https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334
--- Comment #4 from Anatoliy Tomilov ---
Now I see it. My mistake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Anatoliy Tomilov from comment #2)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> > markus@x4 /tmp % cat lam.ii
> > template auto constexpr_string([](auto) {});
> > void foo() { cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334
--- Comment #2 from Anatoliy Tomilov ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> markus@x4 /tmp % cat lam.ii
> template auto constexpr_string([](auto) {});
> void foo() { constexpr_string<0>(0); };
>
> markus@x4 /tmp % clang++ -c -s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Nov 13 06:51:23 2016
New Revision: 242348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242348&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DR 374 - specialization in outer namespace
PR c++/56840
size, char const (&
value)[size] >` template parameter pack for variable template. I.e. the problem
triggered namely by `auto const &` template non-type parameter.
Version:
7.0.0 20161112
System type:
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Command line:
$ g++ prog.cc -Wall -Wextra -v -I/usr/local/boos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333
Bug ID: 78333
Summary: Intrinsics lack no_instrument_function attribute and
thus breaks -finstrument-functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60952
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch in comment #3 regtests cleanly. Will commit as obvious.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60952
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60952
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Problem using "end" as a|[F03] Problem using "end"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78225
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67631
--- Comment #3 from Paul Dreik ---
This is still present in trunk, rev 242335
g++-trunk (GCC) 7.0.0 20161112 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45516
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Undefined |[5/6 Regression] Undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Sat Nov 12 15:13:14 2016
New Revision: 242336
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242336&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Don't forget to initialize the TOC (PR77957)
The code gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
It might make sense to add -fuse-ld=bfd to the AM_CXXFLAGS for now.
(lld is also broken.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67631
Paul Dreik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at pauldreik dot se
--- Comment #2 from
(i'm new here, i don't know the norms, if i'm doing it all wrong, sorry)
tested on gcc 6.2.0 and 5.4.0, amd64, same results.
code: http://paste.debian.net/plain/894930
in here, method1 is significantly slower than the others, and called
twice in the loop. i believe that Os (correctly) concluded
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78232
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77501
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77501
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Nov 12 09:25:47 2016
New Revision: 242335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-12 Janus Weil
PR fortran/77501
* cla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78227
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78332
Bug ID: 78332
Summary: [ARM] Negative costs of ivopts groups
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331
Bug ID: 78331
Summary: Misleading error message from submodule when module
has no module procedures.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
29 matches
Mail list logo
