https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69455
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> A two line patch (or one rather long line) is sufficient to work
> around the brokeness of the intrinsics modules.
"Un qui sait vaut mieux que dix qui cherchent!" Could you please be kind enough
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48551
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Nov 21 05:29:36 2016
New Revision: 242648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242648&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-20 Jeff Law
PR target/48551
* reload.h (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48551
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78418
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78418
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78418
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 21 04:41:21 2016
New Revision: 242647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242647&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR objc++/78418 - ICE in string tests on darwin
* tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78442
Bug ID: 78442
Summary: [variant] std::get<...>(Variant) is not constexpr.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78441
Bug ID: 78441
Summary: [variant] variant_alternative doesn't allow cv
qualifiers
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78360
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78440
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78440
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
except.spec/5:
»If any declaration of a function has an exception-specification that is not a
noexcept-specification allowing all exceptions, all declarations, including the
definition and any explicit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78440
Bug ID: 78440
Summary: [7 Regression] [c++17] Incompatible
exception-specification not diagnosed in explicit
instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
/*
gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 copy_n_vs_copy.cpp -lstdc++ -o copy_n_vs_copy
One Past the End
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/iterators.html#iterators.predefined.end
BUG location:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.1.0/include/g++-v5/bits/stl_algo.h
*/
#include
#include
#incl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38522
Florian J. Weber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oss at florianjw dot de
--- Comment #
,
||s390-linux-gnu
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
seen on s390x-linux-gnu as well, when building the m31/32 multilib variant
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot&arch=s390x&ver=20161120-1&stamp=1479682317
&ver=20161120-1&stamp=1479669284
// Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf
// Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 20161120-1'
--with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-snapshot/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++
--prefix=/usr/lib/gcc-sna
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78438
Bug ID: 78438
Summary: incorrect comparison optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78437
Bug ID: 78437
Summary: [7 Regression]: Invalid sign-extend conversion in REE
pass
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78436
Bug ID: 78436
Summary: incorrect write to larger-than-type bitfield (signed
char x:9)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
On a hunch, this brings it back.
$(patsubst %.c,%.lo,$(notdir $(i_matmul_c))): AM_CFLAGS += -ffast-math
-ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops --param max-unroll-times=4 -march=native
So -march=native fixes it. n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #15)
> OMG, the world of processors is more complicated than I thought.
> So, these rather modern AMD chips support AVX, but suck at it.
>
> Two questions:
>
> - Can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Nov 20 20:14:18 2016
New Revision: 242643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-20 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/69741
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Nov 20 20:12:18 2016
New Revision: 242642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-20 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/69741
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Nov 20 18:43:16 2016
New Revision: 242641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-20 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/69741
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 regression] |[5/6 regression]
|-Wm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49726
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-g0 file.S -g does not |[4.4/5/6/7 Regression] -g0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Sun Nov 20 18:34:06 2016
New Revision: 242639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61409
* tree-ssa-uninit.c: Define new glob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
On X86_64:
--- good2016-11-20 19:12:27.353412333 +0100
+++ bad 2016-11-20 19:13:37.738531151 +0100
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@
leaq1(%rax), %rdx
cmpq$0, -8(%r12,%rdx,8)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc |
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
PR 78431 might be the same issue and has the revision ranges where this might
be introduced too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
PR 78432 might be the same issue even with a reduced testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|x86_64-linux-gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
Alec Ari changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neotheuser at ymail dot com
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811
--- Comment #26 from Alec Ari ---
To avoid fully recompiling GCC, I modified libstdc++-v3/configure (not .ac) and
made the following change:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/configure
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/configure
@@ -15014,8 +15014,8 @@ if test "$enable_share
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78435
Bug ID: 78435
Summary: bogus array subscript warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78434
--- Comment #1 from Marc Mutz ---
Created attachment 40089
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40089&action=edit
Testcase, compile with g++ -Wall -o 78434{,.cpp}
Actual Output:
78434.cpp:11:30: warning: ‘new’ of type ‘Align12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78434
Bug ID: 78434
Summary: Incorrect warning about missing align_val_t for
placement new
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78395
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Nov 20 14:21:43 2016
New Revision: 242637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-11-20 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Sun Nov 20 13:35:27 2016
New Revision: 242635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Protect __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0
2016-11-20 Marc Glisse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
On pcc64le this is the assembly diff:
--- good2016-11-20 12:43:40.318860969 +
+++ bad 2016-11-20 12:42:57.277928999 +
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
sldi 9,9,3
ld 10,0(1)
m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47877
Jan Engelhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jengelh at inai dot de,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433
Bug ID: 78433
Summary: [7 Regression] glibc posix/execvpe.c gets miscompiled
with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432
Bug ID: 78432
Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu
(libgo x32 multilibs)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431
Bug ID: 78431
Summary: [7 regression] ICE in go_append_padding, at
godump.c:636
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267
--- Comment #55 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Sun Nov 20 10:51:53 2016
New Revision: 242634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242634&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add PR sanitizer/78267 patch to libsanitizer/LOCAL_PATCHES
Modified:
trun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267
--- Comment #54 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Sun Nov 20 10:49:47 2016
New Revision: 242633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix libsanitizer build on OS X 10.1[01], macOS 10.12 (PR sanitizer/78267)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78430
--- Comment #1 from Armleo ---
System: Ubuntu server 16.04 x64 Azure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
OMG, the world of processors is more complicated than I thought.
So, these rather modern AMD chips support AVX, but suck at it.
Two questions:
- Can you check if -mfma3 and/or -mfma4 make any difference?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78430
Bug ID: 78430
Summary: libstc++-v3 Build failed
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78429
Bug ID: 78429
Summary: ice on valid C code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in both
32-bit and 64-bit modes (internal compiler error: in
set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)
Produc
55 matches
Mail list logo
