 (cilkplus array extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Jan 17 16:54:55 2017 New Revision: 244538 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244538&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70565 * cp-array-notation.c (expand_array_notation

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, joel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > I.e., the bug was enabling unintended soft-fp usage of XFmode at the same > > time as enabling usage of TFmode. The TFmode functions

[Bug target/62254] [5/6/7 Regression] gcc-4.9 ICEs on linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/79117] __builtin_isfinite edge case incorrect on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79117 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- If you use -fexcess-precision=standard, the classification built-in functions should convert values with excess range and precision to their semantic types as required by ISO C (see c-typec

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5) > On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 > > > > --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak

[Bug testsuite/79115] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78768.c execution test on arm, aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79115 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79058] [7 Regression] ARM: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058 --- Comment #28 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #27) > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #26) > > (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #24) > > > While you're at it ... does it have the same or a si

[Bug testsuite/79115] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78768.c execution test on arm, aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79115 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 17 16:36:55 2017 New Revision: 244537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244537&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/79115 - FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78768.c execution test on arm, aarch64

[Bug c/79117] __builtin_isfinite edge case incorrect on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79117 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- You can use __builtin_isinf here, so: if (__builtin_isinf(c)) { puts("finite"); } else { puts("not finite"); } The expansion of __builtin_isinf performs value truncation automa

[Bug c++/71497] Warning text for -Wmisleading-indentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71497 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Jan 17 16:33:44 2017 New Revision: 244536 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244536&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix wording of -Wmisleading-indentation (PR c++/71497) gcc/c-family/Ch

[Bug tree-optimization/71437] [7 regression] Performance regression after r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437 --- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to amker from comment #7) > I think it's not PRE's fault. The input to PRE is already sub-optimal to be > handled. > Look at the source code: > > for( i = 0 ; i < ( I - 1 ) ; i++

[Bug target/79058] [7 Regression] ARM: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058 --- Comment #27 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #26) > (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #24) > > While you're at it ... does it have the same or a similar cause as the Avr > > bug? > > https://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug preprocessor/79106] wrong source line printed in diagnostics for a translation unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/79058] [7 Regression] ARM: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058 --- Comment #26 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #24) > While you're at it ... does it have the same or a similar cause as the Avr > bug? > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883 > > (A HImode quantity

[Bug tree-optimization/71437] [7 regression] Performance regression after r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think it's not PRE's fault. The input to PRE is already sub-optimal to be handled. Look at the source code: for( i = 0 ; i < ( I - 1 ) ; i++ ) { if( ( L < pL[i+1] ) &

[Bug target/79058] [7 Regression] ARM: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058 --- Comment #25 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Jan 17 16:11:55 2017 New Revision: 244535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244535&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-17 Vladimir Makarov PR target/79058 * i

[Bug tree-optimization/71854] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71854 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Am still seeing "random" truncation, even with the DejaGnu patch in comment #4.

[Bug tree-optimization/71854] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71854 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 17 15:50:24 2017 New Revision: 244534 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244534&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71854 * gcc.dg/vect/pr71854.c: New te

[Bug tree-optimization/71854] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71854 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- This has been fixed with r244218. I'll commit the testcase and close this.

  1   2   >