https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
--- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
I've applied a quick fix. I'd like to keep this open for further
checks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
--- Comment #19 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue Jan 17 04:07:51 2017
New Revision: 244516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244516&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78633
* config/sh/sh.md (cmpeqsi_t+1): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79066
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79066
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Jan 17 02:54:11 2017
New Revision: 244515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244515&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR79066, non-PIC code generated for powerpc glibc with -fpic
PR tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 40526
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40526&action=edit
Patch I am testing
The profile is quite inconsistent since thread1.
The problem is that duplicate_thread_path do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79111
Bug ID: 79111
Summary: demangle_template tries to allocate
18446744070799748648 bytes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53203
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #31 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #30)
> >
> > When I looked at gap at the time, the main change was the reordering of a
> > few
> > if statements in several hot functions. Incorrect block frequencies also
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #30 from Jan Hubicka ---
>
> When I looked at gap at the time, the main change was the reordering of a few
> if statements in several hot functions. Incorrect block frequencies also
> change
> register allocation in a bad way, but I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79110
Bug ID: 79110
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/format/pr78304.c (test for warnings,
line 9)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #29 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #28)
> > On SPEC2000 the latest changes look good, compared to the old predictor gap
> > improved by 10% and INT/FP by 0.8%/0.6%. I'll run SPEC2006 tonight.
>
> It is rather su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79109
Bug ID: 79109
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jan 17 00:14:52 2017
New Revision: 244511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244511&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78608 - gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:570:17: runtime error:
n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79095
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79095
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017
New Revision: 244509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-16 Jeff Law
PR tree-optimization/79090
PR tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79090
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017
New Revision: 244509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-16 Jeff Law
PR tree-optimization/79090
PR tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017
New Revision: 244509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-16 Jeff Law
PR tree-optimization/79090
PR tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
--- Comment #32 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017
New Revision: 244509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-16 Jeff Law
PR tree-optimization/79090
PR tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79107
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka ---
> On SPEC2000 the latest changes look good, compared to the old predictor gap
> improved by 10% and INT/FP by 0.8%/0.6%. I'll run SPEC2006 tonight.
It is rather surprising you are seeing such large changes fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE/Segfault with |Strange typespec with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79108
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49726
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] -g0 |[5/6 Regression] -g0 file.S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79108
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note "--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0" is required to
reproduce the issue. Otherwise it passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79089
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 16 21:35:30 2017
New Revision: 244507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/79089
* gimplify.c (gimplify_init_constructor): If wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79080
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 16 21:34:35 2017
New Revision: 244506
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244506&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79080
* loop-doloop.c (doloop_modify): Call unsh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> Looks like a GC issue as I was reducing the code but removing the comments
> and empty lines caused the testcase to no longer crash. Adding --param
> ggc-min-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Andrew Senkevich from comment #10)
> > This commit breaks 5 SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks (416.gamess, 454.calculix,
> > 459.GemsFDTD, 465.tonto, 481.wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49726
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 16 21:33:07 2017
New Revision: 244505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244505&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR driver/49726
* gcc.c (debug_level_greater_than_spec_fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79108
Bug ID: 79108
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE on some fortran code with -flto
-Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: GC, ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Senkevich from comment #10)
> This commit breaks 5 SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks (416.gamess, 454.calculix,
> 459.GemsFDTD, 465.tonto, 481.wrf) with ICE on x86_64 (and looks like on
> aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Okay, I'll make it work for SVR4 in the rs6000 backend then.
The generic code makes suboptimal code, many ABIs need to update (even
those that haven't changed for 25 years), and more backends will need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> Followup was here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2016-02/msg6.html
which is:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=commitdiff;h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Followup was here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2016-02/msg6.html
2016-02-15 Ben Elliston
Reported by David Malcolm.
* lib/dejagnu.exp (text): Allow angle brack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79107
Bug ID: 79107
Summary: ICE on name resolution within internal subroutine
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106
Bug ID: 79106
Summary: wrong source line printed in diagnostics for a
translation unit
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40514|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40524
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40524&action=edit
gcc7-pr78835.patch
Untested patch that fixes the ICE on this testcase by marking directly called
functions as n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68933
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79105
Bug ID: 79105
Summary: Autovectorized NEON code slower than vfpv4 on Cortex
A5
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Jan 16 18:08:45 2017
New Revision: 244502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix testcases for PR c/78304
The testcases as written made assumptions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Compiling the test in comment 0 with -fcoarray=lib -lcaf_single at r244453
fails at link time with
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"_caf_token.0.3515", referenced from:
__caf_init.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79097
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
As a couple of additional data points EDG 4.11 and IBM XLC++ both reject the
test case. EDG with an error similar to GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Now, even going through all cgraph edges and marking the callee DIEs as used
(setting die_mark for them) early (but I guess it would be better to do the
early finish then after early optimizations, but before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104
Bug ID: 79104
Summary: [7.0 regression] ambiguity calling std::end on a local
constexpr array of structs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505
--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The effort is quite significant, because several support functions have to be
ported from other commits. I.e., I do not want to spend too much time on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #27 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #26)
> Hello, did the Gap scores on arm too? Both Itanium and PPC testers seems to
> show improved gap scores, so hope arm and the other ppc tester too.
On SP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The important thing is that it is only possible to refer to a single DIE in the
type unit (.debug.types.* in DWARF4, .debug_info DW_UT_type unit in DWARF5);
in the #c0 case it is the Bar DW_TAG_structure_type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176
mpf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
FWIW, new C floating-point types such as _Float16 and _Float32 are not
promoted in variable arguments either, which has required a few back-end
changes. Complex types such as _Complex floa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505
Zaak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from Zaa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #11 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #10)
> Yeah, but it seems that lto doesn't propagate source location either:
>
> /* Output info about new location into bitpack BP.
>After outputting bitpack,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 16 15:58:06 2017
New Revision: 244498
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244498&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR66145 use new ABI for std::ios::failure exceptions
PR libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79054
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
I committed r244497 to avoid exercising the test case on that line on
non-x86_64 targets. It passes on x86_64 with the native compiler and with a
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 cross-compiler, in both ILP32 and LP64 m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79051
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jan 16 15:50:47 2017
New Revision: 244497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/79051 - FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for warnings,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79103
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737
Bug 71737 depends on bug 79103, which changed state.
Bug 79103 Summary: [7 Regression] build_variant_type_copy ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79103
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jan 16 15:43:06 2017
New Revision: 244496
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244496&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/c-family
2017-01-16 Paolo Carlini
Revert:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79103
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79103
Bug ID: 79103
Summary: [7 Regression] build_variant_type_copy ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #14 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Jan 16 15:03:41 2017
New Revision: 244494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
system.h: Poison strndup (PR bootstrap/78616)
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps we could combine the #c1 patch with some changes to make sure we don't
prune those types that appear in callgraph edges callee contexts?
Is the early finish debug hook called after some minimal cgraph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79102
Bug ID: 79102
Summary: gcc fails to auto-vectorise the product of an array of
complex floats
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #10 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Yeah, but it seems that lto doesn't propagate source location either:
/* Output info about new location into bitpack BP.
After outputting bitpack, lto_output_location_data has
to be done to output a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463
--- Comment #16 from Milian Wolff ---
So how can I silence the warning then for the case I pasted in the first
comment:
~~~+
#include
template struct foo {};
foo emit_unexpected_warning;
int main() { return 0; }
~~~+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78781
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389
--- Comment #8 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Mon Jan 16 13:32:39 2017
New Revision: 244493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244493&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/78389 fix backwards size adjustments
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389
--- Comment #7 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Mon Jan 16 13:30:58 2017
New Revision: 244492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244492&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/78389 fix backwards size adjustments
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So initially we generate
DIE0: DW_TAG_GNU_call_site (0x768cd690)
abbrev id: 0 offset: 0 mark: 0
DW_AT_low_pc: label: *.LVL1
DW_AT_abstract_origin: address
but that later gets rewritten invali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
Indeed it is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79054
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> CCing Bin, he was looking into PRE/predcom as well AFAIR. predictive
> commoning here performs unrolling to be able to avoid some loop-carried
> depen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Senkevich ---
(In reply to Kirill Yukhin from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Senkevich from comment #8)
> > I think we should follow here declarations from icc headers to be compatible
> > with it.
> Okay. Could yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #1)
> > I'll report back tomorrow.
>
> Problem persists:
Correction: The patch fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79101
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78702
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78702
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 16 11:41:41 2017
New Revision: 244491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244491&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78702 fix accessibility of locale::facet::__shim
PR libstdc++/
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
