[Bug c/78498] [7 Regression] valgrind conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in format_type_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|preprocessor|c Summary|valgrind conditiona

[Bug libstdc++/78441] [variant] variant_alternative doesn't allow cv qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78441 --- Comment #1 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Sun Nov 27 00:32:04 2016 New Revision: 242892 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242892&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/78441 * include/std/variant: Propagate cv qualif

[Bug tree-optimization/20514] hoisting of label out of jumptable would take place at cse, should happen at trees

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20514 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Two things, we just don't jump thread. The testcase in comment #2 works correctly on the trunk: [15.0%]: i_lsm.3_8 = i; switch (i_lsm.3_8) [15.0%], case

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug bootstrap/78531] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78531 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug fortran/78518] [6/7 Regression] Warning format regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78518 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug sanitizer/78532] [7 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug middle-end/78294] [5/6/7 Regression] -fsanitize=thread broken by ignoring __attribute__((tls_model("initial-exec")))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug fortran/78299] [6 Regression] ICE in expand_omp_for_static_nochunk, at omp-low.c:9622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug driver/49726] [5/6/7 Regression] -g0 file.S -g does not produce debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49726 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5 Summary|[4.4/5/6/7 Regres

[Bug fortran/78356] [7 Regression] [OOP] segfault allocating polymorphic variable with polymorphic component with allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78356 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/78345] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid c++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:4464)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78345 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug tree-optimization/59642] Performance regression (4.7/4.8) with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59642 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/78349] function returning std::basic_string missing [abi:cxx11] tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78349 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78504] Bad fixit hint: '_Pragma' does not name a type; did you mean '_Pragma'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78504 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78391] g++ (any version) at O0 (for O1, O2, O3 is ok) doesn't warn when class members are used uninitialized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78391 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Severity|normal

[Bug c/78464] Feature request: automatic function multi versioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78464 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/78528] Recursion not optimized for structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78546] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/78546] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug middle-end/78540] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/78473] Enhancement request: __builtin_div_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78473 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78457] attempt to instantiate unused template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78457 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78504] Bad fixit hint: '_Pragma' does not name a type; did you mean '_Pragma'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78504 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed.

[Bug sanitizer/78541] [7 Regression] ICE when compiling libquadmath/printf/printf_fp.c with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78541 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/78547] [7 Regression] ICE: in loc_cmp, at var-tracking.c:3417 with -Os -g -mstringop-strategy=libcall -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78547 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- As noted by Dominique, the problem here has originally been introduced by r126826.

[Bug fortran/78545] Possible correction to online LTIME documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78545 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > Furthermore the documentation for LTIME should link to the related > > functions IDATE, ITIME and in particular the F95 standard intrinsic > >

[Bug fortran/78545] Possible correction to online LTIME documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78545 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Furthermore the documentation for LTIME should link to the related > functions IDATE, ITIME and in particular the F95 standard intrinsic > DATE_AND_TIME. Is the following addition to GMTIME and LTIM

[Bug rtl-optimization/78547] New: [7 Regression] ICE: in loc_cmp, at var-tracking.c:3417 with -Os -g -mstringop-strategy=libcall -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78547 Bug ID: 78547 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: in loc_cmp, at var-tracking.c:3417 with -Os -g -mstringop-strategy=libcall -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/78546] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40159|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > BTW did you test the patch in comment 4 with -m32? No, though I did test by reverting the few lines changing the definitions of gfc_charlen_type_node

[Bug bootstrap/78531] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78531 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug bootstrap/78531] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78531 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- > hmm, that doesn't look better: > > Breakpoint 1, __GI___fortify_fail (msg=msg@entry=0x769f487d "buffer > overflow detected") > at fortify_fail.c:28 > 28 fortify_fail.c: No such file or directo

[Bug tree-optimization/78546] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0) > Created attachment 40159 [details] > reduced testcase The attached testcase is not executable.

[Bug tree-optimization/78546] New: [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 Bug ID: 78546 Summary: [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority

[Bug fortran/78545] Possible correction to online LTIME documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78545 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unass

[Bug fortran/78545] Possible correction to online LTIME documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78545 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78545] New: Possible correction to online LTIME documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78545 Bug ID: 78545 Summary: Possible correction to online LTIME documentation Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- BTW did you test the patch in comment 4 with -m32?

[Bug testsuite/78544] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-*.c compilation, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78544 Bug ID: 78544 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-*.c compilation, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE on darwin Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/78542] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Og results in endless loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78543] New: [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 Bug ID: 78543 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug bootstrap/78531] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78531 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- hmm, that doesn't look better: Breakpoint 1, __GI___fortify_fail (msg=msg@entry=0x769f487d "buffer overflow detected") at fortify_fail.c:28 28 fortify_fail.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) b

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) > Will it help for pr66310? Probably yes, to the extent that with 64-bit indices the repeat count can be a lot larger than you can afford to buy RAM. :)

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Will it help for pr66310?

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #5) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > > > So are you going to do everything that is in the wiki (or mo

[Bug tree-optimization/78542] New: [7 Regression] wrong code at -Og results in endless loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542 Bug ID: 78542 Summary: [7 Regression] wrong code at -Og results in endless loop Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Sev

[Bug sanitizer/78541] New: [7 Regression] ICE when compiling libquadmath/printf/printf_fp.c with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78541 Bug ID: 78541 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE when compiling libquadmath/printf/printf_fp.c with -fsanitize=address Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug fortran/58175] [OOP] Incorrect warning message on scalar finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58175 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug tree-optimization/78540] New: [6/7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540 Bug ID: 78540 Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: i

[Bug tree-optimization/78533] tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78533 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Seems to be no problem by the time we get to revision 242887, dated 20161126.

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #5) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > > So are you going to do everything that is in the wiki (or most of it)? > > Also, I couldn't find in the list, I

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > So are you going to do everything that is in the wiki (or most of it)? > Also, I couldn't find in the list, I think some descriptor changes were > considered (t

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist --- Created attachment 40154 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40154&action=edit Preliminary patch Preliminary patch changing gfc_charlen_t from int to ptrdiff_t. Fails the char_result_8.f90

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme