[Bug c/78539] feature request: __noextension__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78539 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >Without that, I have to resort to using two cases: one for __STRICT_ANSI__ and one without I think you still need two. The reason is __noextension__ will turn off extensions even with -pedantic. Otherwise

[Bug libstdc++/71500] regex::icase only works on first character in a range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71500 --- Comment #12 from Michael Duggan --- Just a ping. I haven't seen a fix for this (even the basic case) in the repo yet. I'm going to suggest that you at least install your initial patch, as it will work in the vast majority of cases.

[Bug c/78539] New: feature request: __noextension__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78539 Bug ID: 78539 Summary: feature request: __noextension__ Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug target/66358] [5/6/7 Regression] [SH] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66358 --- Comment #24 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #23) > Problem seems to have gone away with gcc version 6.1.1, dated 20160621 Thanks for your report. I've confirmed that the testcases don't fail with the head

[Bug c/78536] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78536 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78538] New: system header diagnostic for enum with a define is not good

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78538 Bug ID: 78538 Summary: system header diagnostic for enum with a define is not good Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug c/78536] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78536 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- IPPORT_FTP is used as an enum which is what is causing the issue. I am generating a testcase which shows why the error message is not clear.

[Bug c/78536] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78536 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 78537 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/78537] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78537] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c/78537] New: #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78537 Bug ID: 78537 Summary: #define something doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug c/78536] New: #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78536 Bug ID: 78536 Summary: #define something doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/57965] [F03] Allocation of derived type containing an allocatable character component segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57965 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #3 from

[Bug ipa/78535] [6.2] invalid code generation with -O1 -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78535 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Starke --- Comparing the outputs created with -fdump-tree-all enabled for both tested command-line combinations hints that -flto -fdevirtualize fails when one of the following passes is enabled via -O1: - nothrow - earl

[Bug bootstrap/78531] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78531 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78535] New: [6.2] invalid code generation with -O1 -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78535 Bug ID: 78535 Summary: [6.2] invalid code generation with -O1 -fdevirtualize Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug fortran/78534] New: Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 Bug ID: 78534 Summary: Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug tree-optimization/78533] tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78533 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization Depends on|

[Bug c++/78533] tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78533 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- I forgot to mention that flag -O3 is required to cause the tree check fail.

[Bug c++/78533] New: tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78533 Bug ID: 78533 Summary: tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/78518] [6/7 Regression] Warning format regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78518 --- Comment #2 from physiker at toast2 dot net --- > This is what I get with 5.4.1 20160929 (Ubuntu 5.4.1-2ubuntu2). Which > version of gfortran 6 are you using exactly? > I am using gcc 6.2.0 release, provided by fink. LANG=C gfortran-fsf-6 -v

[Bug rtl-optimization/78447] [7 Regression] wrong code when combine changes shifts by << 5 and >> 15 to >> 10 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78447 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78447] [7 Regression] wrong code when combine changes shifts by << 5 and >> 15 to >> 10 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78447 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: segher Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016 New Revision: 242757 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev Log: combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR78390) r

[Bug rtl-optimization/78438] [7 Regression] incorrect comparison optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78438 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78438] [7 Regression] incorrect comparison optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78438 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 19:24:22 2016 New Revision: 242883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242883&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78438 PR rtl-optimization/78477

[Bug bootstrap/78477] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78477 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 19:24:22 2016 New Revision: 242883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242883&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78438 PR rtl-optimization/78477

[Bug tree-optimization/78528] Recursion not optimized in simple case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- For the int case, we can recognize easily that the function is doing f()+N. While for the Int case it looks worse: [100.0%]: _2 = s_7(D) + 1; D.3625 = strlen (_2); lhs$m_value_13 = MEM[(struct Int *

[Bug tree-optimization/78528] Recursion not optimized in simple case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/78530] std::copy of volatile array triggers invalid conversion error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78530 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://sourceforge.net/p/stlport/bugs/149/

[Bug target/70120] [6 Regression][aarch64] -g causes Assembler messages: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70120 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #12) > I can still trigger this with a testcase using 16-bit floating-point types, > and the tiny memory model: > > int > main (__fp16 x) > { > __fp16 a

[Bug ada/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78527] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:364)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78527 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 18:56:50 2016 New Revision: 242882 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242882&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78526 * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_immed

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #7) > This alternative patch fixes the ICE as well: Unfortunately it causes a few regressions: FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_14.f03 -O scan-tree-dump-t

[Bug target/70120] [6 Regression][aarch64] -g causes Assembler messages: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70120 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/77856] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > So, %ebx doesn't hold 1 as it is supposed to, but 1 << %ecx (64). > Vlad, could you please have a look? It is a bug in a new optimization (invariant inherita

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug rtl-optimization/77541] [7 Regression] wrong code with 512bit vectors of int128 @ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Nov 25 17:42:21 2016 New Revision: 242881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242881&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-25 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/77541

[Bug sanitizer/78532] New: [7 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532 Bug ID: 78532 Summary: [7 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/78531] New: [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78531 Bug ID: 78531 Summary: [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug fortran/60853] [OOP] Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/60853] [OOP] Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Fri Nov 25 17:22:37 2016 New Revision: 242880 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242880&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-25 Janus Weil PR fortran/60853 * int

[Bug rtl-optimization/78527] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:364)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78527 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 17:12:29 2016 New Revision: 242879 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242879&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78527 * combine.c (make_compound_opera

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) > The most immediate way to fix it is this: > [...] > This gets rid of the ICE on the given test case. I will check if it survives > a full regtest. Indeed the p

