[Bug tree-optimization/78343] [6/7 Regression] Loop is not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78343 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78344] New: ice on invalid c++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in cp_check_const_attributes, at cp/decl2.c:1347)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78344 Bug ID: 78344 Summary: ice on invalid c++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in cp_check_const_attributes, at

[Bug tree-optimization/78343] New: Loop is not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78343 Bug ID: 78343 Summary: Loop is not eliminated Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/78342] New: [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2657 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

ror: in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2657 0x320be071ca5 _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*) /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-7.0.0_alpha20161113/work/gcc-7-20161113/gcc/rtl-error.c:108 0x320bdc3d037 rtl_verify_bb_insns /va

[Bug sanitizer/65662] ASAN is broken for 48bit VA on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/77827] tsan lacks support for 48 bit VMA on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77827 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/77827] tsan lacks support for 48 bit VMA on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77827 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/78341] New: crash on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in cp_parser_std_attribute_spec, at cp/parser.c:24597)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78341 Bug ID: 78341 Summary: crash on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in cp_parser_std_attribute_spec, at cp/parser.c:24597) Product: gcc

[Bug c/78284] warn on malloc with very large arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78284 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/77531] __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77531 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Work-in-progress patch posted for comments: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg01272.html

[Bug target/77346] [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #3) > Can you run your compile line with -v and post > the results, to see if there are any other flags passed to cc1 that I am > unaware of? As in comment 0: % pow

[Bug libstdc++/78326] incorrect c++ usage in experimental/vector and others? _X_max_align is inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78326 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Nov 14 02:00:26 2016 New Revision: 242373 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242373&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR78326 fix incorrect access of data member in base class PR lib

[Bug ipa/78258] [7 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78258 --- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like a dupof PR78121 which is fixed. z1.f90 is now working.

[Bug libstdc++/78326] incorrect c++ usage in experimental/vector and others? _X_max_align is inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78326 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Not actually fixed on trunk yet, as I'm having trouble committing. I'll do it asap.

[Bug libstdc++/78326] incorrect c++ usage in experimental/vector and others? _X_max_align is inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78326 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel

[Bug other/78340] DLLTool Put Wrong Hint Value In Lib Archieve (Idata6 Section)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78340 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/78340] New: DLLTool Put Wrong Hint Value In Lib Archieve (Idata6 Section)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78340 Bug ID: 78340 Summary: DLLTool Put Wrong Hint Value In Lib Archieve (Idata6 Section) Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/78339] New: -fcheck-pointer-bounds breaks -fsuggest-attribute=noreturn on main 'exit'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78339 Bug ID: 78339 Summary: -fcheck-pointer-bounds breaks -fsuggest-attribute=noreturn on main 'exit' Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/78334] [7 Regression] [C++1z] P0127R2 related ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/78337] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault", using local variable in lambda return-type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78337 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/78326] incorrect c++ usage in experimental/vector and others? _X_max_align is inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78326 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/78302] is_move_constructible_v> should be false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78302 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yeah this area's a bit icky. We'd like to do something, as long as we don't change the argument passing ABI.

[Bug c/35503] Warning about restricted pointers?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35503 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Sun Nov 13 19:38:36 2016 New Revision: 242366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-13 Prathamesh Kulkarni PR

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Nov 13 18:31:17 2016 New Revision: 242362 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242362&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78232 PR rtl-optimization/782

[Bug rtl-optimization/78232] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr48124-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78232 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Nov 13 18:31:17 2016 New Revision: 242362 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242362&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78232 PR rtl-optimization/7824

[Bug bootstrap/78338] New: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on mips-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78338 Bug ID: 78338 Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on mips-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: b

[Bug target/78336] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78336] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #7) > The following is sufficient to suppress the ICE: ... and regtests cleanly.

[Bug target/78336] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn --- I committed option 3.

[Bug target/78336] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 --- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn --- Author: dje Date: Sun Nov 13 14:28:49 2016 New Revision: 242353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242353&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/78336 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_asm_weaken

[Bug target/78336] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #3) > So the problem is the reference to ASM_OUTPUT_DEF in rs6000_asm_weaken_decl, > despite the fact that the function never will be called on Darwin. > Previously the

[Bug c++/78337] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault", using local variable in lambda return-type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78337 --- Comment #1 from aaron.mcdaid at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 40033 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40033&action=edit crashing output from gcc 6.2.0

[Bug c++/78337] New: "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault", using local variable in lambda return-type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78337 Bug ID: 78337 Summary: "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault", using local variable in lambda return-type deduction Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/78336] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- So the problem is the reference to ASM_OUTPUT_DEF in rs6000_asm_weaken_decl, despite the fact that the function never will be called on Darwin. Previously the ASM_WEAKEN_DECL macro was protected by RS6000_W

[Bug target/78336] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #1) > I thought that Darwin specifically picked up the definition from > config/darwin.h. > > I don't understand the failure because the rs6000.h logic did not change a

[Bug target/78336] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn --- I thought that Darwin specifically picked up the definition from config/darwin.h. I don't understand the failure because the rs6000.h logic did not change and rs6000_asm_weaken_decl is declared in rs6000-pr

[Bug target/78336] New: powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78336 Bug ID: 78336 Summary: powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken (probably by 241930) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug tree-optimization/78335] New: Fold ~(1 << x) -> (~1 lrotate_expr x) on GIMPLE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78335 Bug ID: 78335 Summary: Fold ~(1 << x) -> (~1 lrotate_expr x) on GIMPLE Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tre

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The backtrace on current trunk is: call concrete % run() internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2239 0xb9ecfc fold_convert_loc(unsigned int, tree_node*, tree_node*)

[Bug fortran/60952] [F03] Problem using "end" as a type-bound procedure and contained procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60952 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/60952] [F03] Problem using "end" as a type bound procedure and contained procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60952 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Nov 13 11:12:05 2016 New Revision: 242352 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242352&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-13 Janus Weil PR fortran/60952 * dec

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Thomas, Thanks for the report, I will take a look. Regards, Prathamesh

[Bug fortran/66366] [OOP] ICE on invalid with non-allocatable CLASS variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66366 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #5 from janus

[Bug fortran/66366] [OOP] ICE on invalid with non-allocatable CLASS variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66366 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Nov 13 09:56:10 2016 New Revision: 242351 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242351&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-13 Janus Weil PR fortran/66366 * res