https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66826
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #5)
> maybe there are workarounds glibc could do to prevent tco without needing a
> new attribute...
X-posted to Glibc BZ: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Jan 14 06:16:23 2017
New Revision: 244461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
--- Comment #30 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Jan 14 06:16:23 2017
New Revision: 244461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Jan 14 06:16:23 2017
New Revision: 244461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20170113 (experimental) [trunk revision 244397] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79086
--- Comment #2 from Dave Gotwisner ---
Thanks. There's an equivalent bug over there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79087
Bug ID: 79087
Summary: CPATH environment variable not recognised.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79086
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79086
Bug ID: 79086
Summary: Localtime_r does a spinlock unnecessarily killing
performance when run millions of times
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
mpf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
Matthew Fortune changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Fortune ---
Created attachment 40518
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40518&action=edit
testcase
I have narrowed this bug down to a mis-compilation of gcc/c/c-decl.c where
there are a few code diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69375
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For the attached reproducer this condition is never true in
cp_build_qualified_type_real
/* But preserve any function-cv-quals on a FUNCTION_TYPE. */
if (TREE_CODE (type) == FUNCTION_TYPE)
type_qu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
Bug 77485 depends on bug 33562, which changed state.
Bug 33562 Summary: [5/6 Regression] aggregate DSE disabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69375
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
My front-end debugging skills are pitiful, but I've found something suspicious.
ptm_initializer uses TYPE_PTRMEM_POINTED_TO_TYPE to get that pointee type. For
this case that expands to TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_FN_TY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] wrong|[5/6 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
Bug 77485 depends on bug 33562, which changed state.
Bug 33562 Summary: [5/6 Regression] aggregate DSE disabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176
Doug Gilmore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doug.gilmore at imgtec dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69375
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #21 from Arnd Bergmann ---
// reduced version of 0xB0981CD0 file
long a;
struct {
int su_flags;
} * b;
struct nilfs_segment_usage *e;
void fn1();
enum { NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_ACTIVE, NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_DIRTY } fn2() {
return b->su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69375
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12)
> Regression fixed (regression marker removed). All that's left is to poison
> strndup in system.h
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69375
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63184
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69375
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65411
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77561
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Ed Catmur from comment #0)
> Clang is similarly incorrect;
Clang 3.5 had the same bug, but it was fixed for 3.6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79078
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu-9fbaow at upsuper dot org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77451
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77451
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is a compiler bug not a library one:
int main()
{
auto l = [](auto&&...) {};
l();
}
l.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
l.cc:4:5: error: no match for call to ‘(main()::) ()’
l();
^
l.cc:3:24:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #20 from Arnd Bergmann ---
// new reduced test case, build with "arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-7.0.0 -c -Os
-mbig-endian"
struct nilfs_segment_usage {
int su_flags;
} a;
enum { NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_ACTIVE, NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_DIRTY } fn1();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Jan 13 19:27:43 2017
New Revision: 244453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't suppress bogus usage of macros from system headers in -Wformat (P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63537
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70583
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71321
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
--- Comment #5 from Yichao Yu ---
Ping again? Anything new or I can help with here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77451
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65411
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 13 17:52:34 2017
New Revision: 244451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR65411 don't retry fclose on EINTR
PR libstdc++/65411
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36016
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35098
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-02-06 12:25:16 |2017-1-13
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33699
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68307
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||beck.ct at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65255
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> I have a patch for std::thread which would mean it doesn't use shared_ptr,
> so this wouldn't be a problem even if you don't use the same arm version.
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67214
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 71166, which changed state.
Bug 71166 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jan 13 17:27:54 2017
New Revision: 244450
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244450&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71166
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array18.C: New t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085
Bug ID: 79085
Summary: ICE with placement new to unaligned location
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Bug 11832 depends on bug 33315, which changed state.
Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64865
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32199
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70996
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78407
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
The following patch fixes the issue
===
--- symtab.c(revision 244386)
+++ symtab.c(working copy)
@@ -1989,13 +1989,12 @@ symtab_node::equa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534
--- Comment #18 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Jan 13 17:05:48 2017
New Revision: 28
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=28&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 78534 Change character length from int to size_t
In order to handle la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310
--- Comment #16 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Jan 13 17:05:48 2017
New Revision: 28
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=28&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 78534 Change character length from int to size_t
In order to handle la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78508
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Still broken, a couple of months later, in gcc dated 2017 Jan 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77451
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77442
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79076
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I forgot to mention that this was happening with 5.4.0 and 6.3.0 as well.
Then try with a standard configuration, in particular remove the in-tree
binutils if you don't use them! You can drop cloog and is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #19 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Created attachment 40516
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40516&action=edit
preprocessed linux-4.10/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c source, 0xB0981CD0 build
Another version of the source file, also s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #18 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Created attachment 40515
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40515&action=edit
preprocessed linux-4.10/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c source, 0x2F25F020 build
The file is slightly different, because o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78397
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Alexandre Martins from comment #4)
> Unfortunatly, it's not crashing into the __aeabi_read_tp function, but into
> the dynamic linker of freebsd (rtld-elf). For info, this function is located
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79078
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #17 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #16)
> Or rather this one which avoids triggering an assertion failure in
> in_hard_reg_set_p ():
I tried this version, and while it fixes the test case I originally r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79075
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79084
Bug ID: 79084
Summary: No warning for implicit double with complex specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
It did fail yesterday because of a SNAFU on my part (sorry about that) but in
r244378 I committed a fix that should have resolved the failure. Please check
again and let me know if it still shows up (I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Martin Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79075
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:53:07 2017
New Revision: 25
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=25&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add string_view support to COW std::string
PR libstdc++/79075
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79076
--- Comment #2 from Brian Vandenberg ---
> Right, the 4.9.x series is not longer supported.
I forgot to mention that this was happening with 5.4.0 and 6.3.0 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:46:22 2017
New Revision: 23
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=23&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61912
PR tree-optimization/77485
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:46:22 2017
New Revision: 23
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=23&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61912
PR tree-optimization/77485
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:37:09 2017
New Revision: 21
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=21&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] |[5/6 Regression] aggregate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:42:08 2017
New Revision: 22
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=22&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
--- Comment #26 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:42:08 2017
New Revision: 22
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=22&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:42:08 2017
New Revision: 22
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=22&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
--- Comment #25 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:37:09 2017
New Revision: 21
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=21&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 13 15:37:09 2017
New Revision: 21
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=21&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/33562
PR tree-optimization/61912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71190
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> Do you have still Markus the pre-processed source files available on the
> machine? Can you give me access?
No, I removed them some time ago.
But, as I w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71076
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71190
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Do you have still Markus the pre-processed source files available on the
machine? Can you give me access?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79075
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 13 14:57:33 2017
New Revision: 20
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Define cxx11-abi effective target for libstdc++ tests
PR libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #16 from Dominik Vogt ---
Or rather this one which avoids triggering an assertion failure in
in_hard_reg_set_p ():
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.c b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.c
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71406
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