[Bug fortran/78505] [F08] Coarray source allocation not synchronizing on oversubscribed cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505 --- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson --- Section 9.7.1.2, paragraph 4, of the draft Fortran 2015 standard [1]: "When an ALLOCATE statement is executed for which an allocate-object is a coarray, there is an implicit synchronization of all active ima

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The most immediate way to fix it is this: Index: gcc/fortran/class.c === --- gcc/fortran/class.c (revision 242875) +++ gcc/fortran/c

[Bug libstdc++/78530] New: std::copy of volatile array triggers invalid conversion error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78530 Bug ID: 78530 Summary: std::copy of volatile array triggers invalid conversion error Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug lto/78529] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 Bug ID: 78529 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/78528] New: Recursion not optimized in simple case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528 Bug ID: 78528 Summary: Recursion not optimized in simple case Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c/78512] [7 Regression] r242674 miscompiles Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78512 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/35038] GCOV - using "--coverage" results in libgcov.a(_gcov.o) is referenced by DSO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35038 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/28564] gcov fails to store the absolute path to the source files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28564 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/17040] GCOV not working properly on Windows platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17040 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libgomp/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 --- Comment #18 from Dominik Vogt --- Another approach may be to make the middleend ask the backend for the actual value of REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN (VIRTUAL_STACK_DYNAMIC_REGNUM). Since on Sparc the address is always 4 mod 8, we'd get an additional

[Bug sanitizer/69840] two ASAN help nits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69840 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/71666] profile-generate not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/71666] profile-generate not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 25 14:23:54 2016 New Revision: 242878 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242878&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix documentation reference (PR web/71666) PR web/71666 *

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 25 14:23:25 2016 New Revision: 242877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242877&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Don't use priority {cd}tors if not supported by a target (PR PR g

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- What happens is that valtrack creates a paradoxical subreg: (debug_insn 28 14 15 2 (var_location:V4TI D#2 (subreg:V4TI (reg:TI 94) 0)) -1 (nil)) (insn 15 28 16 2 (set (subreg:TI (reg/v:V4TI 90 [ v ]) 0)

[Bug ipa/78515] [7 Regression] ICE: in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:8999 with -Os -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78515 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/78515] [7 Regression] ICE: in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:8999 with -Os -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78515 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 25 14:05:04 2016 New Revision: 242876 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242876&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-25 Richard Biener PR ipa/78515 * ipa-prop.c

[Bug middle-end/78507] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78507 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou --- > In emit-rtl.c:init_emit(), the alignment of the virtual_stack_dynamic > pointer is hard coded to STACK_BOUNDARY: > > REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN (VIRTUAL_STACK_DYNAMIC_REGNUM) = STACK_BOUNDARY; > > The backen

[Bug libgomp/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 --- Comment #16 from Dominik Vogt --- In emit-rtl.c:init_emit(), the alignment of the virtual_stack_dynamic pointer is hard coded to STACK_BOUNDARY: REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN (VIRTUAL_STACK_DYNAMIC_REGNUM) = STACK_BOUNDARY; The backend must make s

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78527] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:364)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78527 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/77345] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault w/ -misel -O1 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77345 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- Can it possibly be a duplicate of PR71724?

[Bug rtl-optimization/78527] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:364)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78527 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- 8097int width = GET_MODE_PRECISION (GET_MODE (inner)) 8098- INTVAL (XEXP (inner, 1)); 8099if (width > mode_width) 8100 width = mode

[Bug rtl-optimization/78527] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:364)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78527 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here is a slightly less verbose version of the test case which runs into the same ICE: module Communicator_Form implicit none type :: CommunicatorForm contains final :: Finalize end ty

[Bug ada/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ada/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > The MIN_EXPR it builds is correct now though. Looks like a bug in Adas > max_size to me when invoked on > > type type visited string-

[Bug libgomp/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78293] [5/6/7 Regression] SIGABRT with function result used as argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Nov 25 12:23:43 2016 New Revision: 242875 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242875&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-25 Andre Vehreschild Paul Thomas PR fortran/78

[Bug ada/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |ada --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- The MIN_EXPR it builds is correct now though. Looks like a bug in Adas max_size to me when invoked on unit size align 8 symtab 0 alias set 4 canonical type 0x761e7498 precisi

[Bug c++/72808] [6/7 Regression] ICE on valid c++ code in verify_type (gcc/tree.c:14047)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Isn't fixed by that commit.

[Bug target/77345] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault w/ -misel -O1 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77345 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/78518] [6/7 Regression] Warning format regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78518 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77659] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8858

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is tsubst ICE on ADDR_EXPR .

[Bug middle-end/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Eric, Could you help verify if below commit fix this please? https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=242874 Thanks.

[Bug middle-end/78507] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78507 --- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Nov 25 11:45:43 2016 New Revision: 242874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242874&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/78507 PR middle-end/78510

[Bug middle-end/78510] [7 Regression] ICE on valid C code at -O2 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78510 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Nov 25 11:45:43 2016 New Revision: 242874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242874&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/78507 PR middle-end/78510

[Bug middle-end/78517] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78517 --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Nov 25 11:45:43 2016 New Revision: 242874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242874&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/78507 PR middle-end/78510

[Bug c++/78523] [5 Regression] ICE on valid lambda code with implicit capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78523 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/78523] ICE on valid lambda code with implicit capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78523 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

[Bug middle-end/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/78527] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:364)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78527 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug lto/78211] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78211 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug lto/78211] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78211 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/78522] -O2 optimization confused by enum and pointer usage in constructors.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78522 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Jonathan W

  1   2   >